Susan Collins’ PAC is under investigation for what the FBI calls a “massive scheme to illegally finance” her re-election bid.

The GOP uses her to pitch these things, because the media continues to allow her to pretend that she is a “moderate,” as if she is materially different.
“The FBI is investigating what it describes as a massive scheme to illegally finance Sen. Susan Collins' 2020 re-election bid”

axios.com/susan-collins-…
Also, ICYMI

Aug 2019:

“Leonard Leo, a central figure in the Brett Kavanaugh nomination, bought the Northeast Harbor mansion last fall. This month, it hosted a fundraiser for Sen. Susan Collins that drew protesters.”

pressherald.com/2019/08/18/why…
In other words, Collins doesn’t “face an uphill battle with Mitch McConnell.”

McConnell knows what his caucus is doing, and she likely wouldn’t be doing it without his approval.

The media frames it as an internal “battle,” giving it credibility, just as the GOP expects it to.
It’s also worth calling out Collins’ changes on their merit.

This would incentivize the GOP to essentially filibuster committee staffing for 10 days, so they can choose their own staff.

They don’t seek bipartisan. They want it to devolve into yet another highly partisan circus.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with ClearingTheFog

ClearingTheFog Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @clearing_fog

25 May
I’ve had a couple of people ask me for the beginner’s guide to what all the DOJ hubbub is about.

Here are a couple of threads to read, in order, to catch up.

First, Asha’s thread goes back to what Mueller did & didn’t do, and what Barr did.

Read, then come back & scroll 👇

/1
Now, one important thing that Asha didn’t mention (probably for brevity), is that Barr didn’t act alone.

Tweet 4 in her thread leaves out a huge part of the story, which is what all of the Garland/DOJ/Court talk is about today.

Instead of “I’ll do it,” what Barr really did..
/2 Image
Barr actually *conspired* with Rosenstein and the OLC (who is supposed to just provide legal counsel), to fabricate a memo that would *justify* his plan to mislead everyone about the Mueller report.

Judge A.B. Jackson realized this & ordered DOJ to release that memo.

👇
/3
Read 8 tweets
25 May
I am not a lawyer, but after viewing Judge Amy Berman Jackson's unredacted memo, I think it is pretty clear that Merrick Garland is not protecting Bill Barr.

The parts that I have highlighted here are the parts that were previously redacted; Garland agreed to unredact this.

/1
Unredacted: Jackson's clear opinion that Barr's DOJ was intentionally dishonest, concealing the content of the OLC memo and misrepresenting its purpose to the court.

Recurring theme here: Jackson exposed the OLC memo for what it was - part of a political PR strategy.
Unredacted: The memo was crafted - at Bill Barr's request - to "recommend" that Barr make a judgement call about Mueller's report.

Why? Because the underlying motivation behind the memo was, "getting a jump on public relations."
Read 9 tweets
24 May
Question for legal Twitter:

If a candidate runs under a marijuana legalization party, and there is documented evidence that he had no interest in pursuing the party’s platform (was simply running to siphon votes), would voters have grounds to sue him for Honest Services Fraud?
In addition to that, if there were evidence of a nationally coordinated scheme to run fraudulent candidates in this way (rather than organic, individual choices by candidates) could that constitute racketeering?
@glennkirschner2 @DirkSchwenk @marceelias @BoutrousTed @lauferlaw

Two separate legal questions above... any thoughts/insights? :-)
Read 4 tweets
24 May
Did the GOP use fraudulent candidates to control the Minnesota state Senate?

The Republican Party currently maintains a majority in the MN Senate by a single vote: 35-34.

It appears they leveraged the growing popularity of two marijuana parties to hold on to power.

/1
In 2018, two marijuana legalization parties broke the popularity barrier to achieve Major Party status under MN state law.

This allowed them to appear on statewide ballots without needing to collect signatures - but it also meant they lost control over who ran under their name.
Leading up to the 2020 election, as early as June, MN journalists were seeing a trend - candidates running for Senate under these two parties, who had no experience, weren’t even particularly active on the issue, and who appeared to be quite Republican.

minnesotareformer.com/2020/06/15/som…
Read 10 tweets
20 May
“Money laundering is a crime that makes other crimes possible. It can accelerate economic inequality, drain public funds, undermine democracy, and destabilize nations — and the banks play a key role.”

buzzfeednews.com/article/jasonl…
“The Trump administration has made it even harder to hold executives personally accountable, under guidance by former deputy attorney general Rod Rosenstein that warned government agencies against “piling on.”
How to Actually Prosecute the Financial Crimes of the Very Rich

“I quit the DOJ because I no longer wanted to participate in a system this permissive.”

Paul E. Pelletier
Former federal financial-crimes prosecutor

theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/…
Read 5 tweets
19 May
Two days after Biden was inaugurated, I said that, as long as we can root out dark money and opaque funding sources in our political system, Dems would be in a great position to win in 2022.

I still believe this, which is why I have spent so much time bringing attention to it.
In Florida, three state Senate seats were bought with dark money - by covertly funding fake ghost candidates to steal votes from Dems.

These are the ones that we know about.
Dark money vehicles are also responsible for funding and coordinating most of the astroturf style propaganda operations that continue to divide us against each other and erode confidence in our government.

Including the StopTheSteal movement itself.
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(