At around 1 p.m. @BishopStAlbans will be asking what steps the government has taken to identify the number of leaseholders at risk of bankruptcy.
2/10 We can expect that the answer is "none" and to hear a a repeat of the same platitudes regarding £5.1 billion of funding and its £50/month #forcedloans scheme.
The question keeps the issue high on the political agenda and is likely to be a further embarrassment for the gov't
3/10 At around 2.40 this afternoon the Leasehold Reform (Ground Rent) Bill will have its Second Reading.
This will last about 3 hours. The purpose of the debate is to discuss the general principles of the bill.
4/10 The bill is welcome and vitally important because it cuts off the head of the snake that is the freehold investment industry, at least in the future.
Watch for grumblings from the landlord lobby about how removing ground rents will reduce quality of management in the future
5/10 There is no substance to this argument that without professional freeholders buildings will be managed incompetently by the people living in them.
All the current industry does is take leaseholders' money with both hands
6/10 The cladding issue shows that if professional freeholders and their managing agents cannot take money for major works from leaseholders, they have nothing to offer toward solving long-term problems such as #EndOurCladdingScandal
7/10 And in jurisdictions where there have been cladding problems, such as Australia, strata owners (the leaseholder equivalents) have managed to organise themselves perfectly well and to ring concessions from their governments without managing agents' help.
8/10 The plain fact of the matter is the rest of the world manages perfectly well without any external freeholders.
Recent work from the Law Commission, together with the new Commonhold Council, is aiming to improve the legal structure so that is possible here.
9/10 The question (at around 1 p.m.) and debate (at around 2.40 p.m.) will be shown on Parliament Live here: parliamentlive.tv/Event/Index/c0…
If the gov't had been defeated today then it may have been expected to resign, see here for details: bit.ly/3tZbBBl
3/13 Main encouraging sign from today's debate is that more Conservative backbench MPs started to speak out on the issue, including that it's #notjustcladding
This mirrored Lords last week, showing there is increasing concern inside the gov't over its handling of the issue
1/6 Using MHCLG’s own estimates there are 8,000 >18 m buildings with cladding requiring an EWS1. Multiply that by the £2.2 million average full BSF funding per building awarded to date (£241.5m/106) gives an estimated cost of £18.23 billion. #EndOurCladdingScandal
2/6 While you’re thinking about that MHCLG, on Tuesday you estimated the Building Safety Bill will apply to 13,000 >18 metre buildings. Multiplying that by £2.27m per block gives £29.5 billion, or nearly 6 times what’s currently on offer.
3/6 Your estimate of buildings 11-18 metres with cladding requiring an EWS1 is 50,000. Assuming each costs 1/2 of a >18m building that’s £56.75 billion just on them. You may not have focussed on that because your planned #forcedloans dump that cost + interest on l-holders.
2/6 Shocking answers from @teamgreenhalgh. He repeated the gov'ts incorrect assertion that works not covered by the BSF are "voluntary".
This is incorrect. The non-BSF works are often necessary to meet the standards of the Advice Notes but the gov't has chosen not to pay.
3/6 Unsurprisingly @teamgreehalgh blamed Ballymore for what happened to @npwlra with the fire on Friday, noting that the gov't has only offered £8 million to £12 million of works.
No mention of the fact that it took until last year for the gov't to put up any material funding.
As promised, the government has announced a bill to ban new ground rents. Commitments were made during the #FireSafetyBill debates last month to also look at forfeiture.
2/8 Implementing the rest of the Law Commission's recent reports on #leaseholdreform is expected to wait until later.
The balance of the package outlined important reforms on cheaper lease extension, easier Right To Manage and improving commonhold.
We need all these reforms.
3/8 As expected, the government also promises that the #BuildingSafetyBill is to be introduced this session.
We wait to see if the deeply unpopular Building Safety Charge is still included and how "high risk buildings" will actually be defined in the new law.
1/5 A win for leaseholders in the Court of Appeal. The Court held that the landlord paying for a leaseholder expert to consider whether major works can be done more cheaply is a permissible condition of granting dispensation from consultation.
2/5 Where works cost more than £250 per leaseholder or involve certain types of contracts the landlord is obliged to consult leaseholders. However this process can be bypassed by landlord application to the First-Tier Tribunal.
3/5 It has become custom since a 2013 Supreme Court decision that dispensation from consultation is granted on the condition that the landlord pays its own application costs. Here the leaseholders persuaded the Tribunal to add the extra condition of also paying for their expert.
2/15 First and foremost, this is a failure of government. It has had nearly 4 years to identify and remedy buildings at risk.
It has failed to do so, instead preferring to push the problem onto anyone except itself and then standing idly by whilst others did the same.
3/15 Freeholders do not do the right thing. The freehold to this building is still owned by the developer, Ballymore.
Ballymore has not offered any meaningful contribution to the vast costs of removing cladding, instead dumping the costs on the taxpayer and its leaseholders