One of the very best perspective pieces I’ve read on Facebook being left for roadkill as Apple raises the bar to better align privacy protections with consumer expectations. From over the weekend.
Area professor whose research is only and enthusiastically cited by adtech lobbyists and beneficiaries of tracking industry whines about New York Times columnist referencing the work of one of the most widely-respected behavioral economists in the world.
Area advertising tracking exec jumps in with a similar defense. They swim in the same circles. Encourage @keachhagey@daiwaka to call his bluff and contact the professor being falsely criticized here.
Here is the thread (the research is in the last tweet) that has the tracking lobby all stirred up on a Monday. @daiwaka@keachhagey
Happy GDPR Day. The anniversary of the strong data protection law which the two largest trackers and profiteers of surveillance economics, Google and Facebook, have continued to run over. Here is what we said to UK regulator about their efforts. assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5d7627da…
It’s worth understanding Google harvests your data off nearly every site and set rules requiring publishers to get consent for Google’s tracking thereby preserving the awful banners asking you to accept cookies. A joy for users. 🤦🏻♂️reuters.com/news/technolog…
IOW, if Google wasn’t a monopoly built on surveillance economics capturing nearly $200B in ad revenue annually, then they would work to design a web which helped fund the content you love, aligns with your privacy expectations and regulators and didn’t have awful cookie banners.
Had moment to catch Sway podcast w/ Snap CEO, Evan Spiegel, over wknd. Found it super good, highly recommend. His points at 15-20:00 in how Snap approached Spotlight, Discover by restricting inbound content for them are super refreshing in my mind. /1 nytimes.com/2021/05/20/opi…
this a nuance I expect will play a part in where policies go. eg video, whether a Peacock or Netflix, both control the acquired content available on the services. If there is no garbage content fed into platforms' powerful profit algorithms then is no garbage going out either. /2
the problems arise when a platform uses algorithmic amplification to provide acceleration, velocity and reach to content from one person to many *and* allows any content into the platform. closed platforms (content or audience networks) don't have the same risks. /3
Deeply concerning. To be clear, the report is that the Ryan Air flight headed from Greece to Lithuania was forced to land in Belarus by the government - in order to arrest a journalist who exposed and opposed them - under false pretense of a bomb threat.
I find it funny that the direct response and tracking complex can’t understand why a brand like Apple runs privacy image ads. Can’t fathom a brand creating desire and demand around attributes of a fundamental human right they’ve embraced while Facebook and Google have abused.
Watch trust in the Apple brand go up further at a fine of great vulnerability. This isn’t about winning or losing on being able to roll out a feature or even driving phone sales. It’s brand reinforcing for products that sell at prices considerably above their competition.
And in winning there, it also gives Apple a clear differentiator as more and more devices are connected to our lives. Heck it could be more about selling Apple cars in the coming years than anything the tracking complex keeps focusing on.
Outstanding news from yesterday. Google failed to move the critically important advertising antitrust case out of Texas. This is the one where they botched a filing and we learned more about allegations of collusion with Facebook. Grateful East coast witnesses can go to Texas.
It also speeds it up so the trial can start next year rather than 2023. There are real-time market harms happening including Google’s attempt to design the market mechanics for the future. This coincides with major UK announcement Tuesday (note Texas case and UK are aligned).
Here is something from last night on UK announcement for those interested. I’ll also paste my notes on the Texas lawsuit. Counter to Axios bit this morning, FB/G reckoning is moving along. ps @scottros you left off FB sued by nearly all states plus massive EU loss this week.
ok, finally read the full announcement from UK yesterday. It's a BFD. Another major nation integrating thinking on competition and data policy. This adds to the German Cartel Office decision vs Facebook, state AGs and federal antitrust suits, US Congress and other parliaments. /1
"self-reinforcing" and "insurmountable without regulatory intervention"... /2
"We do not agree" that competition law and data protection are in opposition. /3