On this week’s episode of Judicial History, I give you intrigue, I give you animosity btw judges, I give you a cameo by Alexander Burr, I give you romance . . . er, sorry, there’s no romance. But who needs romance when we have . . .⭐️The Origin Story of Visiting Judges⭐️

(⚖️🧵)
Let’s begin by setting the scene . . . 🎭

Each year most COAs are “visited” by other judges—district judges, other circuit judges, and judges from the Court of International Trade. These judges “sit by designation” and last year helped to decide over 3,000 cases. (!) 🤯 (2/x)
How did this fascinating practice begin? How is it that a judge who is nominated & confirmed for one particular seat can sit on another court and decide a case for that court? (E.g., how does Judge Rakoff, a judge from SDNY, decide cases for the 9th Circuit?)

- HOW? -

(3/x)
Well, like many fabulous things in life – from air conditioning to the potato chip, from the tuxedo 🤵‍♀️ to the kodak camera 📸 – the origins of courts having visitors can be traced back to the great state of New York. (Big 🍎)

(We get *all* the fun facts today.)

(4/x)
History reveals that the judge for the Southern District of NY was authorized to hold court for the judge of the Northern District when those districts were first created in 1814 -apparently due to the ill health of Judge Tallmadge of the Northern District – this guy right here:
By way of background, Judges Tallmadge and William P. Van Ness (known as Aaron Burr's "second" in his duel w/ Alexander Hamilton ⭐️) had served together as the 2 judges for the District of New York since New York obtained a 2nd judgeship in 1812. Van Ness is this guy right here:
But Tallmadge wasn’t having it! 🙅‍♂️ According to H. Paul Burak (in his divine history of the SDNY) there was “animosity between the two judges" which "soon led Tallmadge to seek the separation of the State into two districts so that he might serve in one, unfettered by Van Ness" !
Tallmadge got his wish or *so it would seem.*

Congress split the District in "An Act for the better organization of the courts of the United States within the State of New York," with Tallmadge assigned to the Northern half and Van Ness to the Southern half.

BUT . . . (8/x)
The same Act made it the duty of Judge Van Ness to hold district court "in the said northern district, in case of the inability, on account of sickness or absence, of the said Matthias B. Tallmadge to hold the same." 🤦‍♀️

(Poor Judge Tallmadge must have felt so foiled!) (9/x)
Once Van Ness was authorized to assist Tallmadge, well Van Ness conducted the majority of the work in the Northern district as well as all the work in his own.

Now in addition to being disappointing for old Tallmadge, this was a ⭐️BIG MOMENT⭐️ for judicial administration.
As Judge Charles M. Hough remarked, while this arrangement began as "a concession to Tallmadge's physical weakness" - ouch 🙍 - "it marks the beginning of the system of using Judges out of their own Districts in order to relieve [the] press of business." 🎆 (11/x)
Now as a brief post script, because there was no statute authorizing the use of visiting judges, Congress repeatedly passed temporary laws to maintain this arrangement between the Northern and Southern Districts (and between Tallmadge and Van Ness). 👨‍⚖️👨‍⚖️ (12/x)
In 1818, Rep. John Forsyth of Georgia asked why the House was being called upon to legislate "so frequently" for the courts of the District of New York, and indeed why it had to be "an exception to the general judiciary system of the United States." (🍑 didn't like 🍎)

(13/x)
When told this exception was due to Judge Tallmadge's ill health, Forsyth said pointedly that "[w]hilst his health did not allow him to attend his official duties, it allowed him to travel from New York to Charleston and back every year."

#ArticleIIIShade 🏖️
Now you know how one of the most *fascinating* aspects of our federal judiciary got up and running – out of necessity 😒, out of animosity 😠, and out of ill health (or perhaps, not so much) 🤔.

