Fifteen Thoughts On Palestine

"You don't get to drop an entire colony on top of an inhabited country, grind those inhabitants into the dirt for generations, and then claim self defense every time they retaliate. That's not a thing."
caitlinjohnstone.substack.com/p/fifteen-thou…
The US-centralized power alliance in general is a gargantuan globe-spanning juggernaut that feeds on rivers of human blood and every time its victims try to escape from its fangs it shows up on the news sobbing that it is merely defending itself.
I'm building a new house. There were people living where I wanted to build it, so I just started building it on top of them. They tried to stop me so I had to kill them for being terrorists. If you disagree with my actions you're basically a Nazi. My house has a right to exist.
A nation is not a person, a nation is an abstract concept. It doesn't have a "right to exist". It doesn't have a "right to defend itself". PEOPLE have the right to these things, and a nation is only legitimate insofar as it advances those rights. For ALL people.
People who condemn Palestinian retaliations against their oppressors have no real answers for what Palestinians should do instead besides "nothing" and "die".
A nation that cannot exist without nonstop warfare is not a real nation, it's an ongoing military operation that happens to have suburbs.
- Create a permanent ethnic underclass.

- Take everything from them.

- Rob them of reasons to live.

- Oppress them.

- Abuse them.

- Kill them.

- Bomb the shit out of them.

- Call on them to stop fighting you.

- Say you just want peace.
Let's all please get very clear on this:
Israel is losing control of the narrative because there are only so many viral videos of unconscionable brutality that can be dismissed with "Actually this is way more complicated than it looks."
When one side's arguments consist of sharing raw video footage and the other side's arguments consist of saying "Actually this is more complicated than it looks", it should be obvious to everyone that the latter side is in the wrong.
It's like the cheating spouse caught in the act saying "This isn't what it looks like!" Uhh, yeah it is. All the information is right there, you're just managing the perception of that information.
When I left an abusive relationship I told people he raped me, he hit me, he psychologically and financially abused me, while he told people that it's actually quite complicated. In my experience that's generally the case when one side defends abuses with "it's complicated"...
... from my ex to Israeli apartheid to John Bolton defending the Iraq invasion.
Awareness is spreading of Israeli apartheid brutality for the same reason awareness is spreading of US police brutality: the internet combined with smartphone cameras. Seeing is believing. Seeing brings change. That's why the powerful are working so hard to censor the internet.
- Impose an apartheid ethnostate which punishes Arabs for European crimes.

- Abuse them until they hate you.

- Cite their hatred as evidence that you need your apartheid ethnostate to protect you from hate.
Palestine is one of those precious few areas where there's an obvious clear-cut right side and wrong side and it's possible to just take the right side and be objectively unassailably correct, but because of decades of pro-Israel propaganda most people still fuck it up.
I don't know who needs to hear this but accusing someone of antisemitism for valid criticisms of a brutal apartheid regime is odious and disgusting and is becoming increasingly recognized as such all around the world.
If social media and liberals had existed in the fifteenth through nineteenth centuries there would've been frequent condemnations of "violence on both sides" in the genocidal settler colonialism of the Americas, Africa, and Australia.
Once you accept that religious texts are made up nonsense from ancient historical contexts that have no relevance to the present, Zionism just looks like one more instance of white people butchering yet another indigenous population in order to take their land.
Zionism is a white supremacist ideology. It is white supremacist in the way it is weaponized against Arabs and Persians by western Christian fundamentalists and western war hawks, AND it is white supremacist in the way it manifests in Israel itself:
A nation that can't exist without nonstop warfare is like a house that can't stand without nonstop construction work. If your house would collapse without construction teams working on it 24/7 forever, you'd either (A) move or (B) come up with a different architectural design.
Fifteen Thoughts On Palestine (Audio)

soundcloud.com/going_rogue/fi…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Caitlin Johnstone ⏳

Caitlin Johnstone ⏳ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @caitoz

13 May
When I left an abusive relationship I told people he raped me, he hit me, he psychologically and financially abused me, while he told people that it's actually quite complicated. In my experience that's generally the case when one side defends abuses with "it's complicated".
You see it over and over again, the party that's obviously in the wrong trying to make their abuses look complicated when they are quite simple. You see it with Israeli abuses of the Palestinians, you saw it when John Bolton defends the Iraq invasion:
"It's complicated." No, usually it's quite simple, especially when the accused abuser is in the up-power position.
Read 4 tweets
11 May
The Israel Narrative Is Crumbling Because Of Phone Cameras And The Internet

There are only so many viral videos of unconscionable acts that can be dismissed with "Actually this is way more complicated than it looks."
caitlinjohnstone.substack.com/p/the-israel-n…
"Twenty-four people, including nine children, were killed in Gaza overnight, most of them in Israeli strikes," reads a new report from AP.
apnews.com/article/middle…
Nine children, killed with the help of United States funding to the tune of $3.8 billion a year.

Remember kids, the US loves Muslims and just wants to protect their human rights.
caitlinjohnstone.substack.com/p/the-entire-w…
Read 29 tweets
10 May
Israel is losing control of the narrative because there are only so many viral videos of unconscionable brutality that can be dismissed with "Actually this is way more complicated than it looks."
A big part of the difficulty in controlling the narrative is that Israeli apartheid isn't something that's being managed by a few elites, it's got rank-and-file people upholding it who don't know it's bad narrative management to do shit like this on camera
Back when plutocratic media outlets had the narratives locked down, they could ensure everyone was only seeing what the empire wants seen. Smartphone cameras and the internet shattered this paradigm. @Jonathan_K_Cook shared his ideas on this recently here:
jonathan-cook.net/blog/2021-05-1…
Read 5 tweets
10 May
"Moving the Democratic Party to the left via primaries and electoral engagement is the easiest way to advance progressive change."

Sure it's easy. So is praying for progressive change, or wishing upon a star for it. Just because something is easy doesn't mean it's real.
It's like that old joke where a drunk guy is looking for his keys under a streetlight at night and a cop sees him and helps him look.
"You sure this is where you lost them?" the cop asks after a while.
"No I lost them down the road, but this is where the light is."
Or that scene from The Land Before Time where one dinosaur knows where to go but the road is hard, and the other dinosaur is like "This way's too hard, I'm going an easier way" but it's the opposite direction from where they need to be.
Read 4 tweets
8 May
Q: What is a tankie?

A: A tankie is someone who chooses to focuses most of their foreign policy criticisms on the most powerful and destructive government in the world.
If that were true people wouldn't call people like me a tankie all the time.
"That's not what tankie means!"

It's the way that term is now used. I've got nothing to do with Stalinism; I'm not even a Marxist. My opposition to imperialist agendas against Russia and China have nothing to do with communism whatsoever. Yet I get called a tankie every day.
Read 6 tweets
8 May
Western journalists learn very quickly that they can only advance their careers by promoting narratives that are favorable to US imperialism.
This is how propaganda occurs in the west. It's not that Jeff Bezos emails WaPo employees saying "Promote US wars!", it's that only reporters who protect imperialism see their careers rise. "If you believed something else, you wouldn't be sitting here."
This is why you see blue-checkmarked reporters tweeting in service of imperialist narratives and smearing leftists and anti-imperialists. They're not (usually) being paid to tweet that stuff; they're promoting their career by signalling that they'll protect the establishment.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(