I’m diving into the 3600+ comments on GhostEzra’s “Go Watch Some Nazi Propaganda” post.
A few dozen comments in, I have encountered literally no fightback. Several of these people are almost certainly real QAnon supporters; I’ve seen them discussing the drops knowledgeably.
This is notable because GHOSTCHAT *is* GhostEzra — that’s the account he uses to comment on his posts.
No, I don’t know why he uses a separate account for that. Also I don’t really care.
That the AZ “audit” is being promoted in this thread seems… very on-brand.
There's a new report making the rounds, from Georgetown's Center for Emerging Technology, on AI and disinformation.
Essentially the takeaway is that human-machine teams can generate fairly effective disinformation right now, BUT it's computationally & financially expensive...
So *for now* all we have to worry about is state adversaries using GPT-3 or something similar to spread disinfo.
Or very wealthy people who can just blow $200K on creating ONE system, or tens of millions per year to generate content equal to, say, 1% of all activity on Twitter.
Except... I think the report is wrong about it being confined to state actors for now. *Political parties* already spend a lot of money on their digital operations. Why not more for this?
Maybe they don't think the cost-benefit is there *yet*, but remember:
So @kunstderfuge1 made a graphic re: what we do and don't know based on pictures from the drops.
The gist of it is, as I mentioned elsethread, that *if* the person who took the screenshots is *also* the person who made the posts,
*then* we know what timezone the post is from.
If they're separate people -- if someone is taking that screenshot and then emailing or texting it to Q, who THEN posts -- all we know is that Q has a confederate *in that time zone.*
To me, this is a somewhat academic distinction. If you're providing content for the Q drops...
well, then you're Q, right? Q is the person *or team* that creates the drops.
And if, OTOH, Q is a single person just going through their old photos and screenshotting good ones so they'll be right at the top of the list when they go to make a phonepost on 8kun... 'kay, great.
This couldn't go into the piece, BUT: y'know how all the photos we looked at were screenshots?
In my *opinion*, Q was sitting on their couch, scrolling through old photos 'til they found one they wanted to use; screenshotting to put it @ the top of the list; and phoneposting.
So my /personal take/ is that Q was probably physically in, and posting from, the places where the screenshots were created.
However, we can't *rule out* the possibility that someone else screenshotted the photos and texted them to Q (or emailed or whatever).
Which is why the piece very carefully does not say that the place the screenshot is taken was the place the post was made from. We don't *know* that.
I am pleased to announce the first forensic evidence of Q’s whereabouts, discovered by my colleague Abigail X (@BobPythonic) with help from Robert Amour (@kunstderfuge1). The full story is up @Bellingcat; we summarize our work in this thread.
Using image metadata, we have been able to geolocate Q to a specific part of the world. Highlighted below are the only two time zones where, in our sample, two or more of Q’s images were taken.
The *vast* majority, ~68%, were from the Pacific time zone.
So… how did we do it?
Most images in Q drops don’t have enough useful metadata to analyze, but a specific subset, images which are phone screenshots, do. In the “DateCreated” field, we found a series of timestamps that reveal the time when Q took these screenshots, just before posting the drop.