Sometimes traders say "confidence" is important. I didn't get it, but starting to now. When you believe in your own abilities, you don't latch onto one stock/strategy/style. Cutting a loss or taking a profit is easy if you know there's always another good trade around the corner.
As opposed to when a trade is "the opportunity of a lifetime" or if it's "make or break." If everything comes down to this, you're emotionally invested and can't think clearly. Experience brings the perspective that new opportunities will appear and you'll be able to find them.
Confidence in you, the trader, instead of the trade. In fact, there are so many opportunities that you'll miss 99% of them, but you'll still do pretty well with the 1% you do manage to find. There's a fine line between learning from missed opportunities and agonizing over them.
You can't teach confidence. It can only be acquired by proving yourself over time, and you can easily lose it again. So there's a feedback loop between performance and confidence. Smarter to avoid going into a vicious cycle instead of having to extricate yourself from one.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The philosophical difference between investors and traders is that traders value humility. The name of the book The Intelligent Investor implies other approaches are unintelligent. The allegory of Mr. Market as a manic basket case teaches investors to regard it with contempt. 1/
Investors value intelligence, conviction, and pain tolerance. A success story is Michael Burry in The Big Short. He was years early, held to his conviction, took the pain, and was rewarded for it in the end. The formula works if you're right, but is catastrophic if you're wrong.
But we've seen once great investors unwilling to let go of a stock, sector, theme, strategy, or style, endure years of pain, and it sinks them. Fear of missing the turn and misplaced conviction. Brilliant investors especially fall to this trap - they aren't used to being wrong.