Five path-breaking principles on criminal jurisprudence that emerge from the Goa Sessions Court's Tarun Tejpal judgment barandbench.com/columns/litiga… Truly hideous advice from @barandbench
My suggestions:
- GO TO POLICE ASAP 1/n
@barandbench - Give as accurate a statement as possible. Avoid anything that is not true, particularly if not directly relevant to events. Rapist will NEED those inconsistencies for defense. Don't make it easy.
- Medical test, evidence. There may be no injuries, but forensics may find.
@barandbench - Do not provide multiple versions of your story in different places. If possible, use original police complaint to share story if necessary.
- Avoid trying to manipulate confessions. They won't be accepted and will look bad for you.
- If you are going to court, avoid media!
@barandbench - If you don't want to go to court, don't do a public takedown in a manner that alleges rape. You lose control if someone files complaint and ready or not, will have to prove yourself in court.
- avoid descriptions of trauma that can be disproved.
- never lie in court
@barandbench - avoid appearing uncooperative/refusing the court if given a chance to strengthen your story with evidence.
- if not immediately making police statement, may be useful to tell your first narration as an email so that receiver's story doesn't differ from yours
@barandbench - Do your best to not alter your testimony and be as consistent as possible to avoid having to use the @barandbench wisdom to find ways to be sarcastic about the judge after failing to make case.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
You want to talk about how women discredit women? Let's discuss how feminists are treating a woman judge who gave a judgment that they are trashing like it means nothing and the opposite is true and continue to refer to the accuser as the victim and acquitted accused as rapist.
I mean, this is "feminists" with no authority or competence over a judge trashing her for not acting like they expected her to. Note that this is not about merely disagreeing or filing an appeal and so on, but actually insults leveled at her and completely ignoring any competence
"Feminists" trashing the judge in the #TarunTejpal judgment and ignoring the legal evidence and testimonies cited.
This is literally no different from Ramdev & Co trashing doctors and ignoring scientific evidence.
Again being called a misogynist who wouldn't help a victim of sexual assault.
Is it HELP to call for the arrest of a rape accused in what is guaranteed to be a high profile case, WITHOUT KNOWING what kind of a case the victim (who was a journalist covering VAW did not file) has?
The victim had won in media courts. It was her messiahs riding morah high horses that started clamoring for his arrest.
Now they are after the judge who gave judgment.
What next? High Court? Supreme Court?
My idea of help to the victim would be to drop the case in exchange for not facing defamation charges in the future.
Even if she was really assaulted, the investigation is screwed and contradictions unfavorable to her on record. If she won, would again be challenged anyway.
Been interested in the #TarunTejpal case from the start. Interesting to see that news and social media continues to treat him as the rapist and his accuser as the victim regardless of the judgment.
They also claim that HE is the influential one.
How does that compute?
The coverage of the judgment never fails to mention what the judge said about the accuser's behaviour and also never fails to exclude the context - inconsistencies and contradictions in her statements all through the case, including for trivial things like knowing the rape law.
The coverage also consistently fails to mention that among the first thing Tejpal said after the FIR was filed was to make the CCTV footage public. His defense was that nothing happened in the lift. They got off on the 1st floor, then got back into the lift and went to 2nd.
Praful Khoda Patel making problematic changes in Lakshadweep without consultation with locals, no SOP, absurd limitations on who can contest elections, damaging to fishing (major economic activity), increased pandemic risks. twitter.com/i/spaces/1rmGP…
Other problematic developments under Praful Khoda Patel
Restrictions on beef, meat
Introduction of Amul
Cutting connectivity with Kerala
Refusing right to contest panchayat elections to people with more than 2 children
Do yourself a favor, before insulting a judge because you don't like the judgment, read the judgment. News articles are literally baiting feminists with trigger words. There's over 500 pages explaining reasoning. THEN disagree if you will.
"There are material contradictions and ommissions and inconsistent statements in the deposition of the victim brought on record in cross-examination of PW1 which make her testimony of not sterling quality to base the conviction only on her testimony."
The judgment goes into considerable detail to explain the judgment. For example, this is for those who went "But he confessed" - this was obvious from the word go. I am astonished the victim got such legal advice given the abundance of competence supporting her.
I am truly amazed that news reports on the #TarunTejpal verdict are making no mention whatsoever of detailed mentions of various statements by victim that did not match evidence or were plain absurd and are only quoting provocative conclusions known to trigger feminists.
Many people are citing that victim's testimony should be believed, but does that mean believed in spite of contradictory evidence?
It is almost like media wants to provoke a bawal counting on outragers not reading.
And it is really trivial stuff made absurd by denials. What is the point in denying knowledge of rape laws or importance of evidence, etc after admitting to reporting on VAW AND getting a book grant for same subject? How to trust on unverifiable stuff?