To the three westerners who are interested in what's actual happening in Israel/Gaza and not just in moral grandstanding and tribal signaling, here's my read of the situation with minimum moralizing. Moralizing above the minimum will be blocked.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2021_Isra…
The official story is that tension sparked over planned evictions of Palestinians from a few homes in East Jerusalem that according to some documents belonged to Jews in the 19th century. However, this was planned since 2009, why start shit now?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sheikh_Ja…
The more likely proximate cause is the cancelation of planned elections in the West Bank. The PLO (which governs the West Bank) is on shaky ground and is worried that elections would lead to a forceful takeover by Hamas, like what happened in Gaza in 2006.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2021_Pale…
So on May 10 the Hamas and Islamic Jihad launched a barrage of rockets at Israeli cities, to demonstrate internally that they're stronger than the PLO and are the only ones still taking the fight to Israel and carrying the cause of Jihad. All politics is internal.
In the time since the last war in Gaza Hamas has built up large weapon stores and infrastructure including new missiles that can reach Tel Aviv, explosive-carrying drones, tunnels for smuggling and raiding, and more. Most of it is paid for by Iran.
So while Hamas was hoping for a quick show of strength aimed at the West Bank, Israel now has casus belli to go in and disarm Hamas assuming that these rockets and drones will fly at Israel sooner or later. So it's preparing a ground operation to blow up tunnels and launchers.
Of course, most Gazans are basically just caught in the crossfire. Hamas doesn't ask their permission to put launchers on the roof and tunnels in the basement, the IDF doesn't ask before going in to destroy them. Both sides are blaming their deaths on the other.
This round will end when enough Hamas military resources are neutralized to stop the rockets flying, which could take several weeks and hundreds of deaths. It's unlikely that this will pose an actual challenge to Hamas' continued iron rule of Gaza, so no long term change.
Separately, there have been incidents of violence within Israel proper between Muslim and Jewish citizens, which everyone is generally just kinda stunned by and is hoping that it's just an isolated thing and not a trend. Except that...
Israel hasn't been able to form a ruling coalition after several elections. Last week an agreement was close that would include both a right-wing party (Bennet) and the joint-list party of Arab Israelis (Abbas). Except that given the violence, both parties are now backing away.
So Bibi is acting Israeli PM except he could be replaced any day by a new coalition, Abu Mazen rules the West Bank except he's always on thin ice, Hamas rules Gaza except they're being hunted by the IDF. So everyone's fighting but no one is securely in charge of any of the sides.
So if you're wondering why everyone from DC to Dubai is spouting platitudes and refusing to engage, it's because no one wants any part of this horrible, hopeless mess. No one has any workable plan for Gaza that would prevent this sort of thing happening every few years. 😢
Oh, right, there's one organization that always wants to be part of horrible messes. Given that the rockets missed the entire country and landed at sea it's still unclear whether this is a lone wolf, an empty signal, or Hezbollah jumping into the fray.
reuters.com/world/middle-e…
Hezbollah of course are also backed by Iran, and Israel recently got much cozier with the anti-Iran axis of Egypt-Saudi-Emirates. So this conflict is at once about one house in East Jerusalem and about multinational coalitions across the Middle East.
reuters.com/article/us-isr…
Anyway, I'm sure the brilliant plan you came up with last night would immediately resolve all these interlocking conflicts, punish the wicked, uplift the oppressed, and bring a golden century of peace to the Middle East. It's all so simple, isn't it?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Putanumonit Jacob

Putanumonit Jacob Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @yashkaf

7 May
For financial decisions you should think of yourself as a stock with a market price that reflects all your future earning and spending. This number is much more important that your current income or net worth, and yet everyone focuses on the latter because they're legible.
Let's say you're 25, can write a bit and do Excel and deal with corporate culture. This gives you a 80% chance of having a $50k+ job in a given year. If you plan to work for 25 years, this set of intangible assets is worth ~$1,000,000 to you. Your net worth is peanuts next to it.
This means that if you can go to a top MBA or coding camp and double your base salary, you should be willing to take $100k in debt to do it because it will increase your "market cap" by another million at least. You get 10x payoff, or at least 5x if you discount for uncertainty.
Read 8 tweets
7 May
I'm rereading @DouthatNYT's "The Decadent Society" and taking notes for a long review I want to write. In the meantime, you can follow this thread for random thoughts and hot takes as I go through it.
Decadence = Economic stagnation, institutional decay, cultural and intellectual exhaustion and repetition at a high level of material prosperity and technological development.

Doesn't necessarily lead to immediate collapse — Rome survived for 400 years after Nero.
Douthat is an American conservative, Catholic, NY Times columnist — ancient and lumbering institutions that are certainly decadent. So while his diagnosis it true for the world he lives in, that's not necessarily true for Westerners outside these institutions.
Read 13 tweets
9 Apr
"Our culture is sex-positive, so how come sex is so bad/hard/impossible?"

The truth is that sex-positivity, in the sense of talking about the positive aspects of good sex, is incredibly rare. Modern culture(s) is overwhelmingly sex-negative.
Conservatives are sex negative. They talk about sex as something corrupting, dangerous, sinful. Just try to talk to someone who goes on about "family values" about the importance for marriage of good, hot sex, let alone kinky one.
Progressives are sex negative. They talk about sex as harassment, grooming, exploitation. They only distinction they care about is consensual/non-consensual, but "consent" isn't close to covering the entirety of ethics surrounding sex, let alone actual eroticism.
Read 11 tweets
25 Mar
Things I'm tempted to block people for as I get ever further from the perfect number of followers (3000). A thread that I'm afraid will be ongoing:
Block people who reply "no" or "you're wrong" with no further comment.
Block people who reply to a Twitter poll with something that boils down to "why didn't you have a fifth option?"
Read 10 tweets
13 Mar
Imagine a classic fantasy setting. Warriors start out formidable but their ceiling is limited. Wizards spend years in a tower or academy just to catch up. But the strongest wizards are much stronger than any warrior, so the strongest wizards rule the land.
tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.…
Twist: it turns out that the wizard's magic depends on popular belief in their abilities. If everyone knows a wizard can cast a fireball, it explodes in a blaze. If too many people doubt it, it fizzles out in a puff of smoke. Suddenly, the people begin to doubt the wizards.
As magic begins to weaken, the wizards spend more and more years in the academies with fewer visible results. The more they fail the more people doubt. And so the mightiest wizards on the ruling council devise a strategy: they must eliminate the people's doubt to retain power.
Read 6 tweets
12 Mar
So we mock and shame guys who say they WON'T defend women and now we've also decided to mock and shame guys who say they WILL defend women so... uh... I'm sure this Twitter meme is making women more safe in some complex way my limited guy brain can't comprehend yet.
So if I actually shared some stories of me and my friends stopping "our mates" from harassing girls I'll have a bunch of men telling me I'm a white knight simp and a bunch of women telling me I'm a lying keyboard-warrior hypocrite. So I won't. And my friends won't.
And then everyone wonders why it's not a common norm that men should be responsible for policing their fellows, when any men who says anything at all publicly on the subject get shit from all sides.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(