The European Cup Final:
Chelsea’s shape vs City’s press.
A tricky conundrum for Pep 1/
Tuchel’s Chelsea set up in a 3-4-2-1.
3 centre backs across the back line play behind a midfield 2 of Kante and Jorginho with wing backs wide and Mount, Havertz and Werner up top 2/
There are various challenges this formation creates for City.
Here I’m going to concentrate on City’s press. City have generally pressed in a 4-4-2/4-2-4 in the last few months. It matches up well against a back 4 and midfield 2, as we can see against Gladbach in the last 16 3/
Pressing in a 4-4-2/4-2-4 also allows City to keep a flat back 4 in place. The full backs are only pulled out of position if the press ahead of them is broken, meaning City have numbers back to deal with any through balls or balls over the top 4/
Chelsea’s back 3 with 2 midfielders ahead of them pose a different problem. In the build up the midfielders drop close to the back 3, giving Chelsea a compact 5 man build up 5/
In the FA Cup semi final City tried to combat this by dropping De Bruyne off the front line. The front 3 pressed Chelsea’s back 3 with De Bruyne sat on their midfield 2. But Chelsea still enjoyed a numerical advantage 6/
City’s wingers tried to help De Bruyne by tucking into midfield when the ball was on the opposite flank to match up with Kante and Jorginho. Here we can see Torres taking up a central position 7/
Chelsea’s wing backs generally stay very wide. In the build up they often drop back to offer an outlet. Here Chelsea have the 5 vs 4 advantage to begin with. Their wing backs are also offering support wide. Let’s run this move on 8/
Torres’ central position, trying to match up Chelsea’s midfield, naturally leaves a Chelsea centre back free, in this case Rudiger. Chelsea work it across to him and he has the time afforded to him by Torres’ position to take a touch and play a simple pass wide to Chilwell 9/
Pep decided to use his full backs to press Chelsea’s wing backs in the semi final. We can see Cancelo rushing towards Chilwell here. City’s midfield 2 were sat deeper covering the centre of the pitch 10/
We wouldn’t normally see City’s full backs this far up the pitch pressing. But this is a symptom of Chelsea being able to include 7 players in their build up by dropping the wing backs in 11/
Chilwell plays a one two inside with Jorginho. Cancelo follows him. Sterling has pulled off the front line to mark Jorginho but this leaves Silva free for the pass from Chilwell. Cancelo retreats.
Chelsea always have a numerical advantage somewhere from the initial 5 vs 4 12/
Within 3 passes the ball is with James, the right wing back. He’s immediately pressed by City’s left back Mendy. Note Mount’s position at the bottom of each shot - he stays pushed high, he hasn’t followed Cancelo back and is often ahead of City’s midfield 2 13/
James and Kante work the ball down the line to Ziyech. Throughout this move Ziyech and Werner have been ahead of City’s midfield, often 2 vs 2 with the centre backs because City’s full backs are pushed on pressing 14/
In this case Cancelo has managed to make it back from his initial press but this still leaves City 3 vs 3. Ziyech can’t turn quickly enough to take advantage this time and the move fizzles out 15/
There were plenty of other examples where City were caught 2 vs 2 at the back or even 2 vs 3. The goal came from such an occasion 16/
Chelsea’s build up is a difficult puzzle to solve. If you want to press them you need lots of numbers to combat what becomes a 7 man build up when the wing backs drop in 17/
In theory using your full backs to press the wing backs shouldn’t be a problem. It leaves 2 mids and 2 cbs against Chelsea’s 3 attackers. But with City’s mids wanting to hold the centre of the pitch and Chelsea’s attackers happy to play ahead of them, it creates problems 18/
2 vs 2s are something City have managed to avoid since Dias’ arrival. But there is no easy answer to pressing a build up featuring 7 players without leaving opportunities for the remaining 3 attackers 19/
City have taken control of matches this season, often stifling the opposition in the press. To do that against Chelsea could require a little more thinking than usual for Pep 20//
We saw City push Walker up into the front line in possession last night from out wide. It’s one solution to our full back conundrum at the moment. But like all the others, it’s imperfect 1/
Walker got into some great positions down the wing in the 1st half. But it’s what he does with the ball once he gets into those positions where the issues lie. Last night he didn’t complete any of the 4 crosses he attempted and wasted some other good positions 2/
Cancelo’s departure has left City short of options at full back. Guardiola was comfortable pushing Cancelo up the wing, knowing his quality in possession, and inverting him. He’d had success doing both roles whilst still carrying some question marks over his defensive ability 3/
The goal we conceded against Villa highlighted one of the issues a 3-2 build-up can create 1/
City have been using a 3-2 shape in the build-up since the resumption after the World Cup. On Sunday, Bernardo Silva formed the 2 with Rodri, dropping into a left back role out of possession when necessary 2/
Villa didn’t implement a great press on Sunday and were reluctant to commit bodies to it. We can see they are simply deploying their front 2 to block off the pass into Rodri and Bernardo, clogging up the centre of the pitch and challenging City’s back line to go round them 3/
Cancelo’s exit, without replacement, leaves City shorter on quality and flexibility 1/
Whatever went on, ultimately a decision was taken that there was no way back for Cancelo and a loan move to one of the best teams in Europe became a preferable solution for City.
It leaves a relatively light squad by design, in terms of numbers, another man down 2/
Last season we had Cancelo and Zinchenko as left back options. They could both play wide or inverted in possession. Ake played some matches at lb when City wanted to build in a back 3. Walker/Cancelo were the right back options. Even then, the squad felt light at full back 3/
The balance between control and risk.
Attacking a back 5.
Gamestate. 1/
It felt like a really frustrating afternoon at the Etihad on Saturday.
For the 2nd home league match running City dropped points to unfancied opposition.
This gets long and rambling, so apologies for that, but it was that type of performance wasn’t it 2/
City continued with the 3-2 shape in possession that worked well against Leeds and L’pool with Lewis tucking in with Rodri and Stones and Ake wide of Akanji. Both those opponents set up in a 4-3-3 and City were able to exert dominance whilst outnumbering the their back lines 3/
Stones inverting yesterday, allied to Leicester’s extremely defensive set up, saw Rodri regularly unleashed into City’s attacks while the score remained level 1/
Here Laporte passes into Stones who has inverted in next to Rodri. With Maddison and Vardy Leicester’s furthest men forward, the pass into Stones is the trigger for Rodri to head up the pitch towards the front line. City still have 3 back to deal with transitions 2/
When Bernardo receives it from Stones and cuts inside, Rodri makes a run in behind. He isn’t used by Bernardo but this is nosebleed territory for Rodri 3/
Creating numerical parity with Ederson in the initial phase of the build up and the knock-on effect
1/
City utilised Ederson to build in a 4-2 at times yesterday. It frees up Cancelo to play high whilst maintaining an initial 4 in the build up, matching Southampton’s initial press.
*this isn’t from a goal kick, it’s open play.
2/
Ederson plays a pass out to Cancelo who drops from his higher starting position. Because Cancelo isn’t part of the initial back line anymore, it’s Kyle Walker-Peters, the opponents left back, who presses him 3/