#SeditionHunters have wondered for months how the unruly crowd on Jan. 6 could produce synchronized action. Let’s ask an expert: Lt Col. Doug Mastriano (ret.), who taught Strategy at the U.S. Army War College & writes about “hybrid warfare” (link). 1/ fpri.org/article/2016/0…
Mastriano: Russia might use “not .. uniformed separatists.. but largely people in civilian attire, bemoaning fictional abuse... Hiding behind the veil of ambiguity, the unrest would appear local... If NATO [then] dithers”, Russian forces could move in “without firing a shot” 2/
Mastriano has gotten a lot of press recently for being an elected state rep. at the insurrection. But there are lots of those on Jan 6! So far AZ, GA, MO, PA, TX, WV... What sets him apart is this background. Here are some things that might scare you. 3/
In his paper, Mastriano admires the Russian strategy. At U.S. Capitol, action went pretty smoothly too. On Jan 6, Mastriano’s path suggests that he watched the 1:47 PM breach of the NW Scaffold (L), then walked to the NE corner to observe the 1:57 PM breach (R). 4/
Manipulating big crowds requires a lot of crowd control. Who could provide that? At the Capitol on Jan 6 we see some interesting groups: domestic militia, and also the Vets for Trump. Mastriano seems to know them both. (L photo are III%ers.) 5/
Here is Vets for Trump spokesman Rear Adm. Chuck Kubic (ret.) explaining how the group was founded in 2015 to provide crowd control at Trump rallies. “We started by helping to augment his security force...helping direct the crowd”. At CPAC, Feb. 2021 6/
Let’s ask Vets for Trump founder Joshua Macias! Here he is on Jan 6 shouting about Pence: “You backstabbed the veterans!” Might have to be quick because he's facing felony weapons charges for driving to Philly on Election Day in a Hummer full of guns. 7/
Or let’s ask Vets for Trump spokesman Thomas Speciale, intelligence officer (Army Reserves), employee National Counterterrorism Center. Here he is on Jan 6 shouting on Russian TV: “It doesn’t belong to them - it belongs to us!” 8/
Speciale is very instructive! Here he is watching a Thermobaric Improvised Explosive Device at a training camp. He really puts the “terror” in domestic terrorism! (Quiz: when was a thermobaric IED first used in the U.S.? A: Nashville, Dec. 2020) 9/ thedailybeast.com/nashvilles-big…
We could try to ask Speciale’s former boss at the NCTC, Chris Miller, who moved to Acting Sec. of Defense and supervised the (non) deployment of the National Guard on 1/6. But, Miller apparently doesn’t like answering questions much. 10/
You could ask our FORMER Secs. of Defense, though. On Jan 3 all 10 of them issued an unprecedented warning: “Efforts to involve the U.S. armed forces in resolving election disputes would take us into dangerous, unlawful and unconstitutional territory” 11/ washingtonpost.com/opinions/10-fo…
Or ask the Joint Chiefs, who did something similar on Jan 11: "As Service Members...we support and defend the Constitution. Any act to disrupt the Constitutional process is not only against our traditions, values, and oath; it is against the law." 12/ 16af.af.mil/News/Article/2…
Note that nothing in this thread is difficult to obtain. The video is public. The information is public. The strategies are routinely taught. When are we going to ask these questions? Who is going to ask them? 13/
Mastriano himself explains the “brilliance” of hybrid attacks: if they fail one “..simply can wait for another opportunity to apply this strategy of ambiguity when and where the strategic environment is favorable.”
