AG Profile picture
29 May, 8 tweets, 2 min read
I'm just going to do this once, then ignore the angry comments.

1- Many on the right have gone out of their way to wrongly downplay 1/6. An angry mob, fueled by 2 months of false conspiracies, tried to take over the Capitol and attacked Capitol Police.
Cont) There was no chance of them being successful, but the goal was clearly to alter the outcome of the electoral process.

2- Some on the left and in the media are now exaggerating the situation to score political points. As an example, it was not comparable to 9/11.
3) The initial reports on Officer Sickick being killed due to a blow to the head were wrong. He died of a stroke and claims he was murdered are incorrect. That does not mean that the events that day did not play a role in his death. Unknowable to what extent.
4) I think a factual analysis of the events that day and what precipitated it would be good, but I don't think it's likely in this environment. People are too focused on the politics of it.
I hope once the partisanship subsides that some lessons will be learned, but feels unlikely right now. Unfortunately, there is a growing problem in politics with people (& not just on one side as some would pretend) believing conspiracies and rewarding demagoguery.
I get the frustration on the right because it feels like those with large platforms (esp in the press) are only interested in holding one side accountable. That doesn't mean you should ignore wrongdoing on your side, but it does make it harder to convince people to do so.
With that said, wrong is wrong. That day was particularly wrong and should not be excused. Neither should what led up to it. That does not prevent you from calling out other wrongs or holding those that have double standards accountable.
That's all I have to say about that.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with AG

AG Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AGHamilton29

29 May
Put this in the context of the filibuster debate: Dems forced through a really questionable oversized 2.2T relief bill because they could pass it without any Republican buy-in. Only now are we having a debate about the potential harms as inflation concerns are growing.
Biden admin ended up negotiating a few small details w Manchin and then just passed it without any actual attempt at compromise. Now imagine that extends to other significant topics. It's supposed to be hard to pass big legislation because it has real impacts. You need concensus.
As for the economic debate: You still get the feeling that a lot of academic economists are either ignoring or downplaying extent of inflation in the market (esp in manufacturing). Spending additional trillions we don't have now would be a big mistake.
Read 4 tweets
29 May
It’s a good thing we aren’t a democracy then. Also, I love all these guys pretending like the 11 Senators just abstained by accident. The system is meant to make it difficult to implement significant changes and requires consensus. That’s a good thing for stability.
The debate over the filibuster isn’t about one particular bill or policy because it’s about how our system works, though those that only care about short-sighted gains keep pretending otherwise because the goal is to bully supporters of the filibuster into just giving in.
The government’s role isn’t to constantly radically change the direction of the country. That’s exactly what you will have if you remove this essential check & a party w a bare majority in Congress and control of the WH can pass anything. Esp w how polarized things are now.
Read 4 tweets
27 May
These people can admit to being wrong or that people they don't like were right so instead they dig deeper and have embarrassing double downs like this.

Tom Cotton asked the right questions. Tom attacked him for it & now is desperately spinning to justify being wrong.
Tom accused Cotton of being a "conspiracy theorist" for merely asking the same questions that now everyone agrees are legitimate.

Then when called out for it back then, he kept falsely accusing Cotton of suggesting it was a bioweapon.
can't*
Read 8 tweets
26 May
This is the Washington Post fact-checker posting an opinion piece full of absolute falsehoods and smears with a map meant to intentionally misinform readers.

Our media really is garbage.
Just to be clear, the person whose piece @GlennKesslerWP just promoted is a former PLO spokesperson.

Here is her defending Hamas while being grilled by Jake Tapper:
Seriously watch that video. It’s 6 minutes of her defending and obfuscating on behalf of a terrorist group. That’s whose voice Kessler and the NYT choose to promote right now.

Garbage.
Read 4 tweets
23 May
This guy is everything wrong with the conversation right now. A guy writes a thread about how American Jews are being attacked in the streets and can’t find solidarity and he responds with ignorant nonsense about the Middle East.

Morally depraved.
That guy is a professor at Georgetown. Look at how many others responding are saying similar things. Again, the clear message to Jewish victims is that the attacks on you don’t matter. And it’s being sent by many with large platforms.
That thread had 0 to do with the fighting in Israel/Gaza. It was about attacks here on Jews. Imagine the outrage if a Professor responded to a thread about an African American family concerned with a rise in racist attacks with whataboutism.

But here we get silence.
Read 5 tweets
22 May
I appreciate the sentiment, but it's something many of us saw coming. If you normalize bigotry, the violence becomes inevitable.
Step 1: Falsely accuse the world's only Jewish state of trying to kill innocent people.

Step 2: Suggest America is complicit in Step 1 as a result of Jews controlling gov't/media.

Step 3: Act shocked that violence breaks out targeting American Jews.
The justifications/smears in steps 1 and 2 change over time, but we always end up in step 3. Some accused Jews of drinking children's blood, killing Christ, betraying Germany, oppressing the poor etc.

The result is always the same. As is the silence from so many.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(