(🆚) NEW: With today's bombshell news about a scheme involving Barbara Ledeen and Erik Prince to run covert domestic intel operations to aid Trump, I'm releasing—for PROOF subscribers—a never-before-seen chapter on Ledeen from my book Proof of Corruption. sethabramson.substack.com/p/the-lost-cha…
1/ I was heartbroken when I had to cut this chapter on Flynn and the Ledeens from Proof of Corruption (Macmillan, 2020), though I certainly didn't blame Macmillan for it—as the book was around 70,000 words (not a typo!) over where it was originally *expected* to be at that time.
2/ As PROOF (the Substack) didn't exist back in Spring 2020, I had nowhere to put the chapter—nothing to do with it but toss it, or so I thought then—so I first made desperate attempts to edit it down to a manageable size, hoping it could still be included in Proof of Corruption.
3/ That's one reason the chapter I just published at PROOF is shorter than the chapter would've been. (It's also why—once it was cut—I imagined it as being part of a fourth book in the Proof series, though I quickly realized that there was no narrative it would fit easily into.)
4/ One of the scariest things established by the Proof trilogy (Proof of Collusion, 2018; Proof of Conspiracy, 2019; Proof of Corruption, 2020) is that Trump had a cybersecurity team willing to do *anything* to get him into power and keep him there. Flynn was at the heart of it.
5/ The Ledeens are Flynn associates who were looking to illegally bring *foreign intelligence services* into the 2016 presidential campaign as early as mid-2015. And that's the story this chapter tells.

In doing so, it also dramatically inflects today's New York Times bombshell.
6/ Trump knew what Flynn and his crew were up to in 2015 and 2016, as established (repeatedly) by the Proof trilogy. And what did he do? He made Flynn his National Security Advisor, and, as we now know, Prince and Ledeen had a place running *domestic* intelligence ops for Trump.
7/ This makes Watergate look like a day at a kids' water park.
8/ In short, all the evidence suggests that Donald Trump summoned Flynn to Trump Tower in August 2015—later lying about *every single aspect of that meeting*—precisely *because* he believed that clandestine cybersecurity operations would be necessary to his presidential campaign.
9/ That Steve Bannon was privy to all of these plans, schemes, and agendas in Summer 2016 isn't just relevant to his and Trump's and Flynn's and Prince's attempts to steal the 2016 election, but even to events *many* years hence—like Trump's last-minute decision to pardon Bannon.
10/ What I don't touch upon in "Flynn and the Ledeens" is something else that needs to be said in light of this NYT report: as the Proof trilogy establishes, the Saudis and Emiratis repeatedly got involved in trying to oust Rex Tillerson from his position. So now that we know...
11/ ...that there was a clandestine domestic intelligence operation aimed at ousting another Trump pick neither the Saudis nor Emiratis would have been happy with—largely because he opposed everything Jared Kushner was doing—and that those behind that operation were looking to...
12/ ...work with foreign intelligence services—see the chapter at the link—as early as mid-2015 to help Trump, and given that Prince was *literally working for the Emirati government at the time*, one has to wonder, how many *foreign nationals* were behind the McMaster operation?
13/ In short—not to put too fine a point on it—I have 2,500 pages of national-bestselling, fully-sourced nonfiction on Donald Trump's clandestine intelligence operations that says that the New York Times has only scratched the surface here. They've reported the tip of an iceberg.
14/ It simply can't be credited that Emirati agent Erik Prince, who approached the Trump family at Trump Tower in August 2016 to offer Emirati election aid—as reported by the NYT!—would then be tied to intel work for Trump in 2017 and *not* have it be connected to the Emiratis.
15/ This is especially true given that—in that same year—the Emiratis and Saudis were meddling in Trump's Cabinet by way of trying to get Tillerson fired. (Why? Because Tillerson opposed MBS's desired ground invasion of Qatar; see The Intercept on this.) So why not McMaster, too?
END/ So as is always the case with complex news—and is the reason curatorial journalism exists and is practiced daily at PROOF—the NYT story is big, but when networked with other major-media stories it becomes... monumental. This "lost chapter" is a key part of the Ledeen story.
PS/ If you believe the lie below, I respectfully suggest you have your head examined...

NYT: "In an interview, Ledeen said 'someone she trusted' contacted her to help with the plan. She said she could not remember who."

(1) She remembers.
(2) Dollars-to-donuts, Flynn or Prince.
PS2/ By no means was this a domestic "honeypot" intelligence operation against America's sitting National Security Advisor! I post the below picture of the woman they planned to send at McMaster *for no reason whatsoever*.

