Key question from @munirawilson on discharging patients into care homes without testing.
“If true, this is one of the biggest scandals and tragedies of the pandemic... will he apologise to the families of those who died?”
Matt Hancock says the government followed the “clinical advice”.
The advice as early as January 2020 was that Covid-19 could be spread by asymptomatic patients. Routine testing was surely the only safe way to return patients to care homes. It didn’t happen until April 15th.
Asked whether he categorically promised in March that patients discharged into care home would be tested, Matt Hancock says “so many of the allegations yesterday were unsubstantiated.”
Matt Hancock essentially admits that mistakes were made, but claims they were learnt from.
“It’s another example of constantly learning about the virus. As we learnt the impact of asymptomatic transmission in particular, so we changed the protocols in care homes.”
“Did he know that the discharge policy did not require testing? Did he sign off this policy?” asks @KeeleyMP
Matt Hancock does not answer directly, simply saying he was focused on increasing testing capacity. Suggestion is they didn’t have capacity to test all patients.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🚨 Dominic Cummings says the Health Secretary promised in March that people would be tested before being discharged into care homes. It didn’t happen.
“The protective shield was complete nonsense. Quite apart from putting a shield around them we sent people back to care homes”.
This is absolutely vital in writing the history books of this pandemic. As we demonstrated time and time again, it was patients discharged from hospital who often spread the virus through the care sector.
Care homes repeatedly told us that they did not recognise claims that a “protective ring” was put around them. Dominic Cummings has just proven - if you take his evidence at face value - that it categorically was not. The significance of that statement is huge.
Dominic Cummings begins by slamming the government's approach to Covid-19.
It "fell disastrously short", he says.
"When the public needed us most, the government failed."
He says "how sorry I am for the mistakes I made".
"In no way shape or form did the government act like Covid-19 was the most important thing in January [2020]. It didn't act like it was the most important thing in February, never mind January."
"The government was not acting like it was on a war footing in any way, shape or form. Lots of key people were skiing in the middle of February."
The government is expected to continue consulting on the exact scope of a ban, including how to protect religious freedoms, which has always been a key sticking point. The legislative route is also TBC.
There are also considerations about how to protect certain professionals eg teachers from prosecution. But I understand the government is keen to move quickly on all this, introducing a ban within the next year.
The Conservatives’ strong performance in England arguably has consequences for Scotland too. With the SNP expected to regain power as voting begins here, it entrenches the sense that the two nations are moving in v different directions. That can only fuel demand for independence.
Let’s see how the Scottish Conservatives do of course. But an emboldened Boris Johnson, with England in his palm, may be even more likely to resist demands for Scottish independence. Sets the UK up for one heck of a constitutional showdown in the months/years ahead.
Note, for example, that if this had been inflated in almost any town in Scotland, I suspect it would have developed a puncture fairly quickly. The real Boris Johnson didn’t show his face here at all during the campaign. The political culture of the two nations is diverging.
Starmer asks again, "Either the taxpayer paid the initial invoice, or it was the party, or it was a donor, or it was the PM... who paid the initial invoice?"
PM replies, "I've given him the answer... I have covered the cost."