Tourkokratia (Turkocracy) in Anatolia & the Balkans has clear parallels to the contemporaneous Sultanate and Gurkaniya ("Mughal") tyranny in the Indian subcontinent.
Reborn as the founding ideology of a certain "Land of the Pure", which is why neo-Ottomanism is so popular there.
Greece, Bulgaria, Serbia all experienced centuries of Turkocracy.
Their independence and identity are based on rejecting foreign tyranny and slavery, through cultural revival.
While "independent" India glorifies that period, to prevent any such revival.
Behold the importance of having a self-respecting state that reflects the values and sacrifices of its people.
Vietnam was also under foreign rule for centuries, but their history is told from the perspective of native resistance, not foreign invaders.
"You must never have read a history book. If you'd had, you'd know we weren't pawns of the Chinese or the Russians. McNamara, didn't you know that? Don't you understand that we have been fighting the Chinese for 1000 years?"
"We were fighting for our independence. And we would fight to the last man. And we were determined to do so. And no amount of bombing, no amount of U.S. pressure would ever have stopped us."
- Nguyễn Cơ Thạch, former Foreign Minister of Vietnam, 1995
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"The Queen’s courtiers banned “coloured immigrants or foreigners” from serving in clerical roles in the royal household until at least the late 1960s, according to newly discovered documents."
"The documents also shed light on how Buckingham Palace negotiated controversial clauses – that remain in place to this day – exempting the Queen and her household from laws that prevent race and sex discrimination."
"[I]n 1968, the Queen’s chief financial manager informed civil servants that “it was not, in fact, the practice to appoint coloured immigrants or foreigners” to clerical roles in the royal household, although they were permitted to work as domestic servants."
"Asaf Ali had described his old India House comrade Savarkar as someone who lived in the spirit of Mazzini and Shivaji, which was apt considering the fact that the Italian revolutionary and the great Maratha king were his political heroes."
"After Savarkar died, Hiren Mukherjee of the Communist Party of India stood up in the Lok Sabha to demand that parliament pay homage to [him].
Dange described him as a great anti-imperialist revolutionary while Indira Gandhi said Savarkar was a byword in daring and patriotism."
"His final release was widely welcomed. There was a lot of interest about his next move.
Two young socialist leaders, SM Joshi and Achyut Patwardhan, who would later become heroes of the 1942 movement, went to Ratnagiri to persuade Savarkar to join the Congress Socialist Party."
"They are not here to help you figure out what you believe. You are a hopelessly irrational consumer. They are here, rather, to tell you what to think.
There is no attempt to distinguish between the journalistic and the editorial. It all blurs together as “analysis”."
"This means...Vox inherently practices a crude and cruel form of rhetorical dishonesty: it treats matters of profound complexity as if they are able to be settled through mere expertise. If anyone disagrees with what [Vox] have concluded, they must be dumb, delusional, or both."
"Declassified records from the Reagan presidential library show how the US government enlisted civilian agencies in psychological operations designed to exploit information as a way to manipulate the behavior of targeted foreign audiences..."
"Agencies that were traditionally assigned to global development (USAID) or international information (USIA) were incorporated into U.S. strategies for peacetime psyops, a military technique for breaking the will of a wartime enemy by spreading lies, confusion and terror."
"Psyops play on the cultural weaknesses of a target population so they could be more easily controlled or defeated, but the Reagan administration was taking the concept outside the traditional bounds of warfare and applying psyops to any time the U.S. could claim some threat ..."
As @dinesh2sinha spotted, a great reference to 'Yes, Minister',
"In practical terms we have the usual six options:
1. Do nothing. 2. Issue a statement deploring the action. 3. Lodge an official protest. 4. Cut off aid. 5. Break off diplomatic relations. 6. Declare war."
"1. If we do nothing, we implicitly agree. 2. If we issue a statement we'll just look foolish.
3: If we lodge a protest it will be ignored. 4: We can't cut off aid because we don't give them any. 5. If we break off diplomatic relations, we can't negotiate."
"The essence of neo-colonialism is that the State which is subject to it is, in theory, independent and has all the outward trappings of international sovereignty.
In reality, its economic system and thus its political policy is directed from outside."
- Kwame Nkrumah
"Neo-colonialism is also the worst form of imperialism.
For those who practise it, it means power without responsibility and for those who suffer from it, it means exploitation without redress.
[It] is an attempt to export the social conflicts of the capitalist countries."