As @fascinatorfun pointed out, the FT figures mixed data from both Pfizer and AstraZeneca jabs.
The study breaks it down by vaccine and, on the face of it, isn't good news for AstraZeneca (ChAdOx1).
But they do say this may be partly due to 2nd jabs starting later for AZ.
Data for both vaccines on preventing symptomatic cases is similar 21+ days after the first dose -
Pfizer:
49% protection vs B.1.1.7
33% protection vs B.1.617.2
AstraZeneca:
51% protection vs B.1.1.7
33% protection vs B.1.617.2
So about a third less effective against B.1.617.2
Data for 14+ days after the second dose is more varied -
Pfizer:
93% protection vs B.1.1.7
88% protection vs B.1.617.2
AstraZeneca:
66% protection vs B.1.1.7
60% protection vs B.1.617.2
Only a small drop in effectiveness against B.1.617.2, but big difference between vaccines.
However, it may take more than 2 weeks after the second dose for the AstraZeneca vaccine to reach peak effectiveness.
Because its roll out started 4 weeks later, more people in the study had only got their second AZ jab in the last few weeks.
So numbers *may* improve with time.
The concern is:
- 30% of adults (and almost all children) haven't been vaccinated at all
- 30% have had one dose, which only gives 33% protection against B.1.617.2
- 40% have had two doses, but 10% were in the last 2 weeks
So lots of people still vulnerable to infection.
The good news is both vaccines are more effective at preventing serious illness and death than they are at stopping you from catching the virus at all or developing (mild) symptoms, even after only one dose.
There's no data on this for B.1.617.2 yet.
So it looks like:
- Both vaccines are less effective against B.1.617.2 after one dose
- The difference is far smaller after two doses
- Most people haven't had two doses yet though
- But even one dose should give fairly good protection against death or hospitalisation
The government press release (which today's newspaper headlines were based on) is here: gov.uk/government/new…
Update on the situation in Bolton, courtesy of the covid dashboard.
First up, cases are still rising rapidly. Daily case numbers are almost back to the peak they reached during the second wave that hit the North West hard in the autumn.
It says a lot that so many politicians and their friends saw the pandemic as a get rich quick scheme.
In this case a disgraced former MP working with an organic dog food company owner (!) to broker a deal with a Hong Kong company, which itself seems to be a middleman. 🙄
Meanwhile in Canterbury, disgraced former scientist Michael Yeadon (who thinks proposed covid booster shots may be a plot to depopulate the Earth) is addressing people in a park with a PA system.
Having recently complained that he wasn't able to do this.
The problem is he's a racist crank with no expertise in viruses and a long history of writing nonsense.
His recent output on ResearchGate (which he was repeatedly warned about before the ban) includes articles claiming "vaccines are inherently dangerous" and that the surge in deaths last spring wasn't caused by covid but was "mass homicide by government response".
Before covid he was also a climate change denier.
A 2007 article claimed global warming was a "useful myth" that "deflects attention away from real world issues" such as "power-driven financiers, corporations and their cartels backed by military might".