(Fin)

papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Marin K Levy

Marin K Levy Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @marinklevy

15 Apr
Who is in the mood for a little judicial administration history? Everyone? Just as I suspected.

In light of the new bill to expand SCOTUS, a *big* thread on the relationship between the # of Supreme Court seats and the # of circuits. (⚖️🧵) (1/x)
Once upon a time, in 1789, Congress said "let there be courts." And so it came to be that we had 6 Supreme Court Justices and 3 Circuits – the Eastern, Middle, and Southern. (And then Congress rested. 💤) (2/x)
Now you might be thinking to yourself, 6 does not equal 3. 🙅‍♀️ To you I say, patience, my pet.

As you know, back in the bad old days of the federal courts, the Justices had to ride Circuit – and so 2 justices were assigned to each Circuit. But that math soon changed.... (3/x)
Read 16 tweets
11 Apr
@TheAtlantic has a new article, suggesting we should worry about the courts of appeals in 20 years b/c many Trump appointees will be Chief Judges and might manipulate panel assignments (creating more 2R/1D panels). This piece is *deeply problematic* and misreads my scholarship.🧵
The article begins by noting that in 2040 / 2041, many of the Chief Judges of the courts of appeals will be judges who were appointed by President Trump. That is an observation I and others have made. And that is important in some respects. (2/x)
As I talk about in my forthcoming article, "The Office of the Circuit Chief Judge," the Chief Judge has a number of important responsibilities. And that includes approving the calendar. This does not mean we should expect a whole swath of judges to manipulate that calendar. (3/x)
Read 7 tweets
10 Apr
A few quick thoughts on this rainy Friday night about the Biden Supreme Court Commission . . . (and because the little ones are in the bath and my time is short, this will be *real quick*). (Mini ⚖️Commission 🧵, 1/8-ish)
I've said before that I think the idea of a Commission is a great one. I appreciate that there are those who want action now, but I think there is great sense in bringing together thoughtful and knowledgeable people to exchange ideas, come to their own conclusions & report out. 2
(And on this point – I would very gently ask the critics who are suggesting that this group was formed “in order to do X” or “not to do X” to take a (comfortable) seat. This is an independent group of scholars and practitioners and former judges. Kindly let them do their job.)
Read 8 tweets
2 Mar
Who wants to talk about the history of law clerking? Everybody? Good. Let’s pull up a chair for a little judicial administration history….⚖️🧵 (1/x)
According to the late (Second Circuit (❤️) Judge) J. Daniel Mahoney, the "institution of clerking" (don’t you love that phrase?) began over a century ago. It is largely undisputed that the first jurist to utilize legal assistants was one Horace Gray. (2/x)
Who was Horace Gray and why did he feel the need to employ a law clerk? Well, in 1873 he became the Chief Justice of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court of Errors (which could be the subject of its own twitter thread…) and found that his workload had increased considerably.
Read 13 tweets
30 Nov 20
Following up on an insight from the great @joshchafetz (naturally), a quick thread on what I see as one of the blind spots of the legal academy, concerning methodologies… (🧵1/9)
I’ve always started from the position that the primary goal of the legal academy – as with the rest of the academy – is the production of knowledge. If that’s so, then it would seem we should value a number of different methodologies and approaches… (2/9)
It is important that we acquire more information about how the world works from empiricists – both quantitative and qualitative. It’s important to know how the world once worked from legal historians. (3/9)
Read 10 tweets
20 Nov 20
With the Court announcing new circuit allotments today, I know what you're thinking - huh, what is the story behind these allotments? Well have I got you covered! Here’s a little judicial administration history thread (with much of the underlying info c/o @FedJudicialHist).⚖️🧵1/
Let's cast our minds back to 1789...remember that the Justices initially had responsibilities on the circuit courts. Specifically, the First Judiciary Act created 3 geographical circuits (Eastern, Middle & Southern) to which the Justices were assigned for circuit riding. 2/
A few years later (in the Act of April 13, 1791) Congress mandated that the Court issue a written order at each session, indicating the circuits to which the Justices would be assigned. Seems totally fine, right? Well... 3/
Read 16 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(