Why
Honestly wanted to tweet something witty and sat there for about five minutes and all I could come up w/ was "why?"
Here's the thing. I am not opposed to interviewing Trump voters about their feelings about racial justice or the specific case of George Floyd. I'm in favor of gathering sociological information just for the historical record. But that's not what the Times' did here.
What the Times did was to just air Trump voters' feelings w/o any analysis and to then describe this platforming as commentary on the ***legacy*** of George Floyd. None of these comments reveal anything about Mr. Floyd's legacy or his death. They reveal things about Trump voters.
This isn't about George Floyd. It's about the people being interviewed. And, in the absence of any analysis, it's not even sociologically interesting or informative. How many people would read an article called "14 White Liberal Women's Thoughts on the Legacy of George Floyd."
No one would want to read that. Because what do 14 random white liberal women have to say about the legacy of George Floyd? It wouldn't be about *him*. It would be about *them*.
But, when it comes to Trump voters, they get a special platform to talk about what a man's murder means to them. A platform w/out fact-checking or any kind of sociological analysis. Just a blank canvas for their own sociopolitical psychologies that exist separately from Mr. Floyd
So, I repeat: WHY
And I will repeat: I think there is historical/sociological/psychological worth in documenting the thoughts of any group. But documenting & analyzing is different than just broadcasting "14 Neo-Nazis on the Legacy of the Holocaust."

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mangy Jay

Mangy Jay Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @magi_jay

23 May
My work as a member of Hillary Clinton's Street Team was frankly some of my finest
For the record, I loved Bernie, but never hated Hillary. I wanted a Dem to win the general. I grew disenchanted w/ Bernie over numerous things, including his tactics, class-exclusionary statements, late-primary behavior, & rhetoric that I felt fed the vitriol of some supporters
And, yes, the only thing more embarrassing than that scarf is that I literally chose to wrap it around my head. You're allowed to laugh.
Read 4 tweets
21 May
Antisemitic attacks have surged in the past weeks. There have been reports of hate crimes in the U.S., Argentina, & Canada, as well as across Europe. No one should be silent about this violence. Opposing actions from the Israeli state does not entail acceptance of antisemitism
I sense a lack of outrage over these incidents. We shouldn't make our condemnation of bigotry contingent. And I think it says a lot about our own biases that so many seem to think recognition of antisemitism and Jewish victims somehow entails support of Netanyahu's actions.
If that's the default in your brain, it is an antisemitic one & you should fight it.
Read 4 tweets
19 May
There are so many people who will be harmed by the new abortion restrictions, especially people of low socioeconomic status. Today I am also thinking of the people who want to be pregnant but find out their fetus has severe genetic abnormalities that may be incompatible w/ life.
In the case of such abnormalities, those who carry to term are not wrong to do so, nor are those who choose to terminate. Many base their decisions on survival rates. There are some abnormalities that result in very short, extremely painful lives for infants.
I can understand why some may be anti-abortion for religious reasons, tho I think it is immoral for them to impose those restrictions on others. There is something especially hypocritical about forcing people to give birth to infants who then only experience pain before death
Read 4 tweets
18 May
Here's my new piece for @johnastoehr. Over the past year, the GOP has both denied the results of a democratic election and waged a war on public health. The success of these deceits would not have been possible if not for a decades-long assault on our shared reality.
"The Big Lie" has only succeeded because minds were primed for it. The GOP lied about Medicare. They lied about Civil rights. They lied about climate. They lied about WMDs. They lied about the ACA.

They even lied about President Obama's citizenship. stoehr.substack.com/p/47871a77-863…
The "Big Lie" about the election is not, in fact, separate from all of the lies about COVID. 2020 was a year in which the GOP succeeded in both undermining the results of an election *and* convincing many Americans to disregard hundreds of thousands of their fellow citizens dying
Read 6 tweets
18 May
The "scrappy fringes," you say
Yes, yes, I know, Marine Le Pen is not her father. She's just as islamophobic, better at hiding her anti-semitism (though still not great), BUT she never tortured men in Algeria w/ electrical cables, so there's that
In any case, Marine's project of "softening" the image of her father's party has in fact been a decades-long pursuit and the revelation that she's a Cat Lady is just the most recent iteration. But then there's also stuff like this:
Read 4 tweets
16 May
One can say that the Israel gov't has enacted apartheid w/out stipulating that the state of Israel should be destroyed. There are many oppressive states in the world & the focus should be on reforming them, not destroying them & leaving citizens stateless, the pathway of genocide
Unfortunately, rampant anti-semitism has made it much more difficult to criticize Israel, such that, if one says they have engaged in apartheid, the inference is that the state should be destroyed, given that is what so many on the left argue. We need to decouple these things.
India is a oppressive state. So is Pakistan. And Chechnya. Yet we never let criticism of these states coincide with conversations about their destruction. We would never argue that the oppressive acts of factions w/in the states should leave all the citizens stateless.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(