The fantasy of "flattening the curve" completely ignores the reality of seasonality. There is no flattening because only the height, but not the width of the curve is affected by slowing the spread. Seasonality determines the width. 1/x
The two COVID waves (Winter of 19/20 and 20/21) are clearly visible in this chart of weekly deaths. Seasonality is obvious. And there is ZERO evidence of flattening the curve. Waves did not get "fatter" than previous years. 2/x
Here's what really happens... each peak is blunted by delaying the number of infections required to reach herd immunity. Those infections are delayed until the next winter season, or the next. 3/x
Sounds lovely until you realize that lockdowns are preventing the healthy from acquiring herd immunity, so the ring of immunity that would normally form around the vulnerable never happens.
4/x
Instead of providing focused protection for the vulnerable for 6 to 8 weeks while that ring of immunity forms, the vulnerable have now faced a mortal risk of death from everyone they encounter for 15 months and counting!
5/x
And they're still not safe because the virus is STILL circulating in the community.
6/x
Much of the second wave of deaths was probably preventable if lockdowns hadn't interferred with natural immunity. That's why lockdowns kill. 7/x
Allowing the virus to spread in the community during the 1st wave, without lockdowns, while providing focused protection for the vulnerable would NOT have produced more deaths. We know exactly who is at risk of severe outcomes: 8/x
Those at risk are the very old with severe pre-existing health conditions, particularly those trapped in long-term care and hospitals. 6 to 8 weeks of barring the door and they could have rejoined society. Hardly anyone else was at risk of dying. 9/x
Thanks to lockdowns, the vulnerable keep on dying because the healthy community around them is still unsafe.
Find out more about this and many backwards pandemic policies with lethal consequences in my recent investigative interview:
10/end juliusruechel.com/2021/05/the-li…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
One of the dirtiest tricks ever pulled by our Canadian govt happened just after Confederation out on the newly opened prairie and led to thousands of farmers fleeing Canada to rebuild their destroyed lives in the USA.
A thread 🧵
2/ As you undoubtedly already know, one of the conditions for BC to join Confederation was for a railway to link East and West, coast to coast.
The first attempt to build the railway collapsed after it became known that Sir John A. MacDonald had awarded the railway contract to his buddies in exchange for them funding his election expenses in 1872. This was known as the Pacific Railroad Scandal.
MacDonald was forced to resign, though he returned to power 5 years later and ruled for another 18 years. (He also had a habit of proroguing parliament to try to save his political skin).
But the next chapter of this story is where the scandal really heats up...
3/ After the Pacific Scandal, the govt started from scratch. A new company was founded, called the Canadian Pacific Railroad (CPR) company.
The project was funded by private investors (who owned the company), but was showered with taxpayer-funded subsidies and the company raised money by issuing bonds... that were fully backed by the govt.
In other words, the corporate-govt partnership that is the staple of how so much business is done in Canada goes all the way to Canada's earliest beginnings where private companies owned by politician's friends reap the benefits while taxpayers are on the hook for a part of the bill and to fund bailouts if anything goes wrong.
Furthermore, the CPR was given vast land grants that they could sell to farmers out on the prairie to help the railroad raise money (and achieve the govt's objective of settling the prairie).
The railroad immediately got to work... on scamming Canadians with a dirty real estate scam...
In politics, nothing is what it seems. This isn't because of a dispute with Trudeau over tariffs & spending.
She resigned because she's making a play for his job, while simultaneously outflanking Mark Carney.
Let me explain the elaborate game that I think is afoot... (a thread🧵)
1/
The whole world can see Trudeau's star is fading. Even the 🇨🇦 dollar is in freefall. His own party wants him gone. Freeland, as his Deputy PM + Finance Minister, is tied at the hip to Trudeau's sinking ship.
Rumors were Trudeau was about to fire Freeland as his "fall guy".
And Mark Carney was being floated as her replacement, or possibly even his.
2/
But here's where things get devious as she uses her resignation as a way to untie herself from Trudeau's sinking ship while simultaneously using it as a way to outflank Mark Carney in the bid for the Liberal leadership.
3/
A brief overview of 🇨🇦Premiers (and a few mayors) with listings on the World Economic Forum's website or who have ties to WEF, or attended meetings in Davos.🤔
Having a listing doesn't necessarily mean they endorse the WEF nor do we know what their relationship is. But...
1/
Ontario: Premier Doug Ford
(via the Internet Archive)
🧵
Surge in Omicron cases was to be expected given🇨🇦’s low natural immunity. Compare cases in🇨🇦(low nat. immunity) to South Africa (high nat. immunity). Yet low # of hospitalizations as % of cases illustrates how mild Omicron is even with low natural immunity 1/x
Incidentally, cases appear to have plateaued. Since prior variants had steep waves and Omicron also had short sharp waves in other countries, like South Africa, we may already be peaking.
2/x
At the rate Omicron is spreading, it’s looking hopeful that a majority of people will finally develop natural antibodies. Whether it's enough to reach everyone depends on whether lockdowns drag this out much longer -
3/x
A thread on the predator instinct, honey badgers, ... and bullies:
Once a predator spots you, the safest way to deal with it is often to master your fear by simply turning to face it and holding your ground.
1/x
To think of it from the predator's perspective, the most useful characteristic in helping identify whether something is "prey" or "not prey" is whether the thing shows fear or whether it simply ignores the predator, goes abt its business, & growls if anything gets too close
2/x
Tiptoeing, flinching, timidity, cautiousness, or running away all signal you're probably edible without a fight.
These behaviours trigger the predatory instinct to go for the kill.