I know you don't want to hear this, but the position that you "love the Palestinian people but hate Hamas" is actually helping Israel kill the Palestinian people.
The propaganda line that "we love the people but hate whoever happens to be leading them" is the standard Israeli position (ie., Israel had the same position on the PLO back in the day, etc.).
The propaganda line "we love the people but hate their leader" is also the standard regime change position. It goes along with regime change campaigns - the US/Canada/etc. just didn't recognize the Syria election, they didn't recognize the Venezuela elections, etc.
"But these leaders are awful!" you might reply. "The elections were shams!" you might say. I haven't studied Syria's elections closely (or Iran's, etc.) but Venezuela's were not a sham. Nor was the election that Hamas won.
Now there should have been elections since the one that Hamas won so maybe you would argue they don't have legitimacy. But new Palestinian elections have been blocked by the US/Israel, not Hamas. Rejecting the winners while preventing elections - also standard US regime change.
"But Hamas uses violence," you will reply. But the US recognizes plenty of parties that use violence. "Hamas has a hateful charter", you'll say - but Hamas removed the hateful elements of the charter without any change in the non-recognition.
Maybe you're particularly well versed in the lore and say "Hamas is illiberal and doesn't separate religion and state" - but then you'll trip over the fact that neither does Likud, much less Saudi Arabia.
An Israeli writer Uri Avnery used to say that it's only with enemies that one can make peace, not with friends.

When the US delegitimizes a people's leadership, democratic or not, prepares the way for violence against those people.
Israel's siege of Gaza has kept its children on the edge of starvation. Their growth is stunted from malnutrition. Their water is undrinkable. Their agricultural fields have been bombed. Israel never says "we're doing this to kill Palestinian people". They say "Because Hamas."
None of the premises for excluding Hamas hold up. The delegitimation of Hamas is simply a pretext for continuing the siege, which is itself a crime against humanity.

If you are against the siege, you have to be against the exclusion of Hamas.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Justin Podur

Justin Podur Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @justinpodur

23 May
The Anti-Empire Project is sharing tonight a resource on Anti-Palestinian Racism.

The goals are a) to recognize this as a distinct type of racism and b) to make it easy to identify when an argument or claim is based in such racism and not good faith.

podur.org/2021/05/23/ant…
Some of the key points made in the resource -

Anti-Palestinian racism is distinct from Islamophobia and it is distinct from Anti-Arab Racism, despite overlap and the importance of both of those racisms.
All asymmetries of rights when discussing Israel/Palestine are symptoms of anti-Palestinian racism. Examples:

1a. Israeli "security" vs. Palestinian "freedom".
Read 15 tweets
2 Apr
Here are some things you need to know about politics, economics, and the environment.

1. The rich get what they want from politicians, and you don't.

cambridge.org/core/journals/…
2. Rich people take trillions from poor people each year.

rand.org/pubs/working_p…
3. Rich countries take trillions from poor countries each year.

tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.108…
Read 8 tweets
1 Sep 20
An attempt to spell out anti-imperialist moral truism. Or, why Western dissent against Chinese or Russian crimes does not make the world a better place. A thread.
As usual, the starting point is Chomsky. One of his moral truisms is that it is only moral to campaign on issues you can affect.
This moral truism is implicitly about the politics of dissent. A dissenter goes against the common sense of their own society or against the government policy of their own country. Chomsky is all about dissent.
Read 28 tweets
17 Aug 20
So, after reading Losurdo's book on nonviolence, a thread on why Hannah Arendt is no guide for leftists (probably most of you know this, so skip if you already knew).
Arendt is famous for a phrase, "the banality of evil", and for the analysis of "totalitarianism". The phrase is of course clever but by now confuses more than it helps, since there are obviously evils that aren't banal and banalities that aren't evil, so whatever.
Totalitarianism is an analysis that has enabled the enemies of equality and the defenders of hierarchy to conflate any attempt at making society more equal with Nazism, because equality and utopias are communism, and communism is totalitarianism, which is Nazism.
Read 16 tweets
20 Jul 20
No matter how radical your politics are, twitter has made you into a liberal. How?
Definitions: First, radicalism. Political radicalism arises in the 18th century when people around the French and Haiti revolutions take the declaration of rights seriously – which means abolition.
Radicals accepted the right of armed struggle by slaves and the colonized. Radicals are egalitarian. The radical idea is equality of outcomes. Losurdo writes about this very well.

versobooks.com/books/960-libe…
Read 22 tweets
16 Jul 20
Chomsky signed a letter about free speech and something called “cancel culture“, which has prompted a small social media wave of responses.
There is a good piece by Jonathan Cook about how focusing on Chomsky’s signature misses the point. But I am going to focus only on Chomsky here.

jonathan-cook.net/blog/2020-07-0…
My argument: Chomsky’s most powerful message is anti-imperialism. Containing that message has been a preoccupation of the propaganda system since the 1960s.
Read 30 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(