#SeditionHunters have wondered for months how the unruly crowd on Jan. 6 could produce synchronized action. Let’s ask an expert: Lt Col. Doug Mastriano (ret.), who taught Strategy at the U.S. Army War College & writes about “hybrid warfare” (link). 1/ fpri.org/article/2016/0…
Mastriano: Russia might use “not .. uniformed separatists.. but largely people in civilian attire, bemoaning fictional abuse... Hiding behind the veil of ambiguity, the unrest would appear local... If NATO [then] dithers”, Russian forces could move in “without firing a shot” 2/
Mastriano has gotten a lot of press recently for being an elected state rep. at the insurrection. But there are lots of those on Jan 6! So far AZ, GA, MO, PA, TX, WV... What sets him apart is this background. Here are some things that might scare you. 3/
In his paper, Mastriano admires the Russian strategy. At U.S. Capitol, action went pretty smoothly too. On Jan 6, Mastriano’s path suggests that he watched the 1:47 PM breach of the NW Scaffold (L), then walked to the NE corner to observe the 1:57 PM breach (R). 4/
Manipulating big crowds requires a lot of crowd control. Who could provide that? At the Capitol on Jan 6 we see some interesting groups: domestic militia, and also the Vets for Trump. Mastriano seems to know them both. (L photo are III%ers.) 5/
Here is Vets for Trump spokesman Rear Adm. Chuck Kubic (ret.) explaining how the group was founded in 2015 to provide crowd control at Trump rallies. “We started by helping to augment his security force...helping direct the crowd”. At CPAC, Feb. 2021 6/
Let’s ask Vets for Trump founder Joshua Macias! Here he is on Jan 6 shouting about Pence: “You backstabbed the veterans!” Might have to be quick because he's facing felony weapons charges for driving to Philly on Election Day in a Hummer full of guns. 7/
Or let’s ask Vets for Trump spokesman Thomas Speciale, intelligence officer (Army Reserves), employee National Counterterrorism Center. Here he is on Jan 6 shouting on Russian TV: “It doesn’t belong to them - it belongs to us!” 8/
Speciale is very instructive! Here he is watching a Thermobaric Improvised Explosive Device at a training camp. He really puts the “terror” in domestic terrorism! (Quiz: when was a thermobaric IED first used in the U.S.? A: Nashville, Dec. 2020) 9/ thedailybeast.com/nashvilles-big…
We could try to ask Speciale’s former boss at the NCTC, Chris Miller, who moved to Acting Sec. of Defense and supervised the (non) deployment of the National Guard on 1/6. But, Miller apparently doesn’t like answering questions much. 10/
You could ask our FORMER Secs. of Defense, though. On Jan 3 all 10 of them issued an unprecedented warning: “Efforts to involve the U.S. armed forces in resolving election disputes would take us into dangerous, unlawful and unconstitutional territory” 11/ washingtonpost.com/opinions/10-fo…
Or ask the Joint Chiefs, who did something similar on Jan 11: "As Service Members...we support and defend the Constitution. Any act to disrupt the Constitutional process is not only against our traditions, values, and oath; it is against the law." 12/ 16af.af.mil/News/Article/2…
Note that nothing in this thread is difficult to obtain. The video is public. The information is public. The strategies are routinely taught. When are we going to ask these questions? Who is going to ask them? 13/
Mastriano himself explains the “brilliance” of hybrid attacks: if they fail one “..simply can wait for another opportunity to apply this strategy of ambiguity when and where the strategic environment is favorable.”
