We are living through an era, analogous to 1868 - 1924, when the Labour Party was formed.
The Whigs fell apart from internal corruption(sounds familiar?), and while the Liberals were formed, many of the same people were involved.
thread 1/8
Subsequently, Lloyd George was also hugely corrupt, and the Liberals themselves fell.
The Labour Party entered Parliament in 1924, nearly one hundred years ago.
Ramsey McDonald was merely another carpetbagger, and it took another World War to see real change under Atlee.
2/8
Many "great" men, and some women entered the Labour Party, and for a while, Harold Wilson held them together, rather in the manner of a circus ringmaster.
But Roy Jenkin's ego got the better of both him and the situation.
3/8
So the SDP was formed, with no activists, but wads of Sainsbury's money, much of the middle class was peeled off of Labour once more.
They were the early precursors to today's remainers, who prefer the EU to take responsibility, and who are the enemies of self-determination.
4/8
In the meantime, Kinnock got busy with chucking Socialists out of the Labour Party, to make it "electable".
The SDP and the Liberals had a shotgun wedding, marrying Liberal activists with Sainsbury's money. This would lead to the death of Charles Kennedy.
5/8
Then the real "middle man" arrived in Labour, and Tony Blair proceeded to chuck Clause IV and actual Socialism out of the Labour Party.
He also got rid of nearly 5 million voters ...
6/8
Several people have mentioned a belief in a "core Labour vote" of around 8 million.
The events of 2019, and subsequently, have proved this to be an illusion ...
7/8
There is actually a clear and large majority in this country for real change - but they have no loyalty to Labour, because the Labour Party has shown no loyalty to them.
Friends, subjects, countrymen, lend me your ears;
I come to bury Labour, not to praise it.
The evil that men do lives after them;
The good is oft interred with their bones;
So let it be with Labour. The noble Keith
Hath told you Labour was ambitious:
If it were so, it was a grievous fault,
And grievously hath Keith disinterred it.
Here, under leave of Mandrakesom and the rest–
For Keith is an "honourable" man;
So are they all, all "honourable" men–
Come I to speak in Labour’s funeral.
Labour was my part, faithful and just to me:
But Keiths says he IS ambitious;
And Keith IS an "honourable" man.
He hath sent many lefties home to Coventry
Whose subs did the Party coffers fill:
Did this in Corbyn seem ambitious?
It's complete. But the previously tabled attempt in 2018 was gerrymandered into submission ...
The Bill would:
• reinstate the government’s duty to provide the NHS in England,
• re-establish NHS England as a special health authority with regional committees and
modified functions,
• re-establish District Health Authorities, with Family Health Services Committees to administer arrangements with GPs, dentists and others,
We are going to have to face a simple and devastating truth on the left. Strategically, we are a fucking disaster.
Plans, cunning or otherwise, 'R NOT US.
Basically, in the long term, we have not a clue.
We are a tribe of Micawbers, "waiting for something to turn up".
"Not at all, and now, since this is a red-letter day in that I am hourly expecting something extraordinary to turn up, let us return and discover what culinary triumphs Mrs. Micawber has prepared for us."
We should rather seek out Mrs. Whiplash. 😒
On the rare occasion that something DOES turn up, like @jeremycorbyn , we fuck it up. In spades.
Why did we not turn up at Southside, with knobkerries and fire necklaces??? I will never know.