It’s my take that we’ve been in a secular bull market since May 2013, when the S&P 500 finally hit a new all-time high after a decade of sideways action, which included two major 50%-plus drawdowns. So what lies ahead? (THREAD/1)
Here’s the super long-term trend for the inflation-adjusted S&P 500 total return index since 1871. Historically, the market tends to swing around this central trend line like a pendulum. The pendulum is always in motion, like the tide. /2
At the 2009 secular low, the SPX was 47% below the trend line. It is currently 42% above. At past secular bull market peaks (1968 and 2000), the index was about 100% above trend. Therefore... /3
By that measure, the market could still double from here. That would put the SPX at 8000 when this is all said and done. When? The past two super cycles lasted 19 years (1949-68) and 18 years (1982-2000). So, perhaps 2026 or 2027. /4
Here is a chart of the cumulative real return. Again, to me, it suggests a potential 2x move from current levels. /END

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jurrien Timmer

Jurrien Timmer Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TimmerFidelity

13 May
Predicting inflation trends isn't simple these days. Before this century, whenever the money supply soared, inflation tended to follow. However, the pattern hasn’t continued since the 2000s. (THREAD/1)
Why doesn’t inflation always track with money supply anymore? Demographics. Whatever inflation seeds are being sown by policy makers need to overcome powerful demographics-induced deflationary forces. /2
Here’s the same chart with the growth rate of the US labor force added in the bottom panel. See a pattern? When money growth was rampant during the '70s, the labor force was growing. Now money supply is growing fast again, but labor force growth is declining. /3
Read 5 tweets
12 May
The cyclical inflation we are seeing in the economy now is causing commodities to soar, as this chart shows: (THREAD/1)
The new bull market for commodities appears to come at the exact right time from a long-term, super-cycle perspective. The low in the Commodity Research Bureau (CRB) Index last year was perfectly timed in terms of the long cycle. /2
Will it last? The commodity super-cycle chart above certainly suggests so. And when we consider the current fiscal/monetary environment, we can imagine why this could go on. /3
Read 4 tweets
12 May
What next for inflation? Key question. Inflation drives correlation between stocks & bonds. This chart shows the 10-year annualized inflation rate on the horizontal axis & the 5-year correlation between the S&P 500 and the Barclays LT Govt bond index on the vertical. (THREAD/1)
For the past 20 years or so, inflation has been in the sweet spot to produce the most negative correlation possible, which in turn has made the 60/40 portfolio model so successful. /2
However: Since 1900, whenever the long-term inflation rate was above average, the correlation has almost always been positive. A traditional 60/40 model (SPX/Agg) was not the ideal mix during those times. Cash and gold were better for diversification than long bonds. /3
Read 4 tweets
11 May
They’re baaaack: The “sell in May” crowd is motivated by the stock market’s tendency to produce the best returns from mid-October through May and the worst returns during the summer and early fall. Here's how that strategy has fared since 1970. (THREAD/1)
Over the past 50 years, the indicator has worked quite well (before accounting for transaction costs, taxes and turnover, all of which could be formidable). The table below (left) shows the data. /2
Since 1970, the SPX has produced a CAGR of 10.84% against a volatility of 14.1, in the process producing a Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The batting average was 64%. But SPX/cash, stocks/bonds and SPX/UTL all did better than that. /3
Read 9 tweets
29 Apr
If the pace of improvement for the economy has topped out and further gains will come at a slower pace—if we have reached "peak reopening" in other words—how might the markets react? Let's break it down: THREAD/1
If the current cycle mirrors what happened in 2010 and 1943—and I see many similarities—I wouldn't be surprised by a 10-15% correction in the market, as well as a counter-rotation back into the big growers. /2
Look at the spread between the percentage of Russell 2000 stocks trading above their 50-day average vs. the same for the S&P 500. Something broke for small caps a few weeks ago, right when the Weekly Economic Index reached its peak rate of change. /3
Read 6 tweets
28 Apr
The U.S. economy is rapidly reopening from lockdowns, which is great news, especially since China and other Asian countries reopened a while ago. But, how much of this has already been discounted by the markets? THREAD/1
My sense is that we have reached "peak reopening" and that markets already have priced it in. As you see here, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s weekly economic index (WEI) is still rising, but at a slower rate. /2
As the previous chart shows, it was exactly a year ago that the rate of change in the WEI bottomed out. This was the very same week that the stock market bottomed out, too. It’s always about the rate of change. /3
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(