1/ @Excellion: “The #bitcoin is bad for the environment narrative has been lurking around for some time. More recently it has come to prominence because of bitcoin’s rise in prominence. This brings along all FUD; Tether, Mining etc.
2/ the reason why #bitcoin mining is a target for this FUD is because it’s so easy to calculate the energy consumption of the network because it’s transparent. You can see how many THs it is, you can calculate how many machines there are, and how much electricity it would consume
3/ whereas with the traditional financial system you have a very opaque layer over everything. You just don’t know how much it costs to produce and transport cash from production to bank vaults, atms etc. And how much energy the banking system consumes with data centres,
4/ offices and bank branches, physical security. It’s a tonne of things that are involved in the operational of the legacy financial system that are not easy to calculate so #bitcoin’s transparency makes it a much easier target.” - @Excellion paraphrased
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
- You need to have US$130,000+ to become a validator.
- the average person can’t run a node at home.
- the protocol hard forks at the beck and calling of a minority of participants.
Most people don’t care about decentralisation
2/ even though this is one of the main factors that differentiated #bitcoin from our current political and financial systems.
3/ the worst thing is that there is such a lack of education around other crypto assets vs #bitcoin. Everyone knows the bitcoin buzzwords and then they apply them to all other crypto assets even though they don’t apply. “Decentralised” is a great example of this.