I think this is what makes Nolan’s Batman trilogy interesting. It’s not contemplation about happiness utilitarianism but pondering what makes a good Philosopher King.
Ra’s al ghul and the league of shadows believe in top down control and, like our irl rulers, are prepared to sacrifice others to achieve it. Their endgame might actually be an ok utopia in theory, since we know Gotham (“the republic”) is terrible 2/
Scarecrow, the seeming first villain of the trilogy, wants to control people for the sake of control and his ego. He has no delusions it’s for a greater good & it shocked to find his masters, the league of shadows, imagine 1. 3/
Heath joker represents the spirit of rebellion against all authority, legit and otherwise. He wants to assure a philosopher king never rises. My Gen thought he was an anarchist but he’s more of a misandrist. 4/
Heath joker convinces one possible philosopher king (Bruce’s preferred one) to give up the goal. Harvey as representative of legit and properly applied law+order is antithesis of joker. 5/
As the 2nd film blatantly states (bc Nolan is never subtle) Bruce sees himself as a short term stop gap before a good philosopher king can be installed to head the Republic. 6/
Bane then is something of a nietzschean. Will to power Zarathustra sort who appears to reject the concept of philosopher kings, like Nietzsche & the modern philosophers of his era. Reject attachment to other humans to go beyond good and evil 7/
This is why a French Revolution parallel happens as a result of Bane. His ideas are modern philosophy; opposed to Bruce and R’as’s classical philosophical stances. 8/
But just as modern philosophy, Americanism, & French Revolution are just a front for satanism (luciferianism, Gnosticism); Bane is just a front for Talia Al Ghul & a return of the league of shadows. Like Nietchze he’s a stooge of Satan with delusions of importance 9/
Bruce winning, in the end, shows Nolan’s belief in classical philo with a preference for Plato. His films tend to warn us that the other type of philosopher kings (the league of shadows sorts) are at war with those of the Plato bent. He wants the latter to win 10/10
The MCU is so stupid that when they make a film that SHOULD address the above issues (“Civil War”), outlining Cap’s outlook vs Tony’s, they just turn it into a dumb (and ugly) airport fight bc they’re mad the other makes too many Whedon style quips. 11/10
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Back to the future is about how the media can manufacture history through sheer force of will. Sort of like how they can meme the world into thinking there was a m4ssacre that didn’t actually happen.
Almost every time Marty travels it’s whilst driving towards media shop. Photo Hut, movie theater, abandoned drive-in screen.
You didn’t notice the movie theater he drives towards at the end of part1 is an 4dult theater in 1985. But your brain did.
“Imagine [some crap the undernourished kid in the black leather jacket at your high school used to say about Christianity before smirking knowingly then realizing everyone walked away to get some D0ritos from the snack machine]”
Fantasy fiction that doesn’t reference Christianity at least indirectly is simply s4tanic/luciferian/gnostic. Thus Christianity is relevant to it. And the author’s hide Christ from their fiction as a way of giving their readers despair.
Christ is always the elephant in the room for fantasy fiction. If you ignore him, as an author, you’re blind or you’re a irl villain.
“Inglorious Basterds” is a fantastic post-modern film by Tarantino. The subtext is about how Hollywood ritually murders n4zi’s on screen to sustain their (Holy Wood’s) psyop power and humiliate their audiences into submission to the current order. 1/
Let’s start with the Bear J3w. 2/
BJ is fittingly played by Eli Roth fitting bc main BJ scene is played 4laughs about the death of honor (his films often have the same message
He brutally kills a n4zi who refuses to give the Basterds intel. Next n4zi up gives info. Haha ain’t it funny how honor is meaningless? 3/
Toy Story was the first blockbuster produced entirely with CGI. A terrific family film which also subtlety tells us that astronauts and the space race were fake. 1/
One major plot point of the film is how young boys had lost interest in cowboys as toys of same were being replaced by toys of astronauts. This reflects USA having conquered the western frontier & set their sights on the “final frontier”. Both drives psyopped into USA citizens 2/
Buzz Lightyear is named after Buzz Aldrin. Comedy is made of the fact that Buzz believes he’s a real space ranger. This echoes how Aldrin etc were MKed into believing they went to the moon. It’s a trick & the cowboy can see through it. Because it’s absurd and stupid. 3/
The prolife movement is controlled opposition and always has been. Like the conservative movement. It exists to funnel the legitimate righteous anger we have from babies being sacrificed to moloch and funneling into modernist behaviors and theologies. 1/
When prolifers started worrying about the feels and sads of w*men who murder3d their children, we already lost. Our righteous anger was funneled into first wave feminism, thus allowing the poison of feminism confound our Christian stance. 2/
Priests and (obv) Protestant pastors etc got in on the action. Have you ever heard a sermon that called a w*man who had an abortion anything but a victim? Ofc not. Proving FEMINISM is their actual religion. 3/