1 From Reid's Op Ed in NYT. Some is a little disappointing.
"It’s unclear whether the U.F.O.s we have encountered could have been built by foreign adversaries, whether our pilots’ visual perception during some encounters was somehow distorted, or whether we truly have credible
"It’s unclear whether the U.F.O.s we have encountered could have been built by foreign adversaries, whether our pilots’ visual perception during some encounters was somehow distorted, or whether we truly have credible
2 "evidence of extraterrestrial visitations. There may be other, as yet unknown explanations for some of these strange sightings."
Distorted, visual perceptions by pilots? Maybe in a few cases but @LueElizondo references cases that he says are backed by multiple sensors.
Distorted, visual perceptions by pilots? Maybe in a few cases but @LueElizondo references cases that he says are backed by multiple sensors.
3 "Of course, whatever the science tells us, some portion of the public will continue to believe in the reality of otherworldly U.F.O.s as a matter of faith. Ultimately, the U.F.O. debate can be broken down into a sincere belief in science versus
4 "a sincere belief in ETs. I side with science."
With me, faith has nothing to do w/it. Nothing in science prevents any of these objects from being ET, inter-dimensional, otherworldly or something else we don't understand, but represents another intelligence. Give us data!
With me, faith has nothing to do w/it. Nothing in science prevents any of these objects from being ET, inter-dimensional, otherworldly or something else we don't understand, but represents another intelligence. Give us data!
6 At least he included extraterrestrial visitations as a possibility. He’s usually pretty careful with what he says so that’s pretty big. Just hope he doesn’t walk it back tomorrow. I still think a big part of what we’re dealing with is from here. I’m not talking our black tech.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
