"If no one is getting sick and spread is controlled since the first event, then in some ways a re-exposure may not be a bad thing but rather can be seen as immunological training." (1/x) nymag.com/intelligencer/…
"Is it ideal? No, of course we want this damn virus to be eliminated..."
"But, frankly, if I am entirely vaccinated and those around me are vaccinated and I was asked in a few months 'Do you want to be asymptomatically exposed?' there is a world where I might say 'Yes.'
"Getting exposed while otherwise protected can boost the depth and breadth of my immune response for years to come and might even improve my ability to deal with variants." (x/x)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David Wallace-Wells

David Wallace-Wells Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @dwallacewells

19 May
“While their sisters, who have nearly identical genomes, perish within months of being born, these death-defying insects live on for years and years and years.” (1/x)
“They are Temnothorax ants, and their elixirs of life are the tapeworms that teem within their bellies—parasites that paradoxically prolong the life of their host at a strange and terrible cost.”
“Infected Temnothorax ants live at least three times longer than their siblings, and perhaps more. No one is sure when the insects’ longevity tops out, but the answer is probably in excess of a decade, approaching or matching that of ant queens, who can survive for 20 years.”
Read 6 tweets
28 Apr
“Many residents in one of the Bay Area's most popular day-trip destinations are being told that they may need to abandon their homes as sea levels rise.” Stinson Beach is a fascinating case study in adaptation and retreat (1/x). sfgate.com/local/article/…
“Studies show that numerous homes in Stinson Beach will flood with just one foot of sea rise, an unavoidable result of human-caused climate change. Data from NOAA projects that this will likely happen in under 20 years.”
“Six years ago, residents in two of the lowest lying neighborhoods in Stinson Beach — Calles and the Sonoma-Patio — received notice from the county informing them that sea level rise would ‘have an impact on their ability to get permits for improvements on their properties.’”
Read 7 tweets
21 Apr
"For all the admirable sophistication of its targeting, there is one outstanding and all-important question: is the investment program big enough, and will it actually reduce emissions?" The great @adam_tooze gives the Biden Jobs plan a close read. (1/x) newstatesman.com/world/north-am…
"At a generous estimate, half of the $2trn to $2.7trn is devoted to tackling the climate crisis. Spreading $1trn to $1.3trn over eight years comes to around 0.5 per cent of current GDP annually. That is far short of any reasonable estimate of the investment needed."
"The Bernie Sanders camp, backed by the writer and activist Bill McKibben’s 350.org campaign, wanted $16.3trn. The Thrive Act proposal supported by groups associated with the Green New Deal is asking for $10trn, with 80 per cent focused on the climate."
Read 16 tweets
21 Apr
“The scientists call for the state to reduce its emissions nearly 80% by 2030, rather than the currently mandated 40%, through what they describe as a ‘a wartime-like mobilization of resources.’ Why should the Golden State double its efforts?” (1/x) latimes.com/business/story…
“The paper rattles off a dizzying series of facts about the climate consequences already confronting Californians: 4.3 million acres burned in 2020, about 4% of the state... “
“... Nearly $150 billion in health and economic damages from smaller firestorms two years earlier, and conflagrations so bad experts didn’t expect to see them for another 30 years.”
Read 5 tweets
16 Apr
Yesterday, I had the humbling privilege of testifying before the Senate Budget Committee on the cost of climate inaction. Recent net-zero commitments show the world finally understands the gains to be seized through decarbonization, I said. "Do we?" (1/x) budget.senate.gov/hearings/the-c…
Because a five-minute opening statement can only contain so much, I wanted to thread together some of the major points of my written testimony, which can be found here: budget.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/…
First, the impacts of climate change are already here and already enormous. This fact should be clear to anyone watching a television, and yet some of the present estimates are astonishing even to those of us paying close attention.
Read 75 tweets
16 Apr
“In May 2011, the government-appointed Climate Commission released its report The Critical Decade. The report’s final section warned that to keep global temperature rises to 2℃ this century, ‘the decade between now and 2020 is critical.’” (1/x) theconversation.com/failure-is-not…
“As the report noted, if greenhouse gas emissions peaked around 2011, the world’s emissions-reduction trajectory would have been easily manageable: net-zero by around 2060, and a maximum emissions reduction rate of 3.7% each year.”
“Delaying the emissions peak by only a decade would require a trebling of this task – a maximum 9% reduction each year.”
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(