I'm going to be contrarian here, but I think the Labour Party, especially the centre left, need to chill out.

It's extraordinary that @Keir_Starmer is being judged against precedent, as if Britain just had a normal year.
1/n
Britain just faced the biggest crisis since WW2 (and it's not over yet!), Boris Johnson could come out with post-9/11 Bush level ratings.

But.... he didn't.

So why is Starmer being compared to previous leaders when they didn't even come close to facing anything like this?
This election was framed by media from the start through the 'red wall' narrative.

But out there, it wasn't Brexit that dominated people's lives for the last year it was the pandemic.

In Wales, Labour was rewarded for managing the pandemic well. In Scotland, the SNP was.
In England, the government didn't even come close to reaping the benefits of a public rallying around the nation.

Under difficult circumstances, Keir Starmer held the line while facing rapidly shifting social change across Britain.

He did fine.
Moreover, everyone on Twitter thinks Labour should be constantly screaming about how awful the Tories are.

But the country doesn't. They didn't want to hear self-righteous Labour telling everyone, again, how we are always right.
Twitter wants the Labour party to be in a constant state of rage. I'm sorry, but the country doesn't. 🤷🏽‍♂️

Twitter (especially the hard left) is mistaking a university protest movement with people who want to be in charge of Britain's finances.
So, like I said, Labour's centre needs to calm the fuck down (yes, you too Mr @Andrew_Adonis!).

The hard left is going to stamp their feet at every opportunity. Fine. Let them do what they always do.

I don't see why the mainstream Labour Party is freaking out though.
That isn't to say Keir Starmer (and Labour) don't have issues.

But the issue isn't policy. It isn't about positioning.

The problem is we don't know how to talk to people or even embrace the people we want to vote for us
sunnyhundal.substack.com/p/labours-prob…
PS, on how the Brexit divide hit the election:

We live in an increasingly culturally polarised nation. That makes people less willing to listen to 'the other side' (yes, you too!)

That makes people who just voted Tory unwilling to listen to Labour. Changing minds will take time

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sunny Hundal

Sunny Hundal Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @sunny_hundal

9 May
Here's my write-up that NO ONE asked for and a topic you all love-hate.

This shouldn't be complicated and doesn't need some detailed policy analysis.

Labour just doesn't know how to talk to people. A bit like me as a teenager!
sunnyhundal.substack.com/p/labours-prob…
TL;DR

Detailed policies are a good goal. But we are putting the horse before the cart. The leader of the Labour party needs to know how to connect with people before he can get their vote. That doesn't come through policy. It comes by earning their trust first.
I’ve not been saying this for ages because, as some may remember, I believed Miliband could win by being a nice guy with nice policies. It didn't work.

Blair's genius wasn't policy. He knew how to connect with people. Corbyn was good at connecting with some, but not enough.
Read 6 tweets
15 Dec 20
Ok, a quick thread on why "calling out" racism doesn't work - when that's exactly what the far-right are looking for.

See these tweets by a prominent White Nationalist YouTuber for a start. They'll give you a clue.
Here we have a White Nationalist explicitly saying:

1) Their strategy is to hijack radio / TV shows and "use your anger to create publicity".

This is literally their aim. We played straight into them

2) Amazed that the Left has fallen into the trap of seeing Nazis everywhere.
This was also always the strategy of people like Katie Ho**ins, Lau***ce Fox, David Van** and a whole range of other grifters:

- to provoke and anger people on social media
- get attention
- be seen as the culture-warrior taking on the left
- make money.
Read 7 tweets
15 Dec 20
Some quick thoughts on Keir Starmer and racism and *that* LBC interview yesterday.

This will apply a lot over the next few years, so consider them ever-green tweets.
There will be times when Starmer won't react to rows on racism to how I would react.

But he has to pull together a broad coalition of voters, not me. Labour needs focus, discipline.

Stay away from culture wars. Labour doesn't need a civil war everytime Owen Jones thinks so.
On racism, I'm not convinced that "calling out" works most of the time. Depends on who is doing it and language they use.

To me it's like howling in the wind.

More specifically, it doesn't work when far-right are explicitly *looking* to get a reaction out of us.
Read 9 tweets
15 Dec 20
So, the not-politically-correct Home Office review on grooming gangs, ordered by not-politically-correct Sajid Javid, finds:

- grooming gangs came from diverse backgrounds
- "links between ethnicity and this form of offending" could not be proven 🤔🤔

independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/…
I first wrote about CSE around... 2004 (wow, 16 years now)... and how we need a full investigation into this topic instead of brushing it under the carpet, after a C4 doc on the topic got shelved.

I've always believed we need a proper investigation regardless of sensitivities.
Here is the key paragraphs, from a report with a foreword by PRITI PATEL (so don't say its trying to be politically correct!)

Full report:
assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…
Read 5 tweets
28 Sep 20
A thread on Andrew Neil and why I won't be celebrating his new broadcasting venture.

🧵
In 2014, Andrew Neil saw a news story on winter coming early to Tennessee and retweeted it with a sarcastic, “Damn you, global warming!!!!”

Scientists might say climate change creates the extreme temperature swings he was railing against but it would be a waste of time.
Andrew Neil has poured scorn on the idea of climate change for at least a decade.

The Spectator, a magazine he publishes, has toed that line too.

He used his platform at the BBC to push this nonsense too. He is a part of the reason BBC needed to have ‘balance’ on this debate.
Read 12 tweets
26 Sep 20
Watched 'Kiss the Ground' on Netflix last night.

It's a really interesting doc on how soil could do far more to capture CO2 and reverse the climate crisis than any other measure.

Odd to me that more focus isnt behind this?
Basic premise: the soil and plant growth captures far more carbon than any other system on earth.

But we are ruining soil and increasing desertification with awful industrial farming techniques.

But this can be reversed, increasing yields for farmers AND capturing more carbon.
Most campaigns on climate change focuses on reducing emissions (via fossil fuels).

But improving soil actually *reduces* CO2 in air in quite striking numbers, and increases biodiversity.

Feels like a no-brainer to me. Am I missing something? 🤯
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(