This conversation between journalists @Isikoff & @BarryMeier -- about the latter's new book on how private spies exploited gullible media (including Isikoff) -- to spread the Steele Dossier Fraud (and other scams) -- is fascinating (start at 22:00):
Meier is a long-time NYT journalist, someone most definitely not with the MAGA agenda. Yet as Isikoff points out, his book is covered only by right-wing media -- Tucker, WashExaminer, etc. He explains it's because CNN/MSNBC, others won't confront their failures or hear dissent.
Watch this clip, where Isikoff asks Meier about how only right-wing media will acknowledge his book, and how he feels about that.
Meier says that as a journalist, his only interest is having people hear his truthful reporting, and it's not his fault CNN excludes dissent.
Think about the scam which corporate media outlets have perpetrated:
If you dissent from their orthodoxies and narratives, they blackball you, pretend your dissent doesn't exist: only head-nodding panels.
Then, if you speak to outlets that allow dissent, it's deemed immoral.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
European leaders -- including Germany's Merkel and France's Macron -- are furious over new reports this week that the Obama/Biden Admin used Danish intelligence in 2014 to spy on their own EU allies, including Merkel herself. Demanding answers from Biden:
Recall that at the height of the Snowden reporting, Merkel was so furious with Obama that she accused him of using "Stasi" tactics to spy on her and entire European populations -- a rather stinging accusation given her childhood in East Germany:
In my 2014 book based on NSA reporting, I described a program whereby NSA cooperated with Danish intelligence to spy on US allies. Snowden himself warned of how Denmark could be used by the US to spy on German leaders and German citizens:
This judicial ruling about the raging debates over group-based benefits vividly highlights the social, political and culture divisions driving U.S. politics.
The judge who authored the opinion, Amul Thapar, is the first-ever South Asian federal judge. His reasoning:
The majority ruling also emphasized the bizarre, now-common aspect that racial and ethnic groups who earn the most in the US are given preferences, while groups earning less (including whites and Middle Easterners) are "sent to the back of the line" for COVID relief).
Dave Weigel says it was non-reporters who made the 'ooooh' sound about Biden's chocolate chip ice cream after a reporter asked him what flavor he got. I'll take his word for it, though the WH press corps does often swoon at Biden's cuteness:
Please take the time to watch this video in which Russell Brand (@rustyrockets), long associated with the left, explains why the united pre-election censorship by the corporate press and Silicon Valley of the Biden Family laptop archive was so dangerous:
Brand uses clips of the interview I did with him, but this is his 15-minute monologue -- very insightful and plain-spoken -- about why this was such a menacing event.
US media & tech giants united to bar millions of Americans from hearing this reporting before they voted.
Relatedly: this @DouthatNYT column is very smart and important. As the liberal-left gains cultural hegemony and political power, they no longer need or want anti-authoritarian theorists like Foucault. Factions that become dominant turn authoritarian:
Yet another huge vindication of Edward Snowden's whistleblowing and the reporting it enabled:
The European Court of Human Rights rules the mass surveillance program of GCHQ (the UK version of NSA) illegal: violating both privacy rights and press freedom.
While the west is currently wallowing in an orgy of self-righteousness over Belarus' thuggish arrest of a dissident journalist, realize that the two people who arguably did the most to expose the truth about the US Govt -- @Snowden & Assange -- are exiled & imprisoned.
Assange and Snowden are the west's Roman Protasevich, and are treated exactly the same as Lukashenko treats him, up to and including the lawless forced landing of a Bolivian plane in order to nab Snowden. The US/UK have no moral credibility to preach.
What Belarus did, while illegal, is not unprecedented. The dangerous tactic was pioneered by the same U.S. and E.U. officials now righteously condemning it.
At the time, EU states falsely denied that they forced the downing of Bolivia's plane, but ultimately admitted the truth.
The whole world suspected who was behind this dangerous and illegal downing of the Bolivian President's jet: the US.
In 2013, it was left to the US State Dept spokesperson -- Jen Psaki -- to answer questions. As always, she refused even basic transparency about the US role.