Leaders at Twitter jump when there is negative information regarding Coronavirus vaccine despite the fact that the CDC/FDA highlight those issues. It’s as if @TwitterSupport has more confidence in those vaccines than FDA/CDC. Why hide side effects that CDC/FDA alone say R legit?
This NYT headline and quote from a doctor are amazing: There are reports of inflammation next to the heart in dozens of young people who took the Coronavirus vaccine, but it’s not yet determined it is from the vaccine; it’s possibly just a coincidence. #myocarditis
Fauci said days ago that if 70% of the population is vaccinated, a major outbreak in the fall will be avoided.
Kids under 18 are 22% of the population; we can reach 70% with out them. They are a fraction of Coronavirus deaths and a fraction of their deaths is from Coronavirus.
The chart is from the CDC. It covers all of 2020 through 5/15/21.
Children under the age of 18 are 0.05% of all Coronavirus deaths, and Coronavirus is 0.67% of all the 44,028 children deaths.
Note that deaths are more easily attributed to Covid-19 than anything is to vaccines.
We can reach 70% vaccination without the kids; a threshold Fauci said is needed to avoid a fall breakout. With low Coronavirus deaths in children and with vaccine reactions, why bother them?
Yell anti vaxx while losing the will of millions of parents or engage like an adult.
According to two studies, Coronavirus hospitalization of children in California was overestimated by at least 40%.
On a national scale this means 210 children died with Coronavirus; not 295 which is low as is relative to 1) overall Coronavirus deaths and 2) all children deaths.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
People have often rejected the claim that election fraud ("mistakes & errors") occurred in 2020 in the 100s or in the 1000s; which is a huge sum considering that states are often very narrowly decided.
Let's look at GA.
2/ Do date, Biden officially won GA by 11,709 votes which is a 0.23% margin among the 4.93 million votes.
How narrow is a 0.23% margin?
Well, let's read what the Atlanta Journal-Constitution (AJC) wrote on Nov 19, 2020 following a statewide manual recount:
3/ "No county had an error rate higher than 0.73% compared to their original results" in a state decided by 0.23%
If a manual, rushed recount uncovered in one place an error rate larger than the state's margin of victory, what would a thorough investigation statewide find?
I told you
I told you
I told you
I told you
I told you
PANTS PISSING Cons ran for the hills about the debate due to some fake mediaaa expectations and because, well, they are pants pissers.
👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼
The main attack by Harris was that Trump is a danger, unprepared and a joke to lead the country, yet 54% in the instant CNN poll have confidence in both candidates' ability to run the US, and Trump LEADS by 4 among those who have "a lot of confidence."
Her main attack FAILED!
While the main Harris attack (Orange Man Bad) failed miserably as seen in the poll results above, Trump connected Harris to the Biden Mess so effectively that Harris begged him to stop ("you are not running against Biden") and Trump indeed GAINED a net 4 on the economy:
1/ Biden-Harris admitted into the US 5.6 mill undocumented immigrants and millions more are not in the count, yet the @HouseGOP is too scared to dare Dems to shut the government to keep this mess going.
Instead, Republicans blame themselves by saying "we are not shutting down."
2/ If Republicans can't hold the line against something to the Radical Left of Dems from a mere 10 years ago, why run/win?
Where are the supposed principles?
Even IF holding the line here (and on impeachment) "costs" Republicans, well, gotta put Country Over Party. No?
3/ Republicans made immigration a big issue in #NY03 yet lost big time in the Special in part because voters don't see @HouseGOP as the fix to this problem.
Generic Ballot sucks for the GOP now too. Is it because the GOP is too harsh on this crisis? No. It's the opposite!
Below is the first Tweet-share by @RashidaTlaib since the news that Hamas, a government whose lies she spreads on speed dial, executed an American. No other tweet or tweet share as of now; 36 hours after the news broke.
Obviously, it is the opinion of @RashidaTlaib (and/or the opinion of many of her voters) that Hamas had a 'legitimate context' to execute an American last week or else she would easily tweet against it as she does to echo lies by Hamas.
@RepRashida @RashidaTlaib I am not outraged by Tlaib's lack of outrage on the execution of an American.
I am pointing it out so that people understand the poisonously-depraved world view of her "cause."
If she, a US-born & Elected Official is this depraved, imagine the views by those on the lower rungs.
Blame Corporate/Regime Media for propping up a dead economy; for hyping bad reports as good which impacted the thinking of Fed officials that with inflation not yet settled, the economy can absorb continued high rates.
When the economy was in recession in 2022 (two net negative quarters of GDP; meaning by the end of the second quarter the economy was smaller than before the first), we were gaslit that this isn't a recession. The term was changed in real time like in 1984 propaganda fashion.
As a result of the propaganda, consumers kept spending and the economy recovered; underpinned by federal spending, not by a "real" economy. Then, part time jobs gains at the place of full time ones were sold as all in the same; feeding the hype of a "good" economy.