This seems to confuse duties of confidence to individuals that arise out of the relationship between medical professionals & patients (to which there are exceptions - rarely exercised), the disclosure of personal identifiable data that may apply to other organisations.
Of course duties of confidence (when they arise) have to be seen in the context of clear informed consent.
If the patient gives their INFORMED consent then the duty of confidence goes but is limited to the terms of the consent.
A patient might give consent for their case to be disclosed in training, for instance, but not to a newspaper.
Sometimes patients are keen to disclose for many reasons as we have seen on TV re Covid. They want others to know to take it seriously. Personal choices
There are rare instances where even without consent disclosures are permissible.
Here is a flow diagram from the Dept of Health Guidelines to NHS personnel.
Different duties of confidence MAY arise within other professions depending upon the category of material and/or their contractual or professional relationship to an individual or organisation.
What if the reason for the non disclosure is not to protect (say) patient confidence but to refuse suitably anonymised information to protect organisations from reputation all harm or political embarrassment?
That is a different matter.
So if there was just one person with a particular condition in a town removing their name from the information would not really anonymise it at all.
But to give details on how many pupils nationally or regionally have contracted Covid (for instance) (or a particular variant) in any one week when there have been several instances is hardly breaching confidence.
Indeed hiding it maybe to spare the blushes of politicians or those developing policy.
In those circumstances duties may arise with professionals who see untruthful accounts given leading to unsafe practice to blow the whistle .
Similarly with regard to unsafe policy.
There is nothing ethical about trying to hide that.
With regard to Covid there is a real public interest tension because this is a highly infectious disease and deadly for some. So the public in a particular area knowing they may be at risk is important and there are limits (as we know) to contact tracing.
But, for instance, if a parent, fellow pupils, a member of the public or journalist got to hear that a particular school was affected by Covid, or indeed a particular individual, and, in particular, a more infectious variant then would they be under any duty of confidence. No!
People may choose to be discreet about individuals.
But the main point is that duties of confidence are not as clear cut as the original tweet suggests and public interest disclosure was not addressed at all.
Also there are occasions when public safety and security may weigh in favour of disclosure.
We have seen instances where educational establishments seem to have failed to inform members of staff that they may have been exposed to the risk of Covid and failed to take adequate measures to protect staff.
Then there is the issue of when there are competing duties. A duty of confidence but also a duty of protection of others.
So a head teacher might have a contractual and ethical duty of confidence towards one pupil but he or she also has a duty of care towards all the other pupils, other teachers and their connected community (eg when an infectious disease has cropped up)
Which overrides the other?
I have to say that the chances of keeping there fact that one or more pupils or teachers have contracted Covid quiet in a school environment is small.
And if Covid has transmitted to other pupils/staff, good luck with keeping that quiet.
And should you?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
NAVALNY:
“The head of the Omsk Ministry of Health, Alexander Murakhovsky, disappeared in the forest while hunting. Murakhovsky gained fame after Alexei Navalny was poisoned at the hospital he headed.
Over the past year, a number of hospital doctors have already resigned or died.”
“On March 26, after suffering a stroke in December, Rustam Agishev, head of the hospital's traumatology and orthopedics department, died”
“On Feb 4, Sergey Maksimishin, the deputy head of the hospital, died suddenly. The cause of death of the 55-year-old doctor in the hospital was not named.”
How long before the middle classes show their force saying they are now the “ignored” and “sneered at” particularly when so many have pulled themselves up by the bootstraps from poverty and have no wish to return there.
Meanwhile both main political parties fight over their version of “the working class”, currently with the Tories’ aspirational version seemingly gaining ascendency in many places at present.
Labour presents its version as “looking after” the working classes when I am guessing many want to get out of it. Certainly my parents did.
“They have brought their cases to dear old London town, with its quaint judges in 18th-century wigs and gowns and gothic courtrooms, and with laws that can look as if they are made to match, for all their claims to modernity.”
“As Belton appeared to foresee, London’s lawyers are hard at work. Carter-Ruck, CMS, Harbottle & Lewis and Taylor Wessing have a billionaire apiece in a kind of socialism of the litigious.”
Picture of two pandemics: Covid cases fall in rich west as poorer nations suffer | Coronavirus | The Guardian
More cases have been reported in the past two weeks than in the entire first six months of the pandemic, with south Asia bearing the brunt. theguardian.com/world/2021/may…
“Africa now accounts for only 1% of vaccine doses administered globally, the WHO said, down from 2% a few weeks ago, as other regions’ vaccine distribution programmes are progressing much faster”.
“The first vaccines deliveries to 41 African countries under the Covax scheme began in March, but nine countries have so far administered only a quarter of the doses received, while 15 countries have used less than half of their allocations.”
“Politicians, like priests, will always make their easiest converts among “the weak, the unlucky, the resentful, the fearful and the poor”. We should care for these people, of course we should, but not always for their views.” thetimes.co.uk/article/the-po…
The problem is not so much Starmer as his boss, the Labour Party.
I have great admiration for many of the Party’s MPs but the context in which they operate is one of a never ending, exhausting, bitter political in fight leading to bad policies to appease the unwise.
As for Johnson.
“There’s no spray-on defeat for this man. Why do we think the voters haven’t yet cottoned on? They have. And they aren’t bothered. When you keep telling people something and they don’t seem to take any notice,