It's like Tom Tuttle from Tacoma in "Volunteers." We sent over a tough-guy wrestler action star, and in two seconds flat we get back a sniveling toady regurgitating Communist propaganda.
Anybody still think globalist economic and cultural engagement will liberalize China?
You know what will put a stop to this disgusting cowardice from Hollywood? Make it cost more for them to suck up to China than it would cost to speak up for freedom and justice. Kill this Fast and Furious movie dead at the box office and scare the ever-loving hell out of studios.
Nothing ELSE will do it, that's for sure, China has proven that its "sharp power" policies - weaponizing its entire economy to serve the geopolitical interests of the Communist Party, using its financial leverage to compel obedience from "free" world corporations - WORKS.
Read Chinese media and you'll see the CCP is smugly confident that its political control of private industry - that would be fascism, for those of you unclear on what that term really means - is the key to dominating information space for the rest of history.
They think chaotic, messy, fractious free societies are no match for Chinese fascism's disciplined fusion of political structure, military power, cultural hegemony, and economic leverage. Free societies have too many fault lines they can exploit, while they have none.
Here's your chance to prove them wrong, movie fans. Kill Fast and Furious, and everything else John Cena does, and let Hollywood know that the cost of servile obedience to the Chinese Communist Party is the loss of American box office. There's nothing else you CAN do.
The CCP is confident that U.S. studios, their finances ruined by China's pandemic, will never do anything to risk their revenue from the surging Chinese box office. They are blasting signals that China doesn't really NEED Hollywood product any more, so offend them at your peril.
Let's force Hollywood to make that choice, shall we? The entertainment industry has FAR too much influence over American politics and culture to let it become a captive instrument of Chinese fascism. Better to burn it down and rebuild from scratch than let it become that.
If Hollywood studios decide to abandon the U.S. market - snarling every step of the way about stupid deplorable nationalist xenophobic American audiences - it's no great loss. We can rebuild. We really SHOULD, to cleanse Hollywood of its corruption and ideological rot.
We have plenty of plucky and capable independent filmmakers and storytellers ready to go. The Internet gives them ways to reach audiences. Maybe they can build a new Hollywood that can actually get people interested in its awards and "prestige projects" again.
Meanwhile, let the corrupt, bloated, narcissistic, hypocritical entertainment industry go and make its money in China. At least it will be clear up front that every movie with big Hollywood stars that China sells back to us is CCP product. A little honesty is better than none.
Can you imagine a toady like Cena or LeBron offering a groveling apology to Americans for offending their values? Of course not. They're not AFRAID OF YOU. Make them afraid, or settle for being the audience they care about less, the audience they'll never respect. /end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Why does Marxist thought inspire so much violence? It goes back to that core oppression narrative, the notion that private ownership of capital is exploitation and free societies are SYSTEMICALLY corrupt (or "racist" in the currently fashionable iteration of Marxist theory.)
Of course every collectivist, statist philosophy is inherently violent, because sooner or later they must use force to compel obedience, but Marxism gets to looting, burning, beating, and killing VERY quickly because it sells itself as a revolution against systemic corruption.
We don't reflect enough on how every exercise of state power is an implicit threat to use force. As I believe Walter Williams once put it, even the most benign-sounding law ends with an implied "... or you'll be killed," because that is the final outcome of disobedience.
I got in one really big fight in grade school. I was a Catholic kid living in a pleasant, mostly Jewish neighborhood. One day I saw some Jewish classmates picking on a very small Orthodox boy for wearing his yarmulke. My friends and I stepped in to defend him. Punches flew.
The aftermath, when everyone was cooling their heels in detention, involved us comically confused Christian kids asking the Orthodox boy what the yarmulke was, why he wore it to school, and why the heck would other Jewish kids give him a hard time about it.
We didn't know what was going on that day. We just saw a little guy getting shoved around by a bunch of big guys. We learned a lot that day, and made a new friend who was part of our little outcast crew ever afterward. (Everything feels like forever when you're that age.)
The Left's infamous softness on crime flows from the core Marxist dynamic of oppressors vs. oppressed. If profit is theft, then thieves who steal from capitalism's unfair winners are just "taking back" what is rightfully theirs. Criminals have no agency.
This is why real-world experiences with crime and policing are always baffling to Democrat politicians and left-wing academics. They cannot accept the notion that criminals respond rationally to incentives and opportunities - i.e. intensive policing and prosecution reduce crime.
Leftist media tends to vomit out headlines like "Crime Rates Decline Despite Increase in Jail Population" because they cannot accept that policing and prosecution takes career criminals off the street and intimidates would-be lawbreakers by increasing the cost of crime.
Watching Dems chirp in unison that OF COURSE they care about anti-Semitic violence, BUT let's not forget about all the Islamophobia, is a hilarious reminder that they really do act as a hive-mind. They don't have principles, they have focus-grouped copy-pasted press releases.
Note well, American Jewish voters, that Dems only belatedly emitted this pre-written wheeze of moral equivalence because the wave of anti-Semitic violence perpetrated by their preferred constituents grew so huge that their media couldn't hide the story any more.
The variables in the Democrats' Marxist core operating system haven't changed. Jews are still Evil Rich White Guys and Palestinian terrorists are still Oppressed Brown People. Dems only croaked out this "all lives matter" junk when they absolutely had to, not a moment sooner.
It's sad how many people have been programmed to think Marxism and socialism just mean "generous welfare benefits," so anyone who criticizes those ideologies is just a meanie who wants poor people to starve.
That's not thinking, it's regurgitating Marxist cant. Of COURSE totalitarian collectivists want to be given sole credit for "caring about the poor" - or more importantly, to make people think that only be submitting to their toxic ideologies can the unfortunate be cared for.
The idea does not survive a moment of reflection, or a single look at the life in the real world. The unfortunate benefit far more - orders of magnitude more - from the prosperity and technological innovation of capitalism than from the allegedly tender ministrations of Marxists.
The Left loves cancel culture, but it needs to immunize properly credentialed members of the Left and its Journalism Guild from cancellation, so it's working hard to plant the idea that criticism of them is always "bad faith" and should be ignored.
It's a nifty racket. Lefties can dig up ancient comments or actions from decades ago, or fabricate controversy, but as soon as a credentialed lefty is hit with smelly old email, tweet, or Facebook post, suddenly the intentions of the people who uncovered it are the story.
Of course, lefties aren't going to dig up "problematic" material about credentialed lefties, so everything that ever threatens people of the Left with cancellation will come from someone who isn't a leftie, and is therefore acting in "bad faith" by definition.