I don't think I've ever posted about Legit Internal Happenings, yet *another* proto-Q LARP.

Longtime followers already know this, but for newbies: /pol/ was ripe for something exactly like QAnon. Legit Internal Happenings was active in February 2017.

But read this:
If you didn't or couldn't click in, an anon asked whether "pedos" were getting "BTFO'd" (stands for blown the fuck out," btw). "Yes," says Legit Internal Happenings, "and it will only get worse from here."

Cue questions about public trials and politicians as the guilty parties.
But here's the thing: this guy only lasted for three threads (as far as I've been able to find).

What would've happened if he'd developed the pedogate angle a *little* bit more?

I suspect he wouldn't have been *as* successful as Q, but I bet he would've retained an audience.
One of the things *stopping* him from becoming a well-known LARPer -- aside from the apparent fact that he got bored and wandered off -- was that he came in WAY too hot with concrete predictions (so did Q, but no one KNEW did it: Q's first drops on 10/28/17 sank without a trace).
Specifically, in this guy's first thread he suggested that President Trump got "a kick out of the memes" on 4chan, adding: "over the remainder of February, things will begin happening that will start to shift the left's opinion (Citizens, not the media)."

archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/112…
In his second thread, he said: "Within the next 48 hours, a announcement will be made, these announcements will be science and technology based."

Then he hinted that maybe they were alien-related. However...

archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/113…
If you look at his comments downthread from the OP, you can see him already trying to backpedal on his February deadline.

This post is particularly telling: he makes the same basic predictions he did 5 days ago, but the deadline is "April at the latest."

archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/113…
BTW, the link above is worth clicking on, because you'll note how EXTREMELY Q-like this LARPer sounds. Heck, I'll toss it in here one more time.

But again: it's not like people didn't *know* anons wanted to hear this fantasy. This guy *absolutely* knew.

archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/113…
He just wasn't *as successful* as Q in meeting that demand.

And if you read his threads, you'll find people referring to MORE LARPers who claimed to be highly-placed Trump Administration sources.

Here, an anon makes a pastiche of one such LARPer's posts.
i.4pcdn.org/pol/1487649428…
The point of all this is that, as long-time readers will know, someone like Q was bound to emerge. There were many, many contenders on 4chan all striving to meet the anons' desires (including the desire to see Trump as a competent and heroic figure, BTW).
At some point I should just stop documenting these guys. Legit Internal Happenings may well be the last.

But just because I won't be *talking* about them doesn't mean they aren't *there*. Just remember, when you read any of my threads, that Q is treading a VERY well-worn path.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with The Q Origins Project

The Q Origins Project Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @QOrigins

10 May
So @kunstderfuge1 made a graphic re: what we do and don't know based on pictures from the drops.

The gist of it is, as I mentioned elsethread, that *if* the person who took the screenshots is *also* the person who made the posts,

*then* we know what timezone the post is from. Image
If they're separate people -- if someone is taking that screenshot and then emailing or texting it to Q, who THEN posts -- all we know is that Q has a confederate *in that time zone.*

To me, this is a somewhat academic distinction. If you're providing content for the Q drops...
well, then you're Q, right? Q is the person *or team* that creates the drops.

And if, OTOH, Q is a single person just going through their old photos and screenshotting good ones so they'll be right at the top of the list when they go to make a phonepost on 8kun... 'kay, great.
Read 4 tweets
10 May
This couldn't go into the piece, BUT: y'know how all the photos we looked at were screenshots?

In my *opinion*, Q was sitting on their couch, scrolling through old photos 'til they found one they wanted to use; screenshotting to put it @ the top of the list; and phoneposting.
So my /personal take/ is that Q was probably physically in, and posting from, the places where the screenshots were created.

However, we can't *rule out* the possibility that someone else screenshotted the photos and texted them to Q (or emailed or whatever).
Which is why the piece very carefully does not say that the place the screenshot is taken was the place the post was made from. We don't *know* that.

But I think it's very, very likely true.
Read 5 tweets
10 May
I am pleased to announce the first forensic evidence of Q’s whereabouts, discovered by my colleague Abigail X (@BobPythonic) with help from Robert Amour (@kunstderfuge1). The full story is up @bellingcat; we summarize our work in this thread.

bellingcat.com/uncategorized/…
Using image metadata, we have been able to geolocate Q to a specific part of the world. Highlighted below are the only two time zones where, in our sample, two or more of Q’s images were taken.

The *vast* majority, ~68%, were from the Pacific time zone.

So… how did we do it? Image
Most images in Q drops don’t have enough useful metadata to analyze, but a specific subset, images which are phone screenshots, do. In the “DateCreated” field, we found a series of timestamps that reveal the time when Q took these screenshots, just before posting the drop.
Read 14 tweets
9 May
Here are some replies to GhostEzra’s “100 million armed patriots… synagogue of Satan” post, from the “peaceful research movement” that is QAnon

And yes, that IS a closet full of ammo in image 3: image 4 has it in detail. ImageImageImageImage
More replies, including from a gentleman who claims to have lots and lots of “ghost guns,” which is… not especially legal, last I heard. ImageImageImageImage
This dude is on some Rwanda shit.

Rwanda is my darkest scenario for how the current political situation ends. The right DOES have a lot of heavily-armed people who think of liberals as monstrous and subhuman. It could happen here.

It PROBABLY won’t. I hope. But it could. Image
Read 7 tweets
9 May
I want y’all to understand that conspiracy theorists aren’t going to let go of the “elites want to enslave us” angle any time soon.

Typically, the claim is: elites want to kill most of the people on Earth and then enslave the survivors.

1/4
If I were a conspiracy-theory *evangelist,* I would think long and hard about decoupling the slavery claim from the genocide claim, bc you can point —for instance— at how Amazon treats its workers and delivery drivers, which is basically a 21st-century version of 19th-c BS.

2/4
But, happily for all of us, conspiracy theories aren’t really crafted to *spread as rapidly as possible.*

They’re crafted to meet the emotional needs of their adherents.

So lots of plausible lines of attack get left on the cutting-room floor bc they *don’t* meet those needs.
Read 7 tweets
4 May
In archaeology, you're always *one find away* from revising your opinion.

This is one of those finds. It *strongly* suggests that the same person was posting as Q both at the very beginning, in 11/2017, and months later in 5/2018.
Prior to this find, it was conventional wisdom among Q-watchers that the "Q" persona had changed hands in 1/2018. That wasn't TOTALLY uncontested, but it was frequent.

But here's the problem for that view: in 11/2017, Q posted a picture (*maybe* of the islands off Hong Kong...
according to some experts I've been talking to).

In 5/2018, Q posted another photo *of the same islands clearly taken in the same flight.*

So if Q wasn't the same person on both dates... how'd that happen?
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(