It's always interesting to consider that Madoff employed close to a hundred people. Many of whom absolutely either in on it or basically a turned a blind eye to what they saw.
Just normal people waking up every day, having their coffee, and going to work for a Ponzi scheme. Just like software engineers go to work for cryptocurrency companies.
The nature of the scam has change. The whole crypto investment fraud scheme is a different flavour of financial fraud but it's not significantly different. Promises of insane returns and no questions asked about where they come from.
There's going to be a reckoning in the software ethics after this whole crypto investment scheme implodes and the truth is laid bare about the crypto cartels manipulating prices this whole time.
The biggest lie in finance is that "this time it's different".
And instead of accountants cooking the books, now we have software developers doing exactly the same thing but in code.
History doesn't repeat itself, but it rhymes. And this is all going to end very badly.
A word to wise engineers: Don't find yourself on the wrong side of history in enabling an enormous global financial fraud. It's hard to live with that personally and professionally it's even worse.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Let's talk about why cryptocurrency is the single factor that created the ransomware plague that is ravaging our healthcare system and public infrastructure. (1/) 🧵
Malware is not a new phenomenon, it has existed since the 90s and has seen massive proliferation ever since the rise of widespread internet connectivity and home computing. (2/)
What is a new phenomenon is 'ransomware' which is a form of malware which infects a target's computer, encrypting or threatening to delete their files in exchange for a ransom to be paid to the hackers. (3/)
Let's talk about how cryptocurrencies are for all intents and purposes multilevel marketing schemes for tech dudes. 🧵 (1/)
Normal MLM businesses are a type of legal pyramid scheme in which non-salaried workers purchase products (cosmetics, health food, vitamins) out of pocket from a company at a discount to do direct sales to friends and family. They make a small commission on these sales. (2/)
The second revenue stream is by fractional commissions from any other people that one has recruited into the same scheme, called one's "downline distributors". The person who recruits people into the scheme gets a percentage of their sales. (3/)
Let's talk about the Tether scandal, why recent disclosures about it are such a big deal, and why it represents a form of systemic risk for the already shady crypto market. (1/) 🧵
Stablecoins are virtual currencies that are always supposed to have the same real-dollar value. People that day trade cryptocurrencies often want shift their unstable tokens to safe real currencies (like the dollar) because wild market fluctuations make it unsafe to hold. (2/)
However when a company transacts in dollars they have to follow the rules of the bank that holds them and by proxy the rules US govt imposes on the bank. If you're trading crypto, then you probably don't like those rules since you're probably doing something shady. (3/)
People often ask me if there's anything related to blockchain that isn't tied to grift. Possibly, but the only way you can tell is by examining the business model. (1/) 🧵
Anything that self-identifies itself as a cryptocurrency is clearly a scam (see my vast number of other threads for the reasons), so let's get that out of the way first. (2/)
I wouldn't go so far as to say that everything that self-identifies as a blockchain project is a scam. For instance Microsoft had a Azure Blockchain Service that recently got shut down. (3/) zdnet.com/article/micros…
The crypto industry is following exactly the same playbook as the tobacco industry when it comes spreading disinformation and spin about bitcoin not being the ecological disaster we all know it is.
In the 1970s the tobacco lobby revealed the mechanism they spin public opinion. You don't try to refute facts directly, you just spread doubt.
> "Doubt is our product since it is the best means of competing with the 'body of fact' that exists in the mind of the general public."
Bitcoiners want you to believe the truly nonsensical position that because the carbon footprint of mining is not absolutely precisely knowable, we shouldn't even ask questions about the per-transaction cost.
They don't want you to ask about bitcoin's inconvenient truth.
Let's talk about Elon's "hustle" with Tesla's bitcoin holdings and why it's horrible for markets and the public at large. (1/) 🧵
Disclosure: It won't come as a shock to anyone I'm not a fan of Muskrat cult of personality that emerged around him. However a person is not reducible down to a single facet, we're all the sum of our good and bad choices.
While there is some good, let's talk about the bad. (2/)
The facts:
In January 2021, Tesla the company decided to use company funds to silently purchase bitcoin at $34,200 facilitated by the then private company Coinbase. The company spent $1.5bn to secretly purchase 48,000 coins. (3/)