my favorite unknown art history fact to drop on people is that the oldest image of Christ we have might be this piece of graffiti from rome where he has a donkey head captioned “alex worships his god” that some guys probably made to make fun of their christian friend or coworker:
its called the alexamenos graffito if anyone wants to look into it. think it was only discovered around 1900 so its not really woven into the historical record and most people dont know about it. in my mind it was in a barracks and soldiers made it but i dont think that is 100%.
they can only guess the time period (i think, going from memory here) so it could be crazy early (late 1st century) or up to the 300s (i think). kind of insane that it could be in the same century as the crucifixion, also fits several theological themes like He being mocked etc
i know its not how it works but it would be cool if this guy alex was made a saint
would enjoy that, personally. if it was the 1100s we would probably develop a folkloric tradition about the carvers and their conversion and link it to some other christian carving in another city
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
kinda seems like social spaces, organizations in general, are either male oriented, female oriented, or transitioning from one to the other (usually first to second). dont really think theres anything wrong with recognizing this obvious reality.
thinking back thru my old jobs if i looked at the bureaucracy above me it was either mostly women and the social space of the job reflected this or it was mostly guys and the social space of the job reflected that. cant think of a situation or space that was an even split, ever
theres also a pretty obvious shift in many things when a transition happens or starts to happen. in terms of internet ethnography i find this topic extremely interesting because ostensibly the main physical driver of this, potential for sex, is at least way way less present.
most people have been told that the way to gain knowledge about themselves is to indiana jones dive deep into their past to unearth “deep” artifacts so they see whatever they placed in the trauma box as the ultimate source of their self instead of something that happened to them
theres some legitimacy to this ofc but ultimately it becomes fetishistic. it also means that instead of the face being a clear window into the spirit it becomes a bricked over facade (florensky, iconostasis), this necessitates a “grand reveal” at some point in the dating process.
i suspect this also has something to do with a pathological view of the self that is in a way reminiscent of [some] mysticism. even if most normal people have never encountered this theres a slight edge of “the self” being pathological or totally constructed in their language.
“you asked her what she thought about anime nuns.”
g: i was making conversation. i wanted to know if she thought it was appropriate.
“did you think THAT was appropriate?”
g: jerry, i cant be with a woman who denigrates monastic life
elaine: i like the anime nuns. i like when they play with the ducks
g: elaine, monasticism should not be reduced to a slice of life anime
j: he has a point. whats next, anime pope? anime God?
e: id watch that, yeah
g: u have no standards
e: of course not. thats why im here.
[kramer bursts in the apartment door]
i cant TAKE it anymore. have you even asked yourself WHY this girl LIKES the anime nuns? theyre wholesome. thats what nuns are. this might be the one wholesome thing she HAS in her life
north american christian material culture archives book hunt is active
no date on this one but has a signature. insta-obtained obviously:
1901 so this one is a full 120 years old (one century.2). it has a lot of foxing, thats this weird paper staining. some people say it can spread to other books but some people say it actually doesnt (anyone know?), might obtain:
saw this last time i was here. not very old but its pretty cool:
alright obviously someone asked so while im having coffee this morning i will explain how i talk about this with normal people and how i answer these questions. the person in question was trying to reason out what aliens are and reached the point of “hmm none of this makes sense”
so, first off, how much of this first part you do with normal people depends on the situation but it helps to pad your explanation with the reality that the mundane (as in purely physical) explanations dont make sense, in my opinion. something u can drive that home.
for example, this guy says, so what, the US military has spent millions investigating itself? (presumes they’re being honest but whatever). doesnt add up. also another nation had this tech in the 70s / 80s, doesnt add up. in his view. u can go through it with them.
i will explain a dichotomy in terms of two paths for reasoning about psychedelics here that i essentially never see explicated. once you see and understand it you will understand this type of “reasoning” a lot more (i tried to explain this to mike, he never responded). [...]
i just woke up and am having coffee. presumably there will be typos. good morning. did you sleep well. apparently no one is.
anyway when DMT was becoming more popular in our culture, more people were doing it, of course naturally people wanted to discuss it and explain it, right
we are going to characterize the default “type of” explanation as the machine elf explanation. this is more of a meta look at it, + that (if youre familiar with it, if not i’ll explain) is just the perfect example. if youre unfamiliar, lets zoom in on one aspect of the experience