Can we ask why Trump's new hire for the Bureau of Labor Statistics recorded a podcast promoting Project 2025 IN FRONT OF A PICTURE OF A NAZI WARSHIP? @briantylercohen flagged the podcast but missed the Bismarck. Is any reporter going to cover actual Nazis in our government? 1/
Compare the images. Who would do a podcast in front of a ship launched by Hitler, used to attack the US and Allies in WWII? Trump's appointees. People asked today, why did Trump pick the woefully unqualified Antoni for BLS? This is his qualification. 2/ en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_ba…
See that forward gun turret right behind EJ Antoni, our new head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics? Here's Adolf Hitler inspecting the Bismarck in front of that same turret. We are way beyond dog-whistles. Antoni CHOSE to use Hitler's navy up as a backdrop. It was a choice. 3/
Don't sleep on how telling it that Trumps prepares to abandon Ukraine by using Russia-loving Hungarian autocrat Viktor Orban as the excuse: 'Orban told me that Russia is too powerful'. Remember that Orban, Trump, and Netanyahu are the product of the same US political machine. 1/
Orban made his country the poorest in Europe, but he's the role model for America's neo-fascist oligarchs. Peter Thiel & Yoram Hazony's "National Conservatism" is full of Hungarians; Orban's adviser signed their "principles". Even the Economist gets it. 2/ archive.is/GJWuN
Decades of fuckery is the same people, over and over. Arthur Finkelstein's army of dirty tricksters (Roger Stone and Paul Manafort are his 'boys'; Orban, Trump, and Netanyahu the products). Russian influences pushing the far right in the US and Europe. 2/
Sean Casten just learned that Mike Johnson was Dean of a planned law school named after pedophile Southern Baptist leader Judge Paul Pressler, who preyed on young boys. Wait til he learns that Ted Cruz was on its board. Pressler also gave Cruz one of his first endorsements. 1/
Johnson's failed Paul Pressler School of Law was a major play by the religious right. Its board, formed in 2010, was full of the biggest luminaries in the fundamentalist Evangelical universe. Then in 2011, the obscure Ted Cruz was added. Ask him why. 2/ web.archive.org/web/2012012200…
The Paul Pressler School of Law was an intensely political project, meant to train lawyers to overturn US law, build a Christian-focused government. That's why its board were key names - and then Cruz. Many of these people have Jan 6 connections. They're still power players. 3/
As Fox revisits Hilary's email server, let's do a comparative politics test. Question: why did the Jan 6 Committee have to subpoena phone records of Trump officials? Answer: because they were ALL using private emails and phones for government business. Yet no media covered it. 1/
Do you want to learn how Trump aide Vince Haley managed the 1776 Commission, worked on the Jan 6 speech, or negotiated Mike Flynn's pardon? It was on his @ newt. org email from when he worked for Newt Gingrich. Not submitted to the National Archives. 2/ govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GP…
Just look at the J6C's material: only a tiny portion is from the National Archives. Most of it is personal devices and personal emails, used by Trump officials for government business. Wildly insecure and also illegal. But sure, talk about Hillary. 3/ govinfo.gov/collection/jan…
People missed the likely explanation for Trump's bizarre ramble yesterday, when he falsely said his uncle taught the Unabomber Ted Kaczynski. Trump is under huge stress right now about the Jeffrey Epstein files. And it's Epstein who claimed that he studied with the Unabomber. 1/
That detail came out in 2019. After Epstein's address book got released, reporter Leland Nally called the numbers in it, and got a wild interview with Stuart Pivar, who said he was a close friend of Epstein's: "Jeffrey once told me that he studied math with the Unambomber." 2/
Epstein's story is a lie: Kaczynski quit teaching in 1969, when Epstein was in high school. But the interview reminds us again how odd it is that in 1974, after Epstein dropped out of college, he was immediately hired to teach math & physics at Dalton, a prep school. How? 3/
A part of the Epstein nothing-to-see-here fiasco no one's talking about: what happened to the "army of FBI agents" pulled off their cases in March to work on the Epstein files? Pam Bondi made people move to DC, pull all-nighters redacting the files. Did they just.. go home? 1/
Bloomberg: Pam Bondi demanded all the FBI's Epstein files, then ordered "hundreds" of agents to work on them (bizarrely via their personal phones). They were "holed up in offices at the bureau’s sprawling Central Records Complex". Are they still there? 2/ bloomberg.com/news/newslette…
The public should know what happened to Bondi's redaction effort, when and why (and if) the decision was made to send FBI agents home. And if she won't answer maybe one of those hundreds of agents is mad enough to leak. Keep your eye on who is next laid off at the FBI, too. 3/