This article claims that Trump "has begun crafting a policy agenda outlining a MAGA doctrine for the party," but, remarkably, beyond the vaguest generalities, it says next-to-nothing about what that policy agenda will contain. /1
politi.co/34vmiBD
In 1952, Dwight Eisenhower said, "our form of government has no sense unless it is founded in a deeply felt religious faith, and I don't care what it is." And that's pretty much the degree of policy specificity contained herein./2
With considerable understatement, it says that "detailed policy planks have never been the most notable feature of Trump’s political appeal" but nonetheless tells us that "its construction has been teased and talked about for weeks." Ok, then, what do we have so far? /3
Let’s hear from Newt Gingrich, its “main architect.” What does he have to say? Looks like its an Iraq war vintage slogan (“bring it on”) with a few slightly-updated culture war feints. The single actual policy idea (school choice), dates from the days of massive resistance./4
I guess U.S. historians should be flattered that the bulk of Gingrich's "policy" agenda focuses on our work. But it looks like Gingrich wants to mandate that some bureaucrat from Washington DC dictating what and how we research and teach./5
Other than a slogan, a claim that it should be "positive" and the mention of "school choice" this is the sum and substance of Gingrich's policy suggestions: "teaching American history for real, abolishing the ‘1619 Project,’ eliminating critical race theory." /6
I can see how this agenda addresses the concerns of people in heartland worried about low wages, costly child care expenses, educational debt, flooding caused by global warming, food insecurity, and insufficient health care coverage. /7
As an aside, can we dispense once and for all with the myth that Trump "refused to touch entitlements." This is false, although it is endlessly repeated./8
nytimes.com/2020/01/22/us/…
The truth is not that Donald Trump lacks a "policy agenda." It is rather that his is no different from standard GOP boilerplate--tax cuts for the rich, take away health care from millions, deregulation, climate change denial, eliminate reproductive choice, & 24/7 culture war./9
One thing to praise about the article is that it doesn't use the word "populist" once. /10
And it should be clear that white identity politics and grievance dog whistles underlie this "policy agenda."/11
School choice ✅
"American history for real" ✅
"Abolishing the 1619 Project" ✅
"Eliminating critical race theory" ✅
Note Gingrich's language. In his framing, history is not open to debate and interpretation; rather, there is a single 'real' version. Opposing viewpoints, which center the African American experience, must not be contested but "abolished" and "eliminated." /12

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Lawrence Glickman

Lawrence Glickman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @LarryGlickman

24 May
The story is not "partisan gridlock" but Republican negation. The GOP unanimously voted against Covid Relief, as they did against the Obama Stimulus, as they did against Obamacare. And McConnell says 100% of his focus is on stopping Dem legislation.
nytimes.com/2021/05/23/us/…
Why is it that this obvious context and framing is missing from so much of the analysis of these negotiations? Why is the McConnell quote not prominently mentioned, along with the GOP track record? /2
Is the essence of the story really that the two parties are "sparring over the size of the infrastructure bill"? It can only be framed that way by disregarding recent history and the explicit statements of the GOP Senate leader.
wsj.com/articles/mccon…
/3
Read 5 tweets
24 May
This piece consistently overemphasizes Trump's break from GOP "traditions." There are some significant ruptures, to be sure, but also a lot of continuity./1 washingtonpost.com/politics/repub…
The Trump era GOP’s signature accomplishment was a tax cut for the rich. They nearly succeeded in taking health care from millions. Trump deregulated like mad. He denied global warming and appointed right-wing judges. Where, in these things, is a “push” from GOP traditions? /2 Image
How can @michaelscherer and @jdawsey1 describe “infrastructure” as a “Trumpian priority”? Trump famously did nothing on this front. Equally implausible, in light of recent history, is their description of “limited government” and “lower debt” as “conservative traditions.” /3 Image
Read 5 tweets
22 May
It is irresponsible for journalists not to lede with recent GOP history & McConnell’s explicit claim that his caucus will seek to derail any major Biden proposal. There is no reason to highlight their supposed “skepticism,” which suggests good faith. /1 washingtonpost.com/us-policy/2021…
Treating the GOP as if their recent history of full-throttled rejectionism wasn’t their guiding principle. /2
Live action shot of the coverage of the Republican Party skeptically "balking" at Biden's infrastructure proposal. /3
Read 4 tweets
21 May
This is an iteration of a backlash impulse that dates to the Reconstruction era. /1
The idea that time is running out--that it was always, as I showed in my book, FREE ENTERPRISE: AN AMERICAN HISTORY, "five minutes to midnight"--is central to the existential framing of all backlashes. /2
yalebooks.yale.edu/book/978030023…
So too was the idea that the rule of law was provisional, that certain people were not bound by its strictures. As one critic of the "recent revolutionary acts of Congress" said in 1868, they would "provoke on the part of those immediately affected by them violent resistance."/3
Read 9 tweets
20 May
This piece only hints at what might have been Moynihan's most lasting legacy: his pronouncement that the Reagan-era GOP had become the "party of ideas."/1 nytimes.com/2021/05/15/boo…
I wrote a piece for @BostonReview about Moynihan's central role in popularizing this idea. /2
bostonreview.net/politics/lawre…
Personally, I don't find Moynihan's positing "the seeming incapacity of government to get anything right” to be a "great insight." Instead, I consider it part of the damaging denigration of government that mainstream politicians have only recently beginning to challenge./3
Read 5 tweets
11 May
So much of the reporting not only assumes good faith on the part of Republicans, it ignores McConnell’s explicit policy of rejecting any major Biden initiative (as the GOP did with Obama), no matter how necessary or popular. The faux naiveté is maddening. /1
Here’s a good example: a passage taking as fact “the fiscal austerity….emerging within her own [Capito’s] party.” As Joe Biden might say, “Come on, Man!” /2
And then there is this passage, in which Capito’s complete inversion of recent history is quoted at length, with no context whatsoever—say about how Obama wasted six months for Republican moderates to sign onto the ACA which they, predictably, rejected as a bloc. /3
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(