Really excellent, insightful article highlighting crucial role of culture in understanding variation in heritability 👇 But I have a quibble... (thread below)
The article frames phenotypic variance as capable of being partitioned into a component explained by genetic variance and a component explained by environmental variance. 2/n
And it looks in detail at how environmental variance and gene-environment interactions (and therefore heritability) are all sensitive to cultural differences, clustering, sampling effects, etc. 3/n
This is all great and provides welcome and essential nuance to often simplistic interpretations of results from behavioural genetics 4/n
But in framing all non-genetic variance as "environmental" in origin it ignores a third component of variance, which is developmental 5/n
Many of our psychological traits reflect differences in brain development. A lot of this variation may be genetic in origin, but much of it is due to inherent stochastic developmental variation. 6/n
The brains (and minds) of MZ twins are already different from each other at birth, prior to any experience or environmental effects. 7/n
Rather than thinking about genetic versus environmental sources of variance, we should think about innate versus experiential... 8/n
It then becomes interesting to ask the extent to which different cultures allow such individual innate predispositions to be expressed or even amplified... 9/n
This ties back in to all the important themes of the article, but recognises that not all innate differences are genetic in origin and not all non-genetic effects are environmental. 10/n
And finally, while I'm here, you can read more about this in my book INNATE 😊 press.princeton.edu/books/paperbac…
Actually, things get even more complicated, in ways that mirror the meta-interaction theme of the target article...
Developmental variability is itself a genetic trait. Increasing load of genetic variation decreases developmental robustness, as discussed in this short talk: via @YouTube
AND, this varying ability of the developing organism to channel development into an optimal range is affected by environmental variation!
IQ - one of the main traits of interest of the target article - may actually be partly an index of this kind of developmental robustness wiringthebrain.com/2012/07/geneti…
At the end of the day, main effects of different sources of variance are a (sometimes useful) statistical abstraction. In reality, it's interactions all the way down.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Kevin Mitchell

Kevin Mitchell Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @WiringTheBrain

21 Mar
I think @Lise_Eliot and colleagues have done a real service to the field in performing this exhaustive meta-analysis of the messy literature on sex differences assessed by neuroimaging cc @bogglerapture @StuartJRitchie
Longish thread: *Assessed by neuroimaging* is important here, as it’s an extremely gross level at which to look for differences, compared to what can be done in other animals (where lots of fine differences are observed).
So there could, in the first instance, be NO sex differences observed by neuroimaging and that would not have any bearing on whether differences exist in microarchitecture, distribution of cell types, synaptic connectivity, gene expression profiles, cellular physiology, etc.
Read 20 tweets
23 Aug 20
Towards Reproducible Brain-Wide Association Studies biorxiv.org/content/10.110… (thread follows...👇)
This is a really interesting and important paper showing that very large samples are required to get reliable associations between brain imaging and behavioral phenotypes
The starkest conclusion is that the vast sea of literature to date claiming such associations is completely polluted by false positives (not a surprise given they never replicate)
Read 15 tweets
29 May 20
This paper by Paul Cisek is essential reading for cog neuro folks: Resynthesizing Behavior Through Phylogenetic Refinement pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31161495/ - really about reframing and anchoring cognitive concepts in simpler, more ancient mechanisms
This paper really lays out a fundamental paradigm shift for cognitive science that is much more grounded in biology, IMO... It's incredibly well thought out and presented - great pics too!
My marginalia are pretty much just emphatic "yes!"es 👍
Read 4 tweets
23 May 20
Rethinking anorexia: Biology may be more important than culture, new studies reveal sciencemag.org/news/2020/04/r…
Very interesting piece. Like all psychiatric disorders, anorexia is quite heritable, so vulnerability has some biological basis. But how it is expressed may depend on cultural context and experience
But is it an issue with body image and social competition or is it a compulsion around appetite and starvation (as framed in the piece)?
Read 6 tweets
1 Mar 20
Machine-Learning Maestro Michael Jordan on the Delusions of Big Data and Other Huge Engineering Efforts - IEEE Spectrum spectrum.ieee.org/artificial-int…
A very interesting read, with a healthy dose of anti-hype skepticism, particularly about the dangers of torturing data until it confesses to something...
This is just the multiple testing problem, magnified by the huge dimensionality of modern datasets. (And the hubris in thinking you can correct for it)
Read 7 tweets
21 Feb 20
Area-specific synapse structure in branched posterior nucleus axons reveals a new level of complexity in thalamocortical networks jneurosci.org/content/early/… - really nice, detailed work
...but I don't quite understand the claim of a "new subcellular level of complexity". There are many known examples a neuron making different types of synapses onto different target cells
Synaptic properties depends on both partners: Specification of synaptic connectivity by cell surface interactions nature.com/articles/nrn.2…
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(