Interesting thread here.
I have a few theories about what happened/what's going on, starting with a pop-culture disconnect between "what Trump DID" (crimes, collusion, etc.) and "what Trump will be PUNISHED for" (not a goddamn thing)
Trump absorbed two lessons early in his career:

1. People have a tendency to assume that if a person *isn't* punished significantly, whatever they did couldn't have been that bad.

2. The US does not significantly punish rich white men -- for ANYTHING.
“I could stand in the middle of 5th Avenue and shoot somebody and I wouldn’t lose voters" -- 100% true

"I could stand in the middle of 5th Avenue and shoot somebody and I would never go to jail" -- also 100% true
Now, add to that, perversely bad reporting on the topic from major news outlets, notably, the New York Times, which has been infamously on the wrong side of everything from "how dangerous is Hitler?" to "WMDs, does Iraq have them & does it justify an invasion?"
Honestly, with their track record, you'd think people would know by now that the front page of the NYT is a REVERSE indicator for what's really going on "oh, the NYT thinks her e-mails is the worst scandal ever? Must be a nothingburger then."
Why is the New York Times so bad? That's the thing I'm still not entirely sure of. I suspect it's got something to do with their pro-millionaire bias, but who knows really?
Now, add to that, the grifters, weirdos, professional liars, and the same shady troll farm psy-ops that were the topic under discussion, who were out there trying to shape the "Russia controversy" into a false binary.
EITHER Trump's Russia collusion was 100% actionable treason and he was DEFINITELY going to jail ANY MINUTE NOW --
OR it was all completely fake, invented to... hurt Bernie's chances somehow? Cover up Hillary's involvement in underage pizza-related crimes? Be a big meanie to Trump for ABSOLUTELY NO REASON? Deny Maga racism? Distract from. Trumps REAL crimes, which were [x]?
The supposed reasons for the "Russiagate Hoax" were incredibly varied & appeared to come from both left and right perspectives, a pattern that reminded me of nothing so much as all the many justifications for why we should invade Iraq.
FYI, the best perspective on the Maga-Russia connection comes from @C_Stroop who really does know what she's talking about on this topic.
Until the Trump-Russia connection made the news, I didn't realize there was such a strong connection between post-Soviet Russia & US white nationalists & conservative evangelicals, but there's a whole thing there, a history, it's not just Trump.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with McJulie is writing the next book

McJulie is writing the next book Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @mcjulie

10 May
This is an interesting discussion, and it prompted me to want to clarify something --
First, the concept of "sin" -- a vague & slippery concept which has no meaning outside of a religious context.

Because "sin" is more or less *defined* as an offense against God, while "abuse" is an offense against other people, "crime" is an offense against law, etc.
I think Christians -- especially conservative, purity-culture Christians -- often deliberately use "sin" interchangeably with other descriptions of "bad behavior" & it's done for a deceptive, evil purpose --
Read 12 tweets
9 May
Well worth reading.
Interesting quote from the Traitor, Franklin Graham, "Christian nationalism doesn’t exist [it's] just another name to throw at Christians. [..] The left is very good at calling people names.”
The same people who claim "America is a Christian nation" claim "Christian nationalism doesn't exist"
“The greatest ethnic dog whistle the right has ever come up with is ‘Christian,’ because it means ‘people like us,’ it means white.”
--Samuel Perry, sociologist at the University of Oklahoma
Read 6 tweets
8 May
Since pleasure-shaming is apparently my theme for the morning, it's one of the elements really in play when it comes to fat-shaming.
I mean... as a middle-aged person whose general level of fitness took a major hit when Covid lockdowns disrupted all my routines, I get the whole "desire to fat-shame self" but the truth is, I'm just a regular-sized dame thinking "I've looked/felt better"
And it's really ironic because most of our "oh no you're out of shape/fat" narratives are structured around pleasure-shaming too, like, you must be out of shape because lazy, fat because you ate too many treats.
Read 12 tweets
8 May
This touches on arguments we've been having with Tim Keller & other Christian apologists: they admit hardcore right wing politicization of the church is wrong, but will proclaim with their dying breath the sacred right to shame the innocent pleasures of marginalized groups
Whether it's some "dirtbag leftist" shaming "liberal wine moms" for enjoying brunch, or some "liberal but not TOO liberal" preacher shaming gay people for wanting to get married or trans people for existing --
Nothing gets a certain kind of person more bent than the "wrong" sort of person enjoying something that doesn't hurt anybody.
Read 19 tweets
7 May
Reading this thread, sometimes I wonder how the people who raised us in these churches ever got the idea that they were 1. raising functional adults 2. who would remain in the church AS adults
I mean, apparently it never once occurred to them "you know, If we teach a bunch of ridiculous nonsense as crucial to our faith, it gives the impression that our faith is a bunch of ridiculous nonsense"
My own parents didn't go in for this kind of stuff much, especially not my dad, but that just leads to a different problem: "We're raising you in this church where a huge percentage of the people believe in stuff (like creationism) that we don't believe in."
Read 13 tweets
1 May
I wrote a transcript of the video and a response to the transcript, thread follows. Please enjoy, if enjoy is the right word.
RCSJ: "why do people leave the church
well to hear tell from the people who have left the church it's because the people in the church are such horrible big fat jerks"
This is variant of strawman fallacy that I like to call "haters gonna hate" -- to construe all criticism as coming from a place of irrational "hatred" which therefore does not have to be addressed on substance.
Read 108 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(