#FridayPhysicsFun – coming home after 6 months of absence implied a lot of dusting. Still almost nothing compared to the dust in Messier 64, the "Black Eye Galaxy". What and why is dust? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Eye…
“Dust” refers to fine particles of solid matter. It can be almost anything. But the smallness makes it behave different from larger pieces.
Household dust is dead skin cells, various fibres, pollen, mites, soil particles etc. The composition depends a lot on where you are and who you are: the bacterial content is about half determined by humans.
ehp.niehs.nih.gov/doi/10.1289/eh…
linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S…
You can of course make art out of the dust, like Allison Cortson's portraits: phaidon.com/agenda/art/art…
Outdoors it shows up as wind-borne dust, formed by erosion as sand-grains rub against each other in deserts or when fine soil particles are dislodged. Important factor in local & global weather & ecology (iron seeding in oceans, rainfall in Amazonia). en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saltation…
The dust I care most about is in space (as evidenced by the build-up of domestic dust at my home).
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_du…
There is fine dust in the solar system producing the Zodiacal light as it scatters sunlight. Much is only mildly scattered, making up the triangular glow around the sun. Some backscatters straight back, making up the gegenschein opposite to the sun.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zodiacal_…
A small dust particle (<1 μm) is pushed out of the solar system since the light pressure dominates over the Sun’s gravity. Bigger particles (up to 1 mm) experience Poynting–Robertson drag that slow them, making them spiral inwards. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poynting%…
It looks like the main source is comets but ejection from Mars also looks important. Comets mostly shed organic, soot-like dust but recently iron and nickel atoms has been observed too – it is yet unclear how that works. nature.com/articles/d4158…
There is a lot of interstellar dust as one can see in the dark bands of the Milky Way. If you send a light ray towards the galactic centre the probability of it hitting a dust grain is almost 1. Still, it is about 1% of the mass of the interstellar medium. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_du…
The average density is about 500 grains per cubic kilometre. A semiconductor factory clean room would be proud to be so empty! (Dark clouds would actually not comply with the standard) en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleanroom
The opaque dust is very fine: the area of grains scale as r^2 while volume and mass go as r^3, so a given amount of matter has more area the more finely it is ground. Hence, it obscures more, down to a hundred nanometre limit set by light wavelengths.
The dust around the Pleiades form a reflection nebula: most light is forward scattered because of ≈1 μm dust, and blue because of Rayleigh scattering. Iron and nickel aligns the grains with magnetic fields, producing the “combed” appearance.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pleiades#…
Dust grains can also acquire electric charges on their surface, making them spin and produce microwaves.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spinning_…
This dust tends to form in the stellar wind of carbon stars or red giants with some contribution from supernovas. The carbon and silicate grains get covered by ices in cold interstellar clouds. It also evaporates due to UV light. academic.oup.com/mnras/article/… earth-planets-space.springeropen.com/articles/10.50…
The reason I care about interstellar dust is the problem of fast interstellar travel: you do not want to run into a large grain when travelling close to the speed of light. iopscience.iop.org/article/10.384…
We do not know the density of bigger grains since astronomical observations can mainly see the finer dust. It is generally believed that such grains are rare, but how rare remains uncertain. osti.gov/biblio/1525731
The dust density sets a travel distance limit at any given speed, equal to when the volume swept by the craft is big enough to contain a dangerous particle. I think we can make narrow craft and the density isn't so bad, but we need to find out.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Anders Sandberg

Anders Sandberg Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @anderssandberg

2 Apr
#FridayPhysicsFun - the EmDrive has failed some fairly rigorous tests. So no neat reactionless space propulsion. But why were most people so confident that it really did not work even before this?
popularmechanics.com/science/a35991…
The EmDrive purports to produce thrust by reflecting microwaves inside a conical cavity, producing an uneven force on the device that would make it move - in violation of momentum conservation.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EmDrive
Momentum in Newtonian mechanics is just defined as the product of mass and velocity. The change of momentum is equal to the net force on it. In relativistic mechanics one often takes the force law as the definition.
Read 18 tweets
6 Mar
Looking at the dynamics of classic vortices it looks like they might be able to form a billiard-ball computer. Might be that vortex pairs work as signals.
There is a very neat theory for these vortices stretching back to Helmholtz. Positions can be treated as points in complex plane, and everything is very integrable. vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/bitstream/hand…
The main problem I see is that stationary structures are too easily moved by vortex pairs: discrete space is so much more forgiving for error-correction.
Read 4 tweets
5 Mar
#FridayPhysicsFun - Is water stable or potentially explosive? The answer may depend on whether one can construct a computer out of fluid.
Fluid motion is described by the Navier-Stokes equations. They are non-linear and really tricky to solve.
quantamagazine.org/what-makes-the…
One problem mathematicians would like to solve is whether an initial state of finite fluid velocities will remain finite, or whether it could evolve into something with a singularity.
Read 15 tweets
29 Jan
#FridayPhysicsFun - Last week I gave a talk about Karl Popper's critique of historicism and how this strikes at macrohistory and future studies. But what does physics say we cannot predict?
Classical mechanics has "Laplace's demon" (born in 1814): it knows all the positions and momenta of every particle in the universe, the full set of mechanical laws, and should then in principle be able to predict the future state at any point in time.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laplace%2…
Like most thought experiment demons (Descarte's, Maxwell's, Darwin's, and so on) it mostly exists to be exorcised. newyorker.com/books/under-re… springer.com/gp/book/978331… degruyter.com/princetonup/vi…
Read 21 tweets
5 Dec 20
OK, what is it that I am missing when people go on about environmental impact of ML? Strubell et al estimate of 284 tons CO2equiv for big transformer training is about what you get for 300 tons of steel: short railway bridge. Industrial countries produce megatons steel annually.
My guess: original point "your computation actually has environmental impact and cost" got transmuted - by not comparing to other *industrial* things - into "your computation is a serious environmental issue".
Energy cost of computation/comms *as a whole* does matter (Koomey's law needs to be speeded up), but the ML focus seems more be to knock something with currently high prestige compared to corporate database management or webservers.
Read 4 tweets
4 Dec 20
#FridayPhysicsFun - One of the weirdest physical effects I know about is the Casimir effect (in my mental ranking it is just a step down from the Aharanov-Bohm effect). physicsworld.com/a/the-casimir-…
If you place two uncharged conductive surfaces close together in vacuum, there is an attractive force between them. Why? Because the vacuum between them has less energy than the vacuum outside them. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casimir_e… scholarpedia.org/article/Casimi…
Empty space, according to quantum field theory, is full of possible electromagnetic waves and they all have a finite zero-point energy. However, normally the only thing that matters is differences between this energy and fields with actual waves.
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(