All of this thread does a lot to explain why I don't think we're seeing aircraft at all. That's why the reaction is "meh".
Aircrafts that can defy the laws of physics including the ability to "cloak" or disappear from instrumentation... but that only works some of the time? They're carefully hiding their presence from us but doing stunts in our atmosphere?
I believe there are UFOs... well, maybe O is too specific. But sure, there are sightings of phenomena where we don't understand what we're looking at. But we don't understand much of what we're looking at when we look at the sky. Our brains aren't equipped to parse that stuff.
Okay, teenage rebels doing doughnuts on our lawn is a possibility.

But as I was saying: our brains aren't equipped to parse what we see when we look up.

For instance, how big is the moon? I don't mean the diameter of our satellite, I mean the apparent size of the visible disk-like shape in the sky. We are *terrible* at judging that.
If you're seeing a craft in the sky at night... well, mostly what you're seeing are the lights. It's hard to judge the size of something in the sky to begin with. It's impossible to judge the size of something by the light given off by lights attached to it.
So if you're watching something move through a three dimensional space, from a large distance, and you have no ability to parse its apparent size, you *can't tell* what angles it's turning at because you're effectively seeing it in two dimensions.
You can only clearly see the portions of the three-dimensional curve its turning radius makes through space that are vertical or horizonal with respet to your field of vision, not any part of the curve that is carrying it closer to or farther from you.
So people tell me about seeing glowing balls in the sky moving at impossible angles... I can believe they're accurately describing what they saw, but I wonder if they're describing a more gentle or natural arc, being flattened from their perspective into a two dimensional plane.
So some of it might be aircraft, in particular things like light-up quadcopter style drones that are already moving in and behaving in different ways than conventional craft are expected to.
Like, if your brain is parsing the light of a small drone relatively close to you in the sky as being a larger craft farther away? You'll think it's going much faster than it is.
And then some of it's not crafts at all, not physical objects in that sense, but just... optical phenomena. Atmospheric phenomena.
I know "swamp gas" is a bit of a meme in UFOlogy, but... there's a lot of weird stuff that happens, and a lot of it looks weird.
And, I mean. The alternative is that somebody really does have technology "1,000 years ahead of us" and they're operating here on earth.

Say that's true.

What are we supposed to do about that?

So... meh.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Alexandra Erin

Alexandra Erin Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AlexandraErin

19 May
Been a while since I used F.Lux (the Windows program that changes color temperature for time of day, for circadian purposes) and they added an "Emerald City" mode that makes everything Matrix colored.
And honestly, I love it. Sometimes when I'm trying to go into focus mode for writing or coding I'll change the UI I'm working with to be bright green on black background, because I grew up with a lot of that.
The color green is supposed to increase mental alertness anyway. Don't know how true that is or how big the effect is but green computer displays make me feel better when I'm blah anyway.
Read 7 tweets
19 May
Took a bath because I wasn't feeling well. Did not figure out that I was not feeling well because of overheating until I had sat in the warm bath for a while. This is how I know summer is upon us.
Now have wearable mini fans blasting at my face while one of my cooling scarves soaks.
...decided to put the evaporative scarf aside and try running my electric cooling scarf off my portable charger battery to see how long it lasts, as I've never traveled with it before.
Read 8 tweets
19 May
The existence of "stablecoins" (cryptocurrencies allegedly backed on a 1:1 basis by something real, like, for instance actual money) will never not be funny to me.
TetherUSD or USDCoin, "stablecoins" pegged to and allegedly backed by US dollars, are the kind of thing Dogbert would come up with as part of a crypto investment scam.

"If the volatility of cryptocurrency isn't for you but you wish to escape the tyranny of fiat money..."
It seems like the actual purpose/use case of "stablecoins" is to reap the advantages of moving money around using the fake-shadow-money intermediary of cryptocurrency without having to weather as many swings.
Read 20 tweets
19 May
The reality that Rep. Porter is describing is the end result of the "The point of a business it to make money for stakeholders." mindset.

All businesses should have a reason to exist that isn't money, like, say, providing pharmaceuticals...
...and while there's nothing wrong with them making a profit doing so, as soon as the profits become the point, the actual original point will begin to fall by the wayside.
The much-repeated observation that cryptocurrency is basically a Captain Planet villain, plugging in a Pollution Machine that does nothing but pollute and make money... that's the future of all business under late capitalism, where profit growth is the only point of a business.
Read 5 tweets
19 May
This is why I have less and less patience each year for purity-at-pride culture: a woman having a picture of her wife on her desk counts as "sexually explicit" to a culture that sees queer existence as inherently sexual.
And you might say "But isn't putting sexual content in pride just reifying that?" No, acting like we have to desexualize our existence for it to be acceptable does that.
And a lot of the puritans immediately jump to "SEX IN THE STREETS IN FRONT OF CHILDREN" as what they think -- or want to pretend -- we're talking about, but on the basis of no "SEX IN THE STREETS IN FRONT OF CHILDREN" they don't want leather, or collars, or bustiers, or chaps.
Read 4 tweets
19 May
See, this is why I think "lawful" is where the alignment system breaks down completely as a descriptor for mortal ethics. In most meaningful interpretations of the lawful alignments, "lawful" means something different to each lawful alignment.
To answer Ana's question in his own QTed tweet, I see an evil character who uses the law as a tool as just neutral evil. An evil character who uses a tome of power to control reality for selfish gain isn't Bookish Evil, but just Regular Evil.

Same thing with a law book.
If I were running a game where a predefined villain character is coming to render a legal decision, I think my conception of the character would weigh more heavily on how I played it out than "But would a LE person do this, or is that more LN or NE?"
Read 24 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(