Listening to past Labour leaders who have spectacularly not won elections attempting to advise a current labour leader on how to win them, is like asking Icarus for flying lessons.
I haven't the answer. But I can start with a version of the problem.
<thread>1/10
Only three Labour leaders have *EVER* won an election: 1) Attlee - immediately after the war, when the population felt like winners on a run of winning
2) 'White heat of technology' - Wilson
3) Education, education, education, opportunity and aspiration - Blair
2/10
No Labour leader has *ever* won appealing to the masses to realise, finally, that they are poor stupid oppressed losers needing a helping hand; 'a govt of the losers, for the losers, by the losers' is hardly going to rally the nation in a tide of optimism.
3/10
Chasing red wall voters, (while at best taking for granted others, at worst telling them they're wrong) on the basis they're poor things who need sensible help from careful Labour more than they need mad over-optimism from slapdash Tories is doomed to failure. Rightly.
4/10
And sure, for the many not the few is philosophically, morally, politically right. But who's one of the many? Not me. Not you. We're proud. Millions of us, even with desperate lives, still don't want labelling as just 'one of the many'.
5/10
Especially the young. We're telling them there's no actual hope beyond minimising suffering and injustice? That they're just the many, like everyone? That getting by is a victory in itself? They need more than palliative care for society and the planet. They need real hope.
6/10
The Labour Party at the moment, current versions - Corbyn, Starmer, both - looks like a token opposition preserved for the nation from the 20th Century to provide cover for a clearly degraded democracy so that it looks like one that functions fine.
7/10
Who's got the big, non-establishment, planet-saving, best friends with our EU cousins, technological white heat, education-focused, energetic, optimistic, aspirational, ultra competent, inclusive, enabling, hopeful, new, and above all, history-defying, vision on the Left?
8/10
You don't know? Nor do I. Sorry. But until we do, we're done as a country, as a society and as a party. We're tokenistic, doing no more than propping up an old idea that's producing a corrupt elite determined to rid themselves of any checks and balances whatsoever.
9/10
Btw, it sounds like I do, but I don't, blame Brown, Miliband, Corbyn, Starmer personally. Well, perhaps a bit ahem. But they at least tried. I didn't. I'm not a politician. If we want democracy, we've got to have politicians.
They're not all the same. They're not all bad.
10/10
I think I'll add another thought.
There's a thing here I predict no-one will like - not Corbyn left nor Starmer left (I refuse to call anyone in Labour Right).
One living leader did win elections. One. Repeatedly. Even once he was hated.
Thassit.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Elizabeth still a citizen of the EU. Still #FBPE.

Elizabeth still a citizen of the EU. Still #FBPE. Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ElizabethBangs

31 Dec 19
OK @uklabour let's actually start a period of reflection.

1. "We won the argument."

No. We didn't. We lost the argument, the argument was derided, the argument was mocked and ridiculed, there was utter contempt for the argument.
Therefore, we were slaughtered as predicted.
2. "It wasn't Corbyn it was Brexit."

They were one and the same. Brexit crap was Corbyn crap, Corbyn crap was Brexit crap. Everyone could see Corbyn was conflicted and had rationalised the situation into pretending indecision was conciliation. It was transparent nonsense.
3. "MSM was biased. Corbyn was attacked unfairly."

This is not a zero-sum game of media/Corbyn. The media *was* biased. But a leader's job is to have a strategy to deal with this. None was evident. Milne's £100k a year job was strategy and communications; what was he doing?
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(