One thing about the @AngelaRayner 'sacking': tensions between her and @Keir_Starmer have until now been under the radar and conducted by proxies for both sides.
Will be interesting to see what both say publicly in coming hours. And whether it's plausible.
Gaya Sriskanthan, Momentum co-chair, responds to the news that Angela Rayner is to be sacked as party chair:
"Angela Rayner's sacking is blatant scapegoating."
One ex-Corbyn era Labour staffer: "This Angela decision is probably one of the stupidest political decisions a leaders office has made in a very long time. And that includes putting Richard Burgon on the front bench."
Big Q is what job she gets next and how her talents are deployed. Different wings of party felt @AngelaRayner stint at shadow education was impressive.
Worth noting this too after Labour's hammering among working class voters: her frustration at Corbyn devoting billions to abolishing student tuition fees while giving relatively little to early years spending was classic eg of middleclass v working class worldview
But Starmer is getting support from some MPs. Here's one: "I'm delighted Keir's done this. She needs to take her share of the blame for the campaign she was in charge of. What was the slogan of our campaign? There wasn't one..
"Her presentations to the PLP on the campaign updates were streams of consciousness. She's also been making life difficult for David Evans [party general secretary]. It had to stop."
If she ends up with a public-facing shadow cabinet job, weird thing about this is it could all have been packaged as a promotion not a kneecapping.
Which takes me back to my first tweet.
Another Labour insider furious at Rayner sacking: "Angela Rayner was not responsible for the [May elections] slogan. That was completely the responsibility of those obsessed with focus groups.."
Ie Leader's office.
I wrote this yesterday fwiw: "a culling of his frontbench may jar with his pledge to take personal responsibility for the defeats".
Plus: "Starmer doesn’t need armchair punditry, podcaster chin-stroking or advice from Twitter. He can’t easily wave a magic wand when struggling against incumbency (Lab doing well in Wales shows how a sitting govts benefit from Covid competence) +long-term fissures in Lab coaltn"
What's always been striking in #indyref2 debate is just how much pro-independence voices *sound* like Brexiteers: national self-determination is ultimately the priority.
Most Brexiteers + pro-indy supporters both vehemently hate the comparison - but do some concede it is valid?
This isn't a comment on the merits of Brexit or Scottish independence. Just that despite the obvious cultural/political differences between the SNP + Tories, they share a central philosophy: self-determination.
And yes, one clear motivator for Scots independence is as a route to regaining EU membership and therefore *sharing* national sovereignty, ie a complex/subtle sense of nationhood. The counter case is you can pool sovereignty within the UK via devolution not independence.
Feels like @Keir_Starmer getting excuses in early if Hartlepool goes Tory:
"I don’t think anyone realistically thought it would be possible to turn Labour round from worst general election result since 1935 to a position to win the next gen elxn within a period of one year"
He's been saying this a lot of course in recent weeks.
But citing Biden, he starts to sketch out 2024 vision: long-termism on economy; preventive health + linking public services like crime + housing; skills + education; more devolution; culture change to unity rather than division
Sad to see last of @Line_of_duty but I really liked the way @jed_mercurio linked incompetence and greed with institutional corruption. Add in corporate culture of restructuring and backside covering and it felt all too plausible.
A 'whydunnit' not just a 'whodunnit'.
A much more interesting and aptly unsettling note on which to end. Bravo @jed_mercurio@Vicky_McClure Adrian Dunbar, @martin_compston + all the team 👏 👏 👏
"Whatever you do, you do it because you care about truth and accountability. You do it because you carry the fire.'
Totally true. But my faint hope that there will be another series of @Line_of_duty is now even fainter. This sounds like a valedictory...unless...unless..
My deluded, latest theory/hope: this isn't the final series because (as brilliantly as last week put so many bits of the jigsaw together) there still seem too many loose ends to tie up in one episode (Ted + the Corbetts, Ted and Banks, Ted+ children's home)...And..
....if Osborne is H surely he needed more screen time to help us work out the full extent of his evil.