Something we need to be clear on: When one speaks of different "ontology" for men and women, they either do not know what ontology means, or they have changed the meaning, or they are in serious error in their anthropology.
This language is a departure for orthodoxy.
This language is a departure for orthodoxy.
It has consequences. If men and women are ontologically different, then for whom did Christ die? Did he die as a man?
Or did he die as a human?
Did he redeem man?
Or did he redeem humans?
If men and women are ontologically different, men are saved by Christ, women by submission
Or did he die as a human?
Did he redeem man?
Or did he redeem humans?
If men and women are ontologically different, men are saved by Christ, women by submission
If you think that CBMW is about order in the home, think again.
It is a serious departure from orthodoxy under the guise of fighting worldliness.
At bottom, it is ugly and contrary to the gospel.
It is a serious departure from orthodoxy under the guise of fighting worldliness.
At bottom, it is ugly and contrary to the gospel.
Does our salvation lie in "Biblical manhood" or in "biblical womanhood" or does it lie in our union with Christ by faith, whether male or female?
It makes a difference. One is the gospel. The other is not.
It makes a difference. One is the gospel. The other is not.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
