I have a certain appreciation and respect for this man's "damn the torpedos" attitude. What continues to annoy the hell out of me is conservatives either engaging in revisionism of Jan. 6 ("it was Antifa") or denial ("they were just tourists").
Yes, Jan 6 was buffoonish, delusional, and had no chance of success, but it was understood by many, maybe most, participants as a kind of "revolution," a means of securing the presidency for Trump. To deny this is simply to disconnect from reality in the name of partisanship.
J6 was, in its way, an insult to the grand tradition of *coups d'état*—it was comprised of goofballs acting like goofballs, getting fleeced by the grifters who organized it. It was not a tightly organized and disciplined action for the seizing power and legitimacy.
But J6, and the QAnon movement that accompanied it, have to be understood on their own terms: an episode of mass delusion, yes, but also part of the history of populist unrest and insurrection. Lying about this is not noble; it's ignoble self-deception.
The least you can say about Michael Timbrook is that he has balls. People like Tucker Carlson, who obfuscate the matter—as they obfuscate ever important matter—are useless hacks.
As for the people whining about the death of Ashli Babbitt, if this were any other century, dozens of J6 partisan would have been summarily shot by the army or police. The fact that she was the only one is what's remarkable.
Conservatives love talking about "revolution"—they hoard guns, declare themselves "sovereign citizens," and fantasize about insurrection. But when they are treated as *partisans* by the government, they immediately whine about their "rights" or deny that they were even there.
If you are going to take part in revolutionary action—not just a protest, but an attempt to force the government to bend to your will or change the regime—then you are risking your life. Every other revolutionary understood this. MAGA, no so much—except this guy!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Richard 🌞 Spencer

Richard 🌞 Spencer Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RichardBSpencer

19 May
This story embodies the entire Trump episode for me, its contradictions and "Trump vs. Trump" quality.

axios.com/off-the-rails-…
One of the most common defenses of Trump in the dissident sphere is that "he's got good instincts"—with that admission that he's out of his depth or constantly undermined by Jared, the media, Deep State, and GOP. But "Trump's heart," I was told, "was in the right place."
Here we have Exhibit A for such a defense. Trump tried to go full Ron Paul at the 11th hour—change the course of American history no less—but was prevented by his own incompetence and the Deep State dragging its feet.
Read 17 tweets
12 May
What we see in these battles between the Trumps and the Cheneys is a culture war—or, more accurately, a class war—over the aesthetics and rhetoric of the GOP. It’s not about ideology or policy; it’s about who will get pandered to most.
It’s not wrong to say that Trump thinks Cheney is “bad for our country” because she doesn’t release aggressively moronic public statements like this.
The GOP’s “civil war” has little to nothing to do with actual policy or vision. On all critical matters, the camps are aligned. Trump’s “populism” never actually went beyond promoting Americans’ God-given right to industrial-strength toilet flushing and scalding hot showers.
Read 7 tweets
11 May
Probably an overstatement... but not wrong either.
Clearly, the American Left is headed in the same as the direction as most of the world—Israel is viewed as illegitimate. Whether that will amount to whining about Palestinians on Twitter, and vaguely demanding a two-state solution, or actual policy, remains to be seen.
The only non-Jewish community on Earth that is “all in” with Israel is White Christians in the South and Midwest—who are, in fact, more Zionists than the Jews. And, for the time being, the leaders of the Democratic Party are staunchly Zionist.
Read 4 tweets
6 May
Q’s second life will be as a full-on religion: “We Are The Plan.” I would not underestimate its appeal.

t.me/QNewsOfficialT…
This presentation reminds me a lot of "Zeitgeist" viral video from 10-15 years ago. It offers a "gnostic" and "Manichaean" outlook. It gets some things right, which makes it even more insidious. The whole appeal is "awakening"—and thus redeeming the fallen world.
The key qualities to it are

+ a sinful, fallen world
+ absolute evil at the top levels of the political order
+ good, Christian patriots, who are victims and make up the resistance
+ revelation (in this case of hypocrisy and crimes)
=> redemption
Read 8 tweets
29 Apr
America has never really been a nation-state. It’s essence is as a *frontier*. FJ Turner really got that right. The frontier, in this sense, is open, endless space, and specifically not a border separating hostile peoples.
From its inception up until 1924, America never had a real *immigration* policy. It had a naturalization policy, and was still open to most all comers. Between 1924-1965, America was, sort of, a nation, with mass assimilation to WASP norms. But that’s the exception not the rule.
After 1939, America’s imperial demands were so great that to even think of it as a nation-state—like, say, Finland—totally obscures its dynamic and logic.
Read 7 tweets
26 Apr
I don't remember if I spoke about this at length on a podcast ... but, after thinking through things, I'm generally of the opinion that the Odal rune that appeared at CPAC was *intentional*. But that only raises more questions.
I don't think that whoever was behind this meant for the CPAC audience to recognize it and endorse it. Obviously, if CPAC flew a Swastika banner, its audience—the majority of whom are Christian-Zionist and obsessive about the Holocaust—would shriek back in horror.
But if a symbol is meant to resonate on the unconscious, then why this symbol? It wouldn't be known by many, if not most, attendees, and Nazi Paganism isn't the image conservative seek to project. In their minds, they were the ones who *defeated* the Nazis.
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(