Texas HB 3979 blocks Critical Race Theory in public schools. It's hard to imagine any prosecutions resulting. But it makes teachers vulnerable to parents' complaints—especially of the hot-take variety. And it could have unintended consequences.

Let's take a look, shall we?

1/10
Some of Texas HB 3979 is fine. It requires that students learn about founding documents, the 13th, 14th, 15th Amendments, Native American history, etc. Correct me if an amendment changes this. But it's got some wacky & dangerous language. It's a mess.
2/10
capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/87R/se…
The wording of Texas HB 3979 clearly shows its main motivation is to protect white children from any sense of the moral weight of history. But it's also aimed at a non-existent threat: teachers who are telling kids they are to blame as individuals for racism writ large.
3/10
Texas HB 3979 specifically bans the 1619 Project. Not only is that censorship, it's counterproductive. "An understanding of The 1619 Project," I note, is required if you want to argue against it, or to know why some historians disagree with parts. The law mandates ignorance.
4/10
HB 3979 bans teaching "slavery and racism are anything other than...betrayals of...the authentic founding principles." This forces teachers to say the Constitution's framers betrayed our founding principles. They have to call the slaveholding Texas Republic anti-American.
5/10
I don't think HB 3979 is meant to call our founders betrayers. But it's not a fine point. From the 3/5ths clause to free states that barred free Black people, from Washington hunting escapees to Texas's ban on anyone freeing enslaved people, slavery & racism was everywhere.
6/10
Note that I am not attacking the framers or the founding of the United States. To have any real understanding of history, you have to see contradictions. People commit evil with one hand & do good with the other. Some made a better world possible—yet we see the evil.

7/10
And then there's this: HB 3979's authors are very concerned that teachers should feel free to avoid any controversy. If they do, they must teach all sides "without giving deference to any one perspective." Equal time for mass murderers of Sand Creek? Or the Holocaust? Nuts.
8/10
Reversing HB 3979 would require a very brave teacher to treat it literally. Teach that all the Founders, Abraham Lincoln, etc., deviated from & betrayed our founding principles. Discuss the Weather Underground or Al Qaeda with an all-sides-deserve-fairness approach. Crazy.
9/10
My point: Censoring teachers, especially for political reasons, sets a bad tone & has vile unintended consequences.

If I've made a mistake in the foregoing discussion of Texas HB 3979, I regret the errors. I looked at the legislature's website here.
10/10
capitol.texas.gov/BillLookup/Tex…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with T.J. Stiles

T.J. Stiles Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TJStiles_Author

7 Apr
Academic historians fret about not reaching the public. It's not enough to say (even if true), "I'm doing such important & interesting work." It's about writing.

First, accept that work that doesn't signal that it's for academics only can still be cutting-edge scholarship.
1/5
There are conventions for journal articles & monographs that serve a professional purpose, & signal that they are for fellow scholars. That's fine! But historians should embrace serious work that doesn't follow these conventions. It's not dumbing down to depart from them.
2/5
Second, academic historians who want a wide audience need to read fiction & compelling nonfiction journalism, & ask why it's appealing. It's not about color, an anecdote, an important fact. It's about giving the reader a reason to go on to the next page—the next paragraph.
3/5
Read 5 tweets
3 Jan
Just Trump's opening remarks are lunacy. His first reason for asserting fraud is rally size. He claims 50,000 voters were told they couldn't vote because they already did & 100,000s of ballots were forged. No court has seen *any* evidence for any of this.
washingtonpost.com/politics/trump…
At about 7:29, he says, "We won every state and every single statehouse.... We won Congress..."

I had jokingly suggested that Trump should just claim that he won every state. Why limit himself, if he's going to make stuff up? Lo and behold, he did.
He claims 5,000 dead Georgians voted. "They" (whoever "they" are, they sure work hard) "went through obituaries." I wonder if they have a mole inside the top-secret obit-reading operation. My God, Trump just monologues, on and on and on. Now he's making up numbers about Detroit.
Read 21 tweets
2 Jan
Historian @KevinLevin mentioned a new biography of Lee coming this fall. I have no knowledge or opinion of it. But some historians asked, "Do we really need a new biography of Lee?" The answer is easy: always—if done right. The reasons are complicated. 1/7
penguinrandomhouse.com/books/253141/l…
Of course, I wrote about a man who is even more frequently chronicled and even more unpopular than Lee—though he contributed materially to Lee's defeat. I'd argue it was worth doing. I see four reasons for new biographies of old subjects.
2/7
indiebound.org/book/978030747…
First, new questions. I explored Custer in Reconstruction, his role in politics, his place in intellectual, environmental, & economic history. Unexpected contexts change how we see familiar figures, leading to surprising historical insight—though they don't rehabilitate.
3/7
Read 8 tweets
4 Aug 20
Jesse James & Donald Trump: A thread.

Trump's reelection slogans come straight from the long history of white supremacy:
1) "Law & Order"
2) "Radical left governors & mayors"
3) "Protect the suburbs [from black people]"

Jesse James's life illuminates their meaning.
1/10
I'm not the great scholar of white supremacy, but I see a repeated pattern, including in Jesse James's life.

1) "Law & order" represents the *aggression* of white supremacy. Before the Civil War, the growing challenge to the slaveholders' dominance bred aggressive demands.
2/10
The proximate cause of the Civil War was the demand for *more* by slaveholders—especially new territory. Proslavery militants in Missouri (home of Jesse James, born 1847) organized "Border Ruffian" paramilitary units to force slavery on the neighboring Kansas Territory.
3/10
Read 11 tweets
24 Mar 20
As a public service, here’s a summary of President Trump’s message to the American people so far:
1) The virus is nothing! You won’t even notice you’re sick. Go to work. Shake a lot of hands.
2) IT’S A FREAKING CHINESE INVASION!
3) A hoax. Fake news & Democrats want to ruin me...
4) I’m so focused on this. I’m super aggressive and a natural born scientist and took all the steps no one thought I should take before I was even president. In sum, Obama—swine flu—total disaster.
5) It will go away in a miracle. It’s more of a February virus. Hates April...
6) You reporters with your questions, always questioning me! I hate you all! You die now!
7) There’s this hair-loss drug I’m super-sure will cure the China virus. Right, doctor?
8) Don’t look at me. The governors are in charge. They should fight each other for the ventilators...
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(