2016, Scotland wanted to stay in the EU.
England voted no.
2017, Scotland wanted to stay in the Single Market. England voted to leave.
2019, Scotland was happy to have a referendum or stay in the Single Market.
England voted no.
People wanted to go ahead with Brexit and now we all have to be prepared to live with the political consequences.
England had 3 votes on it, and 3 times they voted that they cared more about the sovereignty of the union than the actual union.
How messed up is that?
A theoretical political concept was more important to the English than the people in Scotland or Northern Ireland.
I don't remember a single English politician saying that maybe we should consider what was best for the union and that we should regain some perspective.
I don't remember one person in the media interviewing those politicians saying that they need to cut all this 'sovereignty' crap and start focusing on the real problems we were facing.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
People say the Brexiteers sovereignty arguments are going to be used against them, but it goes much deeper than that.
I don't think Johnson has a single senior minister who hasn't demonstrated themselves either a pathological liar over Brexit or a simpering sell out who will do anything to follow the party line.
The original inhabitants of an area in Europe known as the Saar Basin were believed to have been a Gallic tribe until it was invaded by the Romans.
At that point German and French historians differ, and when different historians from different nations see things differently in terms of who lived where, that usually spells trouble.
Eurosceptics used to be uncommonly honest about Ireland and Brexit being a problem. They didn’t think there would be problems with goods, but also referred to people too.
🧵
Even in the EU some wanted controls because they were really worried about a porous border.
1. Now we’ve seen the defence and foreign policy plans I’m going to comment them through the lens of just this one tweet and the suggestion it all went wrong when it became a political union. (Thread)
2. The main problems with that line is that the EEC officially becomes a political union on May 14th, 1972 when it goes public with its first joint foreign policy position.
3. By 1992, the EEC had developed this concept through a number of mechanisms which are very similar to Maastricht when compared closely.
Maybe it not being ashamed of the British flag, but being proud of the Great British cultural tradition of understatement and being horrified that it is under attack from politicians who want to supplant it with American culture.