So used to be that if there was a gas shortage, prices would rise.
Wondering if we’re too stupid to let that happen now, like when NYC went after price gouging during COVID when prices needed to rise. We’d see demonization of gas stations, etc. Wouldn’t be surprised.
Looks like it’s happening, war on price gouging. The simplest stuff we learned decades ago has been forgotten, everything is democratized, which means run by the most hysterical voices on Twitter. Nice demonstration of how decline works in real time.
Coming from the top, encouraging citizens to become Cheka officers reporting the price system at work.
Did we do this during previous periods of high gas prices? Maybe we did, I genuinely don’t remember. But I suspect not, and this is part of a general trend towards “man on the street” news driven economics.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Wokeness is a fanatical faith that can’t be beat with nothing, i.e. going to back to liberalism 5 years ago or “common good” weirdness. The transcendent experience of parenthood as the center of a political and social ideology can do it, consistent with religion and science.
Nationalism is weak. That's why you need laws on migrants and tariffs, people won't sacrifice a dollar for their "nation." Historical trend has it losing to universalist ideologies: liberal internationalism, wokeness, Communism, Islamism, but they keep running into human nature
There was a slight sliver of history when from about 1789 to 1945, when technology was such that gov had a monopoly on propaganda and got people to die in large numbers for their countries without revolting (still need conscription). But that's not the norm, it was an aberration.
Skeptical take on the paper about fungus on Mars. Some parts of this critique are just appeals to authority, which I don’t like, but others seem more legitimate. I wonder what @robinhanson thinks. cnet.com/news/no-nasa-p…
Criticizes the guy for not publishing in peer reviewed journals, but when he does publish in one, the journalist who doesn’t like him gets it retracted. Heads I win, tails you lose?
We are told the paper used “inaccurate methodology,” but there is no explanation as to what is bad about the methodology, only insults and criticism of past work. That would’ve been a more valuable discussion than paragraph after paragraph about the prestige of different journals
This CIA recruitment video would be a little too much for a Chicana/o studies department. A collection of every campus buzzword in two minutes.
No wonder they wanted the last administration gone, now they can be themselves!
I like the part about not engaging in uptalk. This was written by a young person who really paid attention in college.
Soon after 9/11 American Dad! debuted, about a CIA agent who was supposed to be representative of his profession, a Fox News watching Bush supporter. As the series progressed the stereotype became out of date and the political angle of the show has been completely dropped.
Nice review, but few make the obvious connection between sexual selection, and how it's not only consistent with feminism, but the IDW position of "treat people as individuals." There's a kind (or many kinds) of PD here that gov or custom might solve. quillette.com/2021/04/30/whe…
Would like to see the source here! And hopefully a replication, if social desirability bias is a thing.
When female journalists report constantly feeling “unsafe” it probably accurately represents their mental state.
Believe it or not, when you run from the cops, who are responding to gun shots, with a gun in your hand, and then you raise that gun, bad things can happen.
Watch the video. Split second decision. The kid has the gun in his hands, drops it behind the fence and then turns around, completely reasonable for the cop to believe that the kid was turning around to shoot him. vimeo.com/536331629