There is an aspect to totalitarianism we need to talk about: People believe what they are told to believe.
2/ The latest chapter in the saga of the radicalization of the Republican Party centers on Liz Cheney, who may be ousted from her leadership position in the House because she refuses to capitulate to Trump’s big lie about the election.
8/ Trump, remember, had no interest in trying to control the virus.
He wanted to control the narrative.
The pandemic wouldn't be a problem if everyone believed Covid was no worse than the flu, people were dying of other causes, and the numbers of the dead were exaggerated.
9/ He wouldn’t have to worry about controlling a pandemic that didn’t exist.
This is a variation of the standard question from college philosophy classes: “If a tree falls in the woods, but nobody heard, did it make a noise?”
10/ In a totalitarian regime, the question becomes: “If a tree falls in the woods, but nobody believes it fell, did it really fall?”
If there is a pandemic, but nobody believes there’s a pandemic, is there really a pandemic?
If it’s never in the history books, did it happen?
11/ If Trump lost the election, but enough people believe he won, did he really lose?
You can either win an election, or you can persuade everyone that you won.
The Republican approach is the latter.
12/ This feels like a turning point for Cheney because she personally reached a line she won’t cross.
We’ve watched as various Republicans reach their limit.
Some jumped ship when Trump became the Republican nominee.
Others, not until after he became president.
13/ Liz Cheney campaigned for Trump in 2020, so she was fine with all Trump’s lies during the four years he was in office. washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/…
But she reached her limit with the insurrection, which she understood was sparked by the lie that Trump won the election.
14/ To slow or stop the Republican slide toward totalitarianism, enough Republicans have to denounce the lie.
But this would require an open vote, not a secret vote.
A secret vote to keep her in her position means they're still going along, too cowardly to speak out.
15/ If you do the wrong thing because you’re a coward instead of evil, you’re still doing the wrong thing.
Whatever the reason if enough people go along with the lie, it can become truth in this totalitarian way.
16/ Now, on the other hand, if the vote is not secret it might be a watershed moment — if enough Republican members of Congress have the courage to say aloud, the election was not stolen and Trump didn’t win.
17/ If they do that, it's harder for Trump to maintain the illusion.
Trump’s power lessens, and it’s harder for his successor to just pick up where he left off. It stops or slows the Republican slide toward totalitarianism.
18/ I don’t expect this to happen. It would be great, but they had their chances with two impeachments.
What do the rest of us do as the Republican Party embraces totalitarianism?
We hold on to the truth, even though people around us are resistant to the truth.
They couldn't do that without losing the support of Trump's "base."
They choose power over truth.
When Lindsay Graham said the GOP can't grow without Trump, he meant they can't win without Trump's voters.
Exactly. The idea that history is written by the victors (incorrectly attributed to Churchill, I believe) is downright nihilistic. It's also very fascist.
It's the idea that facts don't matter.
Chilling.
She was 16. She led her walkout more than 4 years before Rosa Parks refused to give up her seat on a bus, and before MLK, Jr. embraced nonviolence as the way to equality.
After she and her classmates turned the rural town of Farmville upside down, she called in the NAACP.
2/
The NAACP took their case all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Barbara and her classmates became plaintiffs in Brown v. Board of Education, the landmark case that ended segregation in America.
Their case was combined with cases from other states.
3/
There's also "harmless error." On appeal you have to show error, plus you have to show that the error might have actually changed the outcome. law.cornell.edu/wex/harmless_e…
Errors are common.
Errors that were not "harmless" are rare.
Actually, now that I poke around, that 20% is high. I haven't done appeals for about 6 years now.
I think the number is more like 10-15%, but again, that includes "wins" on something small that doesn't change the outcome.