(She lives in *Dallas*...now go see the "lost chapter.")
PS3/ I swear that when I wrote about Dallas in my annotations to the lost chapter I had somehow missed that Tarah Price lives there. I only discovered that on my second read of the NYT article. Could be a coincidence, but if you follow Flynn and Prince's circles... it's unlikely.
PS4/ Sharp-eyed folks will note the hole in the "lost chapter"—Lofgren. Yes, the original Chapter 6 did a deep dive on how the Ledeens would have wanted to work with Lofgren because of his access to KGB-cum-FSB intelligence sources. The dive was... *deep*. apnews.com/article/68bef1…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Seth Abramson

Seth Abramson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SethAbramson

15 May
(THREAD) Most of us—for our own health—don't track the evolution of right-wing rhetoric. I do so because it's part of my beat. The most common words and phrases in public Trumpist rhetoric are these 5:

đź“› "WE THE PEOPLE"
đź“› "PATRIOTS"
đź“› "1776"
đź“› "FIGHT"
đź“› "RADICAL SOCIALISM"
1/ Noticed I say "right-wing" rather than "far-right." This is not a matter of fringe rhetoric anymore. This is GOP rhetoric. This is what you'll hear from House GOP leadership every bit as much as paramilitary extremists and white nationalists. Their rhetoric has been conjoined.
2/ Many years ago, I went on a vacation to China with my girlfriend and a good friend. One of the things I was struck by is how frequently the Communist Party uses the word "people" in its public rhetoric. The GOP *also* uses that word as propaganda, but in a very different way.
Read 51 tweets
13 May
(🆚) BREAKING NEWS: Donald Trump's top aides are lying about the events of January 5—Insurrection Eve—yet again, but this time it's the former Secretary of Defense, and the lies were told to Congress. I hope you'll subscribe to PROOF, read on, and RETWEET. sethabramson.substack.com/p/breaking-new…
1/ I was a criminal investigator in the federal criminal justice system in DC. Then I practiced criminal law—up to first-degree murder cases—in two jurisdictions. And I'm telling you now, as I've said for months, that the events of January 5 are *critical* to those of January 6.
2/ January 5—in the PM—is the most lied-about sequence of events in the whole insurrection timeline. More lies have been told by Trump agents about January 5 than about January 6, and when you read the dozens of articles at PROOF on this subject, you develop a clear sense of why.
Read 11 tweets
13 May
(🆚) America needs a *comprehensive monthly update* on breaking news related to Donald Trump's ongoing insurrection. Now it has one, via PROOF. I hope you will subscribe, read on, and RETWEET. My hope is that this monthly summary will become indispensable. sethabramson.substack.com/p/insurrection…
1/ These updates will be released monthly, but I will *also* backfill the current update should previously unincluded news be found (as a network of scores of readers periodically send me articles I and most others may have missed). The goal is to have this be essential reading.
2/ I've said before, and I continue to believe, that after the COVID-19 pandemic, the Trumpist insurrection is the top news story in the United States. Like the pandemic, it touches on almost everything: the economy, democracy, voting rights, American culture, and so much more.
Read 9 tweets
12 May
At this point I'm becoming wary of many of the tweets about what's happening in Israel. I keep seeing context-less photos and videos from blue checkmarks—partisans of both sides of the conflict—that make stunning conclusory claims that are not linked to any major-media reporting.
Still images not linked to reporting can be misleading or they can be representative. There's just no way to know from simply seeing one on Twitter. Likewise, video that shows a building being destroyed is awful at one level if it's occupied and another if it was evacuated first.
One thing is clear: the violence must stop. Now. Aggressive actions that target civilians or create an identifiable risk of civilian casualties must stop immediately. Good-faith brokers need to be on-scene to push diplomacy and aid workers and UN observers should be present also.
Read 8 tweets
12 May
Sometimes even I have to remind myself that the 2020 presidential election wasn't even close. I mean we all know that Joe Biden won by *well over* 7 million votes, but look at what that breaks down to:

🟦 BIDEN: 51.3%
🟥 TRUMP: 46.8%

In modern political terms, that's a blowout.
(PS) I understand people point to the Electoral College and note that—even with the blowout there—a hundred fifty thousand votes or so could have swung the election. True. And an *even smaller number of votes* would have swung the 2000, 2004, and 2016 elections for the Democrats.
(PS2) So if you take the last six presidential elections, at least half of them—I haven't gone back to review 2008 and 2012—were decided in the Electoral College by fewer popular votes than 2020. That means that, historically, *even by that measure* this was not a close election.
Read 6 tweets
12 May
The most comprehensive media coverage of the January 6 insurrection is at PROOF.

Period.

Click through yourself and see. Sethabramson.substack.com
(PS) What the insurrectionist Republicans in Congress are (willfully) missing: Yes, elements of the insurrection were planned prior to January 6—but those elements were coordinating with Trump agents, so the fact of a pre-planned conspiracy in no way absolves Trump or his agents.
(PS2) It's because of the insufficiency of media coverage of the January 6 insurrection that Republicans are now able to get away with the canard that elements of the insurrection planned prior to January 6 somehow prove that Trump and his agents weren't involved.

It's insanity.
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(