The content of email written by student considered as derogatory remarks and her apology letter. Sadly, she has to go through such a turmoil.
Remarks by High Court which should enable ICAI ( us ) to introspect the internal system and accountability.
(1/n)
Remarks by High Court which should enable ICAI ( us ) to introspect the internal system and accountability.
(1/n)
A perusal of the e-mail sent by the petitioner
reveals that the same was addressed to President and
other office bearers and not to the Exam Committee. Hence, the EC ought not have taken cognizance of an e-mail sent to the President, unless the President directed it to do so.
reveals that the same was addressed to President and
other office bearers and not to the Exam Committee. Hence, the EC ought not have taken cognizance of an e-mail sent to the President, unless the President directed it to do so.
That apart, in the opinion of this Court, there is hardly
anything in the e-mail, for which it can be considered as
or even construed to be derogatory.
The very initiation of the proceedings alleging that the e-mail contains derogatory remarks was uncalled for and unwarranted
anything in the e-mail, for which it can be considered as
or even construed to be derogatory.
The very initiation of the proceedings alleging that the e-mail contains derogatory remarks was uncalled for and unwarranted
As Voltaire said, “With great power comes great
responsibility”.The Institute which is adorned with enormous power to elevate or uplift the lives of vulnerable & struggling students, is required to practice greater restraint in invoking its powers especially against the students
responsibility”.The Institute which is adorned with enormous power to elevate or uplift the lives of vulnerable & struggling students, is required to practice greater restraint in invoking its powers especially against the students
It is rather disturbing that the petitioner was personally
heard on 10.3.2021 yet no order was ever communicated/supplied to her. She came to know that her result had been cancelled that too, citing “adopted unfair means”.
heard on 10.3.2021 yet no order was ever communicated/supplied to her. She came to know that her result had been cancelled that too, citing “adopted unfair means”.
The impugned decision cancelling petitioner’s result is
nothing short of colourable exercise of powers. It also showcases vindictiveness of respondent Committee.
This Court is unable to accept any excuse
offered by the respondents for not even communicating the
decision.
nothing short of colourable exercise of powers. It also showcases vindictiveness of respondent Committee.
This Court is unable to accept any excuse
offered by the respondents for not even communicating the
decision.
While hoping that in future the Institute will not take any
such action and take any criticism in positive stride, this Court
hastens to add that a professional body like the respondent
Institute should introspect and ensure that its overenthusiasm..
such action and take any criticism in positive stride, this Court
hastens to add that a professional body like the respondent
Institute should introspect and ensure that its overenthusiasm..
.. of attaining professional excellence and endevours of setting high standards of discipline should not silence rather stifle the speech of a student or its member in the manner that has been done in the present case.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
