As I mentioned in a thread this morning, the new edition of Warrior Cop is out today. I'm really grateful to have the opportunity to update this story.

However, I do need to acknowledge an error. After turning in my manuscript last December, I asked my editor if I could add ...
... an additional section about the 1/6 violence at the Capitol. She agreed it's an important part of the story, so I turned that section in a couple weeks after the riots.

My error concerns the death of Officer Brian Sicknick. At the time, the Capitol Police, DOJ ...
... and national reporting all indicated his death was directly caused by one or more people involved in the riot. But in April, the medical examiner's report concluded that though the riots may have contributed, Sicknick died of natural causes.

When that report came out ...
... I immediately emailed my editor to request a change. But it was too late for the print edition. It should be fixed in the ebook, and it will be corrected in the next printing.

The error isn't relevant to my broader point, which is that 1/6 was precisely the sort of ...
... event for which law-and-order groups had long argued police militarization was necessary. And yet despite ample warning, the police were completely unprepared and overwhelmed, almost certainly because of the demographics and politics of the rioters.

That said ...
... I wrote that the rioters "literally killed a police officer," which we now know is flat wrong. (And yes, my use of the word "literally" was particularly unfortunate.)

It's a bummer to know you have a clear error in a big, forthcoming project, and there's really nothing ...
... you can do but acknowledge it, apologize, and fix it for future printings.

But I do want to apologize here for my mistake.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Radley Balko

Radley Balko Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @radleybalko

17 May
Some context for today's retroactivity ruling:

Before it agreed to hear Ramos (in which it ruled that laws allowing convictions from non-unanimous juries are unconstitutional), dozens and likely hundreds of prisoners had previously petitioned the court . . .
. . . on the very same question. The court declined to hear their cases, as it does with the vast majority of petitions. So those convictions all stood.

The court's subsequent ruling in Ramos meant all those convictions were unconstitutional. But today, the court ruled that ...
. . . even though those prisoners' unheard arguments were correct -- their rights were indeed violated -- they're all screwed.

Not because of anything they did. Only because they're unlucky enough to have filed before the court decided it was interested in the issue.
Read 10 tweets
25 Apr
A quick thought on these bills: Since Ferguson, I’ve heard many, many older white people voice their fear of inadvertently driving near a protest, getting stuck in front of a wall of protesters, then getting pulled out of their car and beaten.

newrepublic.com/article/162163…
Can’t tell you how many times I’ve heard it. It’s usually followed by an admission that if this happens, they’d have no choice but to run people over to save themselves or their families. It’s an oddly specific fear. And one some people apparently think about a lot.
I’ve heard it enough, especially from older white men — including some who might otherwise agree with much of the protesters’ message — that I’ve come to assume it’s common. Given the age of the people from whom I’ve heard it, my hunch is the Reginald Denny video...
Read 5 tweets
9 Apr
Just stumbled on this humdinger of a qualified immunity case from 2019.

A Georgia man was exonerated by DNA after serving 7 years on a rape conviction. Because the Georgia had no compensation law for wrongful convictions, the state legislature . . .

media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/f…
. . . had to pass a special bill to compensate him. The DA who prosecuted him (the same DA who prosecuted Troy Davis, BTW) wrote a letter to the legislature claiming the man was still under indictment for rape and kidnapping. This was false to the point of libel. But it worked.
Because of the letter, the legislature killed the bill before it came to a vote. So the man sued the DA. In 2019 the 11th Circuit ruled: The DA lied, but he's still entitled to QI.

Why? Because there's no "clearly established law" stating that it's unconstitutional ...
Read 4 tweets
1 Apr
If, like me, you're dizzied by the back and forth over the Georgia voting law, this is helpful. Seems like the GOP wanted to make the law a lot worse, but backed down after backlash. The law does expand voting access in some ways, ...

businessinsider.com/georgia-new-el…
... but more in rural (read: white, conservative) areas. The water thing is real, and bad. There are some good parts, like mandating new precincts in areas where there have been long waits. Some provisions seem destined to make vote counting more chaotic. But the worst part is...
. . . kneecapping the secretary of state by giving the legislature control over the election board. Hard not to read that as direct repudiation of Raffensperger for doing his job, and not facilitating Trump's attempt to nullify the presidential election.
Read 4 tweets
4 Mar
I don’t know if “defund” cost the Democrats votes among some demographics. Polling suggests so. But polling also suggests they picked up votes among others. Here’s what the Floyd protests definitely did do: They moved the needle on qualified immunity, no-knocks, and police abuse.
They inspired state-level reforms that weren’t fathomable a year ago. Maybe “defund” created room for those positions. Made them seem moderate. However it happened, it happened.

Much of the reaction to that Shor interview has been about points-scoring in the wokeness wars.
It’s been centrists and libertarians who otherwise claim to care about police reform scolding those silly protesters for making unreasonable demands. Here’s the thing: The protests achieved more in eight months than centrists and we libertarians have in decades.

Maybe it’s ...
Read 6 tweets
21 Feb
Based on the comments at the WP to my piece yesterday, I think an explanatory thread is in order.

The study I wrote about was designed to see if medical examiners' manner of death determination can be influenced by cognitive bias.
washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
This is important because we tend to think of an ME's opinion as grounded in science than, much more so than, say, a tire tread or fiber expert. But determining "manner" of death is typically much more subjective "cause" of death. This, despite ...
... the fact that a manner of death determination is profoundly more consequential. If an ME determines a death was an accident, we have a tragedy. If an ME determines a death was a homicide, there's a very good chance someone is going to prison for a long time. As I point ...
Read 21 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(