Palestine is a Palestinian cause, an Arab cause, an Islamic cause, a Christian cause, a Jewish cause, a humanistic cause and more. All of these things are true and one doesn't take from another and we need all of them. Palestine is *much* bigger than Palestine.
There are those people who think that by demanding that Palestinian voices be centered, we are disowning the extra-Palestinian dimensions of our cause. This is an error in understanding for which I am not responsible. It's not my job to teach you basic reading comprehension.
Balance is not "or", it's "and".
*Everyone's identity is multilayered. You'll be much happier, wiser, and calmer if you acknowledge and reconcile all your identities, rather than insist on having one of them suppress all the others, as if you must be monochrome. I am a Muslim, a Palestinian, an Arab, and more.
A wise man was once asked which of his children he likes best. He said: whoever is weak, until they get stronger; whoever is away, until they return; whoever is sick, until they're healthy
Whichever of our identities is particularly threatened, we feel it more. Human nature.
Seriously, stop projecting your own identity crisis on us. We do not exist as a people and a cause in order to help you resolve your identity. We are not some abstract entity or concept, we're real people and Palestine is a real place.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Someone really needs to write something about how precolonial MENA identities were rich, complex, and multilayered and how all this "you can be only one thing" was in part a (wrong) native answer to Western ideologies of nation states + legal monism
I mean stark example is the idea now that to be a "Jew" now means not being "Arab" and being "Arab" means not being "Jew", this is a sign of our collective epistemic colonization. Also maybe have a conversation with @mhayoun or read his book. thenewpress.com/books/when-we-…
It is urgently important to realize that the so-called Abrahamic Accords signalled the final abandonment of the land-for-peace paradigm and the death of the Arab Peace Initiative. In doing so it was the end of the two-state/Oslo paradigm, and with that, of liberal Zionism
I oppose the 2SS, the Oslo paradigm, the partition paradigm, and don't believe liberal Zionism was ever coherent even before current events. But it needs to be understood that what made the flimsy 2SS/Oslo house of cards finally fall was the so-called Abrahamic Accords
Fyi I made this exact argument in an op-ed that the @nytimes asked me to write *last year* (they reached out to me, not the reverse). I wrote the op-ed, but then they didn't run it. And now here we are trying to make a 2020 point in 2021.
Either your outrage and anguish are undulled whether it's your own people or any other people who are oppressed, crushed, and subjugated, or it's nothing but ego writ large
We didn't go through hell for generations to just make scapegoats of some other people, ignore their plight, blame them for their suffering, glorify their persecutors, or conveniently leave them behind
As a Palestinian I renew my commitment to stand with the persecuted wherever they are and whoever they are, and so stand against their persecutors wherever they are and whoever they are
سؤال: هل نعتبر انفسنا من جيل التحرير أم من جيل الإنتظار؟ إن كنا نعتبر انفسنا من جيل التحرير يجب أن تكون لدينا رؤية متكاملة واستراتيجية طويلة المدى وإجابة على كل سؤال، ولا يسوغ لنا أن نجيب على أي سؤال بلغة التأجيل أو التسويف
أن نعتبر انفسنا من جيل التحرير، فهذا يعني اننا نحن ورفاقنا من سيقوم به، جيلنا هو الذي سيخطط وينفذ على جميع المحافل، إقتصادية وسياسية وإعلامية وميدانية وقانونية وتقنية وغيرها. صدقوني نهاية القضية لن تكون أن يخرج صلاح الدين من قبره ليحررنا، ولا أن يهبط ملك من السماء فيحررنا
أما إن كنا نعتبر انفسنا من جيل الإنتظار فلنا أن نمضي سنيننا نصرخ في وجه الظلم، لنا أن نكون صامدين ومقاومين وشجعان بدون أي رؤية أو خطة أو استراتيجية، لنا ذلك وهو أضعف الإيمان، لكنه لن يحرر لا ارض ولا شعب، بل وقد يعمق مشكلتنا في حال استغل عدونا الوضع لكي يطوقنا ويكبلنا أكثر
One reason why "it's different this time around" - during previous escalations of Israeli violence, the two-state paradigm wasn't yet officially dead. Palestinians were expected to "wait", since a solution is round the corner. Now*, it's just blinding pain with no end in sight.
*To us, it was always blinding pain with no end in sight, always. But while this was obvious to us, onlookers thought we were just being cynical or irrational. This time the truth was undeniable, especially after Trump & Kushner's "Deal of the Century" and "Abrahamic Accords".
For the record: the two-state solution is dead; also the two-state solution is still the official paradigm of the United States, the European Union, and pretty much the rest of the world. More in this thread:
What goes unsaid in most conversations about Gaza that it's where the poor, outcast, and wretched of the land live - its per capita GDP is $800 (Israel's is $44,000). Martin Luther King said "a riot is the language of the unheard"; in Gaza, it's not riots, it's rockets.
MLK wasn't being pro-riot, instead he was pointing to the systemic inequality that drives it. You can't miss the subtext when sunbathers in Tel Aviv must vacate their beaches because the wretched, poor, nearly starving refugees in Gaza could hurl something back at them.
Note that MLK was not justifying or legitimizing riots when he said that, he was explaining what drives people to riot. Ask yourself, what drives a Palestinian in Gaza to join Hamas? Could it perhaps have anything to do with the lived reality imposed upon them by Israel?