Yes, the NYT is shameful for sourcing an anti-Mamdani article from notorious white supremacist Jordan Lasker. But it's worse. Lasker, who they call an "academic", is a student whose only paper of note is INFAMOUS for unethical data use that got his tenured co-author fired. 1/
Who is the NYT's "academic" source? Lasker is or was a PhD student at Texas Tech, but his only paper of note is earlier, from 2019: "Global Ancestry and Cognitive Ability", whose misuse of data triggered a major investigation and got Cleveland State Prof. Bryan Pesta fired. 2/
The Chronicle of Higher Ed wrote about the scandal. It wasn't just that the article was "racist pseudoscience". It was that the authors misused data from the NIH and lied on their data application - filed by Bryan Pesta. A flagrant ethics violation. 3/ archive.is/KwbGy
Reminder: Elon Musk, whose Starship just blew up on the test stand (with its extra fuel tanks nearby), was allowed for THIRTY YEARS to lie about his training in science. He started lying in 1995, kept lying - and suffered no consequences. But physics itself has consequences. 1/
Just listen to the man's nonsense about how he is shaped by physics and consider: the press allowed him to bullshit like this for 30 YEARS. Of course he got convinced he can just make up his own reality. If anyone died in the Starship explosion tonight, blame the press too. 2/
In 2022 I did a 69-Tweet thread on Elon's fake AstroBoy Genius image, hoping to ward off what was coming: Elon helping to overthrow democracy. What you saw on the launchpad tonight, that's what he's doing now to US science, to our country: exploding it. 3/
Sure, it's funny that Fox News is now using "86" in talking about a fired reporter, when less than a month ago they demanded the FBI investigate "86" as a death threat. But the joke is on us. Performative outrage over bullshit is a test of YOU, to see if you'll accept it. 1/
You can't criticize Fox's words as hypocrisy. Hypocrisy is when someone committed to the truth is inconsistent. Fox and others are post-truth: they're just making noises to see if they can get you to react. They're gaming you. 2/
All of us have a psychological need for rationality. We need to feel that words have meaning, that people mean what they say. We do understand that people lie: a lie is a meaningful but false statement, to deceive. But what Fox is doing here is worse, and harder to cope with. 3/
ABC's explanation of why they suspended correspondent Terry Moran misuses the word "objective". Moran said Stephen Miller was a "world-class hater" and "his hatreds are his spiritual nourishment". Those are objectively true statements. Miller's hatred is deeply documented. 1/
Moran ascribed to Miller an emotion: "hatred". A decade of reporting has documented, objectively, that Miller hates. In 2018, LA Mag interviewed his high school classmates and reported their stories of how Miller hated minorities. "Hate" is their word. 2/ lamag.com/politics/steph…
Terry Moran also said that for Stephen Miller, "hatred is his spiritual nourishment". That's colorful language, but also documented. Here's a high school classmate of Miller's with a story of Miller saying awful, provocative things to immigrants: "he wanted to be hated". 3/
Reminder: Trump has tried this before. It's part of his dream of control, to send in the National Guard against the will of a state or mayor. On May 29, 2020, he Tweeted the threat: "Any difficulty and we will assume control but, when the looting starts, the shooting starts.." 1/
Trump has also overtly sought a Secretary of Defense willing to order the National Guard to shoot at protestors. In 2020 he fired Mark Esper and put in Chris Miller for that reason. Pete Hegseth may face a terrible test now. 2/
On Jan 6, the National Guard arrived late likely because sane heads in the Pentagon delayed them til local police had regained control, out of fear of what Trump might order. There are fewer sane heads now. Hegseth is already failing his test. 3/
Howard Lutnick, our Sec. of Commerce, shows a disconnect from material reality that will make Americans die. A weather forecast cannot be "automated" or MADE AT ALL without data. And Trump is cutting the satellites and weather stations that provide that data. 1/
Lutnick, who is in charge of NOAA and its National Weather Service, seem to think that if you say "web" and "cloud" and "computer" and "AI" then by some magic knowledge appears. But weather forecasts depend on MEASUREMENTS. Which Lutnick is cutting. 2/ kcci.com/article/propos…
The proposed NOAA budget cuts both current satellite operations and planned future satellites meant to make better predictions. Lutnick's testimony suggests: people have forgotten that not everything is a simulation, that reality exists (and bites). 3/ spacenews.com/omb-suggests-n…