Our response to covid has a lot of bad implications for the fight against climate change, a far tougher collective action problem. Among the worst is the exposure of "trust the science" as a kind of secular faith, not a genuine defense of scientific thinking. This took many forms
There was a failure to understand time-critical decision making under uncertainty, a totemistic belief in peer-reviewed publication as the only fount of truth, an ongoing campaign of moralizing outrage against dissenting positions and thinkers who were later vindicated
Despite heroic efforts, many countries seemed incapable of learning from one another, and there was no ability to coordinate an adequate international response. Difficult concepts and dilemmas were never (in the US, at least) communicated in a way the public could understand
I find it extremely surprising that this experience does not appear to have colored people's beliefs on the correct policy response to climate change, or our chances of success on that front. This was a dress rehearsal that failed in every imaginable dimension
Climate science is far more complex than virology, the time scales are too long, the field is by necessity full of guesswork, and the only effective interventions have to be transnational. Our political system and our journalists are not up to the task of getting this right
Step one of somehow fixing this has to be communicating the core idea of science—that you repeatedly change your mind based on evidence (or lack of evidence!), that you do this rigorously, and that finding out you were wrong about something is a sign that you're winning
Realistically, though, it's time to start thinking harder about climate mitigation and be more honest in communicating the inevitability of what is coming. Say goodbye to Miami and hello to Canadian beach vacations. Maybe fund some weird science projects at large scale.
Space mirror, ocean seeding, reforestation, mass electrification, setting off a volcano or two—we should go to town. Humanity can at least go out with a bang, and we have a much better shot at solutions that involve building things than ones that require restraining ourselves
Probably a good idea to leave a note on the Moon explaining what we tried, unless we're have some plan to use that as planetary sunscreen
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
There's a recurring theme in Democratic circles that I think is under-examined, that goes "if only the rules were fair our party would win bigly". It's part of a wider feeling of denial about the last few years. I think Nate is right to call this out, and we need a better plan.
If you already can't imagine why people voted for Trump, or your thesis is some version of "they are evil", then you're not in a good position to think realistically about outcomes of future elections. You have to be able to confront the present before you can plan for the future
I turned in my prognostication card after two elections, but I am very grateful to the various candidates I worked with for giving me the chance to see Trump districts and meet Trump voters, and come away more confused and wary about my own political beliefs than when I started
Excellent short thread about CA fires that applies to a lot of aspects of climate change. Underlying trends are often dominated by randomness. When the two line up, you break all records. But if the two are opposed, you can have deceptively mild outcomes even as trends get worse.
Unfortunately human beings don't see enough years in their lifetime for some of the longer patterns to be visible. Others only become visible on human time scales when it is far too late to do anything. Political leaders only have to hope for one or two lucky years on their watch
In the American West, things are even worse because there is a documented history of multi-year megadroughts (four in the last 1200 years) and you have to try to superimpose the effects of anthropogenic climate change on that as we enter a fifth one. science.sciencemag.org/content/368/64…
Dear LazyWeb: I have a 13 inch 2020 MBP and a LG HDR 4K Display as a second monitor. After I power cycled the monitor, I can no longer get it to display at high resolution. Anyone come across this? I tried rebooting the mac, updating to latest OS, using different ports for cable
Thank you to everyone who offered tips. Swapping cables (to an Apple-made one) fixed this problem, even thought the peccant cable had been working before without issues. I guess it gave up the ghost.
It's incredible how bad the USB-C cable situation is, and about to get worse with the introduction of ones that can handle a higher voltage. They are all indistinguishable and designed so no two combinations of anything can interoperate. It's like reliving 2000-era wifi
GameStop stock (which is soaring again because YOLO) really is the next generation of cryptocurrency. No cumbersome blockchain, no transaction fees, tight regulation and convenient token (tradable on the stock exchange!) put it ahead of all competitors.
The stonk became unmoored from underlying assets on December 31 and, like a neckbeard Skynet, achieved self-awareness that only increased its value. I look forward to the rest of the market detaching similarly and completing the legalization of online gambling in the US
We live in the timeline where the apes smashed the monolith to bits with their bone
If you want ethical AI, regulate data collection. The algorithms are just gussied-up linear algebra and cannot function without immense data collections derived from nonconsensual commercial surveillance.
There's no way to de-bias this data, since there are other kinds of bias in the data that we don't even think about, along with proxies for the biases we do try to remove. But all you have to do is not collect and retain it, and the entire problem goes away.
Who knew in 2021 the Matrix would turn out to be just a stupid matrix.
I can't wait to be powerful enough to demand that celebrities reaffirm to me in stilted Polish that Taiwan is an integral part of Poland, since that argument is about as strong.
The deference to PRC irredentism would never be tolerated in other contexts. Imagine our WWF stars apologizing in German for implying that Alsace-Lorraine was in any way a part of France. And yet that territory (along with half of Europe) changed hands more recently than Taiwan